Trend Vision One Reviews

My use cases for Trend Vision One are typically reactive, letting it scan and monitor our environment, and we typically respond quickly to any workbenches that come up. 

We also try to adapt to the Cyber Risk Index or the security score, keeping that at the lowest amount possible on a weekly or bi-weekly basis as we push out updates and do maintenance.

My favorite features in Trend Vision One include the Cyber Risk Index, which breaks down various pieces of info into one easily digestible score. I appreciate the workbenches. They provide a visual of how they operate for the most part, and I value the in-depth details they offer since we can mostly operate off of that, giving us enough info to crunch and figure out what's happening.

While it's not an actual feature of the application, I appreciate the clinics and seminars that Trend provides, as I went to one last year that got me from zero to beginner, and I hope to advance to intermediate with another seminar series this year.

Trend Vision One helps reduce my mean time to detect and respond to threats as without it, we would be scrambling and confused with not much information to go off of for threat hunting. I'm not sure what we were using previously. As long as I've been here, it's been Trend Vision One, and we're very happy with it. We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider since we think it's a very good product, and we appreciate the speed and breadth of data we receive from it.

I sometimes see noise from false positives with Trend Vision One. One clear instance involved the AI deep fake feature, which would throw up false positives whenever someone had a Teams meeting with a blurred background, leading us to turn it off as it activated for every meeting. Additionally, there were minor false positives throughout the year related to Microsoft update files and certain DLLs, however, they don't clutter Trend Vision One much and have essentially gone away in recent months.

I am very happy with Trend Vision One's platform ability to provide centralized visibility and management across protection layers. The platform extends into various categories, offering oversight over email and even flagging suspicious activities that occur on a server, despite not having a Trend Vision One agent on it. For instance, an admin setting up remote access on that server was flagged as suspicious, and I appreciate the reach that Trend Vision One has across different scattered categories it monitors.

In terms of improving Trend Vision One, it might sound silly, yet it seems notoriously uncooperative with middle clicks and opening sections in new tabs. I'm a big tab browser, and it feels hitting a brick wall when I have to refresh in a new tab or make a copy of a tab to move forward. If we can enable middle clicks to open sections in new tabs, it would greatly benefit me personally.

I've been using Trend Vision One for a few months, approximately eight to ten months at this point.

Regarding stability, I don't think Trend Vision One has ever caused any lagging, crashing, or downtime. There was one situation where we may have misconfigured something, forgetting a checkbox, and Trend Vision One's scheduled scans might have used some CPU resources, however, that's on our end. Besides that, Trend Vision One works exactly as intended and has never hindered our operations, feeling more a collaborator than a roadblock.

I don't think I've encountered any issues with scalability; we're growing steadily, and I believe Trend Vision One can keep up with our demand. Our company has about 200 employees in Canada, and I can foresee that if we doubled in size, Trend Vision One would accommodate that very easily.

I have contacted the technical support before. We're very happy with the technical support from Trend Vision One, feeling we have our own dedicated technician who knows the entire suite of applications. They are very intelligent and responsive, and as we submit feature requests, they seem to make it into the actual list of features in Trend Vision One, so we maintain a good relationship with their technical support and development teams.

Positive

I'm not sure what we were using previously. As long as I've been here, it's been Trend Vision One, and we're very happy with it. We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider as we consider it a very good product.

The experience of first using Trend Vision One is really difficult due to the steep learning curve. Thankfully, I attended a Trend Vision One seminar that got me from zero to beginner, as without that, it involves a lot of guesswork with little grounding to go off of. I really recommend their seminars and tutorials.

I do not know much about the pricing of Trend Vision One. My understanding is it's expensive. We pay for it anyway, and there's always sticker shock. Still, we feel it's necessary as this product covers all our needs.

We're hesitant to shop around for any other provider. Trend Vision One is a very good product, and we appreciate the speed and breadth of data we receive from it.

I'm not sure if I use the cyber risk exposure management capabilities. Trend Vision One requires very little maintenance on my end, mostly just keeping up with refreshing the license, which is about all I hear related to Trend Vision One maintenance.

Some top security challenges in my industry include securing anything exposed to the internet, especially since we were previously hit with ransomware. The ability of Trend Vision One to detect and cut off threats early, clean up files before they execute, and address phishing emails helps us significantly. We also have their email and collaborative security, which is crucial along with having zero-day protections to receive early warnings of threats, allowing us to act immediately outside our maintenance windows.

I'm not completely sure where we use the Trend Vision One sensors, as I didn't set them up. However, we do have a DDI that we paid a lot for, which is one of our biggest data sources and populates much of the information in Trend Vision One. We also have a network sensor at our different location in the United States, which is a temporary holdover until we can upgrade to something more robust.

It's not critical for my company that Trend Vision One has AI built into its platform in terms of needing a language model to explain things, however, AI is actually critical for threat detection and behavioral analysis. That aspect of behavior monitoring and action based on behavior is very important.

Trend Vision One has helped my organization reduce its cyber risk. For instance, even prior to acquiring the DDI, the DDI's presence on our network found a threat actively in progress, and we were able to act on it, demonstrating its effectiveness from day zero.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Trend Vision One a nine overall.

We operate as an MSP. Most of my clients are financial institutions, such as one of the largest banks in Pakistan. We primarily serve enterprise-level financial institutions and banks. 

The best features in Trend Vision One are the workbench and the XDR feature for the playbooks. We continue to use these two features extensively. 

We also have our own product called SIRP, which is a SOAR platform, and we integrate it with Trend Vision One for automations, alert information, auto enrichment, and IOC enrichment. 

We appreciate that Trend Vision One provides a good API with actions for our SIRP operations. 

While we did not calculate specific MTTR and MTTD metrics, it has significantly reduced suspicious alerts and benign alerts compared to what we previously experienced.

Trend Vision One provides its own MDR services for detection capabilities, similar to CrowdStrike. Their team collaborates effectively with us on response and detection. The solution doesn't require frequent maintenance, and services are not regularly interrupted.

Areas that need improvement in Trend Vision One include the AI-based mechanism, AI-based detections, and AI-based autonomous detections, which are currently lacking. Additionally, they need to add more integrations to their playbooks. They should lower the cost for integrations as they charge for each individual integration. Trend Vision One does not initially disclose to customers that they need to purchase additional licenses and pay more for integrations. They need to modify their licensing mechanism and improve their AI-based detections.

We have been using Trend Vision One for approximately six to seven years. We provide services to different customers on various security controls and security products.

Trend Vision One demonstrates strong stability, warranting a rating of seven out of ten.

Trend Vision One is scalable. For DMG area operations, they have their own dedicated product available.

I cannot provide detailed feedback about Trend Vision One support as we haven't needed to utilize it extensively. The configuration process is straightforward enough that we rarely require support assistance.

Positive

Most of the enterprise-level clients use CrowdStrike or Cylance. Trend Vision One or Trend Vision One Apex Central is used by most smaller banks, while bigger banks predominantly use CrowdStrike and Cylance.

In Pakistan and the MENA region, clients prefer on-premises deployment unless cloud services are available. When cloud hosting is located in the US or other countries, Saudi and UAE clients typically opt for on-premises deployment.

Vision One is very easy to deploy. We don't have to do much of anything on that. We just have to deploy the agent, and we have to configure the policy. It's not very complicated.

Regarding pricing, Trend Vision One offers very competitive rates compared to CrowdStrike and Cylance. Customers who cannot afford CrowdStrike's pricing can easily opt for Trend Vision One.

We are not a partner with Trend Micro; we only provide deployment services. Trend Vision One can generate false positives; however, this depends on the whitelisting configuration, particularly in the application control area and IOC whitelisting. The detection mechanism is good, though CrowdStrike performs better in detections and reducing false positives due to its behavioral-based analysis and AI-based features. In comparison with other vendors, CrowdStrike ranks first, followed by Cylance, then Trend Vision One. Cylance and Trend Vision One can work together effectively.

I would primarily recommend CrowdStrike, and then Trend Vision One for customers with budget constraints. CrowdStrike's recent launch of a new AI model and features such as the MDC module for comprehensive log collection provide superior visibility and control compared to Trend Vision One.

The overall rating for Trend Vision One is seven out of ten.

Our use case for Trend Vision One is for our security platform. We use it for antivirus, XDR, and network telemetry purposes.

Trend Vision One helped us to consolidate our use of security vendors and reduce silos. We had three or four consoles from different products, and we consolidated them into one console with this product. 

Trend Vision One helped reduce the time to detect and respond to threats by 70% to 80%.

Trend Vision One has helped us reduce noise from false positives.

We have been using cyber risk exposure management for 2 months since upgrading in April. It helps us identify blind spots by providing more visibility and insights into our environment, making it a valuable feature. 

We use the network sensor, and its coverage is critical. With SIEM, we gain substantial insights into our environment, and having a complete 360 view is necessary in today's security world. It reduces the risk by 50%.

Having AI built into the Trend Vision One platform is important for our organization. It reduces many manual steps, resulting in more and quicker detections and advanced automation for remediation, improving efficiency by 60% to 70%. The solution aims to reduce risks and enhance detection.

I like how easy it is, and there is a single pane of glass. We have one console for everything. 

Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers. It has the functionality of different products and management of a single pane of glass. We have one console for everything. As a security engineer, it's easier to check the alerts and find everything. It consolidates a lot of consoles into one, and that's what we like most about it.

Vulnerability scanning could be improved. They need to see more CVEs and scan products for known vulnerabilities, allowing for better display and review of potentially exploitable servers by hackers or through configuration settings.

We have been using Trend Vision One for approximately 18 months.

We haven't experienced any stability issues. It has proven to be stable.

The scalability of Trend Vision One is good.

I have contacted technical support from Trend Micro. The quality and speed of support are good.

Positive

It was easy. It took us one day to fully deploy Trend Vision One.

Some maintenance is required for updating agents on the servers.

The deployment involved just one person working with the vendor in one day.

Trend Vision One has reduced risks by 50%. We have reduced the response time by approximately 70%-80%.

When we have a good product such as Trend Vision One, the price is fine.

We have used Trend Micro products for many years, and we upgraded to Trend Vision One. We didn't test any alternatives, staying with what we've used for years.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

My main use case for Trend Vision One is XDR security in our AWS environment for our EC2 instances, and I'm hoping to accomplish effective security measures with it.

The best features Trend Vision One offers are the dashboard, reporting, and the customer service experience, specifically the customer service experience.

What makes the customer service experience stand out is that the onboarding process was exceptionally smooth. John, our account manager, was able to coordinate us with a technical resource to help with a white-glove onboarding process to ensure that our migration from Trend Micro Cloud One to Vision One was smooth and successful.

Trend Vision One has impacted my organization positively, and it's our XDR solution, so it works as intended.

Having Trend Vision One as my XDR solution has helped my team significantly. The Sentinel integration is a huge help for allowing us to detect and respond to events in our AWS environment.

I cannot think of anything that Trend Vision One can be improved.

I have been using Trend Vision One for about a week.

Trend Vision One is stable. I have experienced minimal issues with reliability or downtime.

Trend Vision One's scalability is excellent. It can handle my organization's growth and changing needs.

The customer support is exceptional. Working with their technical resource, Victor, was fantastic, and I am very happy with the customer service that we experienced from both Victor and John.

I would rate the customer support exceptionally high on a scale of one to ten.

I did not previously use a different solution before Trend Vision One.

I have seen a return on investment. I have been a Trend Micro customer for years and I continue to see value in their platform and have used it at several jobs.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very easy. Our enterprise account manager, John, made all of that very easy, as he was able to send me the private offer, walk us through accepting it inside of the AWS Marketplace, and helped us cancel our existing subscription.

Before choosing Trend Vision One, I evaluated other options. I considered Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender.

The advice I would give to others looking into using Trend Vision One is to try it.

I rate Trend Vision One an 8 out of 10.

We use Trend Vision One for our endpoint protection in our data center, mostly focused around our server assets, and we do anti-malware, intrusion prevention, as well as firewall, host-based firewall capabilities.

The ease of configuration, customization, and organization are what I appreciate the most about Trend Vision One. 

It is a bit slow to implement kernel support on the Linux side. When doing patching and upgrades on our Linux servers, we often find that the Trend agent doesn't support the kernel version. It's usually not far behind, but we often are in a position where we may not be properly protected for a period.

We started using Trend Deep Security, which was the product prior to Trend Vision One, seven or eight years ago, and then we transitioned to Trend Vision One two years ago. While we have been using Trend Vision One proper for two years, we had essentially the same product in an on-prem version for seven or eight years.

We've had performance issues with the agents of Trend Vision One at odd times, but I wouldn't say it's been a widespread issue or a common issue. Once in a while, there have been things that we've attributed to Trend.

The scalability of Trend Vision One seems infinite. We're not a huge organization, so we haven't really run into any limitations, but it appears it can scale to accommodate and serve any of our purposes.

The quality of support for Trend Vision One is generally very good. If we have any issues with support, we can leverage our sales engineer for support or escalation. I really haven't had any concerns. I have contacted the technical support or customer support via phone number or ticket.

Positive

We have used Microsoft Defender, Sophos, as well as McAfee as alternatives to Trend Vision One. I prefer Trend Vision One more compared to those alternatives.

We transitioned from our on-premises Deep Security deployment to Vision One, and the process was relatively smooth. However, we encountered a few challenges related to legacy configurations and ensuring proper connectivity to our server assets. With an on-premises software application, we didn’t have to worry about internet accessibility for some of our server nodes. Consequently, we faced issues getting non-internet-connected server endpoints to communicate with the cloud. Luckily, there is a solution for that, but it took some time to get everything functioning properly.

Trend Vision One is a large product suite. There are many features that we don't have fully deployed, but the amount of time it took for us to go from on-prem to the cloud for similar services without onboarding anything new that Trend Vision One offered was two months for 400 assets, server nodes.

It has reduced our time to detect and respond to threats, but I don’t have a way to quantify that.

I know the pricing for Trend Vision One. It's been a while, but it doesn't seem bad. They made some changes to their pricing in the past. It used to be a per-server node pricing structure, but now they do it by credits. I would say it's improved because we can, for the same investment, shift and adjust which capabilities we're leveraging within the platform. It's not super expensive. It's definitely an increased cost over leveraging Microsoft Defender, which we already have the licensing and capability for. We chose to spend money on this as opposed to leveraging a product that we already had, but the cost is fair.

The sensors we're using include the anti-malware products, and we have the EDR sensors deployed on our server endpoints. They have network sensors and other features, but we're not leveraging any of those.

We started onboarding some of our services in the last three or four months to Trend Vision One to gain more visibility, so it's early in that adoption. We haven't taken any action based on alerts or notifications from Trend Vision One, as we're still in the early stages of getting our third-party services set up and monitored.

Trend Vision One hasn't helped us consolidate use of security vendors. This product is solely used for one purpose. We're not leveraging Trend Vision One for other areas within IT or at our company, so we haven't reduced silos. We had an opportunity to go with Defender, which would have reduced the number of products we use, but instead we decided to keep using Trend because we did appreciate it. I'm not sure if Trend Vision One has helped me to reduce the noise from false positives.

I would rate Trend Vision One a nine out of ten.

Our use cases for Trend Vision One are monitoring and alerts.

The biggest challenges we wanted to address with Trend Vision One were securing endpoints and enabling us to quickly respond to incidents or threats. This is the main goal for using this solution.

Trend Vision One has improved the way our organization functions by acting as both a monitoring tool and an antivirus, giving us insight on potential threats and enhancing our response time to security incidents. It is hard to measure the time savings but we save a significant amount of time in responding to potential threats. For example, we don't expect employees to respond to emails, chat, or calls outside of working hours. Trend Vision One has a feature where we can block all access to the laptop or endpoints. It allows us to take immediate action without waiting for the user to respond.

In terms of reducing noise from false positives, unfortunately, some behaviors can be mistaken for bad behaviors, but that isn't the fault of the software itself. It largely depends on how the developers of other applications implement their software and how it is run. We encountered an issue with another software called Rapid7, which periodically runs a command on MacBooks or Apple operating systems. This command, which is quite lengthy, searches for any unsecured credentials or API keys related to GitHub on the laptop. The way the application triggers is significant: it runs under root privileges, executing that command in the terminal for the user. Trend Vision One picks this up as a suspicious command, interpreting it as an attempt to find unsecured credentials. Despite having whitelisted the entire command in Rapid7, Trend Vision One still flagged it. We went back and forth on this issue, but ultimately we decided that it wasn't worth further troubleshooting to silence this alert due to the potential for actual malicious use of such commands. While we could whitelist it, we did not want to risk it being exploited maliciously. In the end, we chose to ignore the alert. They helped us reduce some other noise, but there was some noise that we weren't able to reduce.

Vision One AI has been very useful. All IT people stay up to date with security risks, exposures, alerts, or attacks. Vision One AI helps us explain or understand the alerts and what actions are recommended.

The workbench alerts are something we find very useful, as they help us stay informed about various activities. Not all alerts are positive, but they provide valuable insights into the detection methods and help us understand how certain issues arise. For example, if someone attempts to run a piece of software that encrypts a file, one of our tools, which is used for evidence gathering in surveillance systems, may encrypt the file too quickly. As a result, Trend Vision One may trigger an alert. Although this is a false positive, it still gives us insight into the behavior involved. This allows us to investigate the alert further and provide feedback to the user or development team, letting them know that similar triggers are likely to occur with other security systems or software.

Other useful features include intrusion and mailbox alerts, suspicious unauthorized access, tracing logs, website clicks, and email filtering for bad attachments.

The improvement I have been asking for is an easier way to create MDR requests. Not all alerts that come through Trend Vision One receive an investigation, and we would like the ability to easily request an investigation on lower-scored alerts without logging into the support portal to create a ticket.

I would like to see Trend Vision One and OfficeScan consolidated into one platform. Currently, it is the same space but two different layers. It would be nice to have both combined instead of having two clients.

There is room for improvement when it comes to support.

I've been working with Trend Vision One for three years.

Trend Vision One is stable enough. We don't see many performance impacts on our endpoints, except for when our weekly scheduled scans happen. Our developers express that it limits how freely they can develop, but I personally appreciate the insight it gives us and the actions that allow us to take on our devices.

I would rate their support a six out of ten. We encountered an issue with one of our tools—specifically, Visual Studio. One of our developers faced difficulties debugging code because Trend Vision One was blocking the debugging application or causing it to crash. This problem stemmed from a Windows update, and it took us a month and a half to identify the root cause. After we opened a ticket either at the end of March or early April, we waited several more weeks for a solution. Although the Windows update occurred back in February, we didn’t receive the fix until the end of May. The interaction between Windows and the application played a significant role in the issue, as the debugging application starts the code and injects itself into the running application, which Trend Micro flagged as problematic after the latest Windows update. Fortunately, this issue has now been resolved, but it was indeed a painful experience. Our developers were understandably frustrated that they couldn’t debug code for a month and a half, which impacted our project timelines.

Neutral

The company previously had SentinelOne before my time, and I can say that SentinelOne was not effective. 

We currently use Rapid7 as our Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service. In my experience, both Rapid7 and Trend Vision One serve similar purposes, but they have distinct differences. There are times when Rapid7 provides us with more detailed information, while at other times, Trend Vision One offers greater insights. This is partly because Trend Vision One collects more data from the devices, allowing it to better identify the root causes of alerts compared to Rapid7. 

Additionally, I find that the MDR team at Trend is generally more responsive than that of Rapid7. However, there are some disadvantages as well. For instance, we haven't yet set up cloud monitoring capabilities with Trend Vision One. Rapid7 currently handles our cloud infrastructure monitoring and manages services like Office and Okta. While Rapid7 is equipped to monitor these services, Trend Vision One is not yet at that level. We are exploring ways to enhance its capabilities, and if it can provide the same level of service as Rapid7, we might consider discontinuing our use of Rapid7 altogether.

We use the SaaS solution. I was not involved in the initial setup and deployment process, which occurred prior to my time here, but I have readjusted some policies.

Previously, it was difficult to understand some alerts. However, as time goes by, we differentiate better between them, and the AI feature is an extremely good tool that explains things that are gibberish to the regular user. The learning curve is quite steep.

It has helped us understand some of the alerts that we did not comprehend.

It is an all-around solution that includes various modules for comprehensive security monitoring and alerting. This solution is particularly effective when integrated with other hardware or on-premises solutions, such as Deep Discovery Inspector, which monitors your network.

The interface is adequate, but it is constantly changing. New features are being added, and items are being rearranged almost daily. We might have missed some announcements regarding these frequent updates. As it is an evolving solution, such changes are to be expected. However, there are still features that are buried within menus, which previously required extensive searching to locate. For instance, until last year, isolating endpoints was only possible through the search function. Now, they have added a feature within the endpoint inventory that allows you to select devices and isolate them immediately, rather than having to jump through multiple hoops to access that option.

The application has also become slightly more responsive. Regarding its functionality, the insights it provides are quite useful. The application displays various actions, and you can drill down into alerts to view the execution path associated with them. For example, if an application triggers an alert, you can right-click on that alert and select "Check Execution Profile." This feature shows you where the process started, what actions it took, and where it ended. This improvement is beneficial for understanding how tasks are executed.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

As a security architect, I design solutions for our end customers. In previous projects, we've successfully implemented Trend Vision One for customers with cloud-based assets and email servers, enabling them to extend security coverage to their remote clients.

The current market trend in email security solutions focuses on mitigating threats like phishing attacks. These widespread attacks occur across various points in the cyber kill chain process. Whether initiated from the perimeter or targeting cloud-based assets, monitoring all north-south and east-west traffic is challenging. Trend Vision One helps by providing a comprehensive analysis of these email phishing attacks, identifying the attack origin, parameters, and information extracted from attack patterns.

Trend Vision One offers centralized visibility and management across all protection layers. This comprehensive view provides valuable information for CISO/CIO presentations, including attack patterns, threat actors, and areas for predictive analysis. Such insights are crucial for informing policy changes and other security enhancements. The visibility also helps with efficiency.

We can summarize any technical information we receive using widgets and then present it to executives in a dashboard format.

Our customers adapt the risk index feature to align with the specific needs and conditions of their individual environments.

We have used Trend Vision One in several projects where our customers consolidated security across hybrid environments. The consolidation effort, particularly utilizing Vision One's AI-driven features, streamlined investigative analytics. Furthermore, merging multiple solutions into Vision One provided comprehensive insights, which proved invaluable for policy development.

The ability to manage risk and maintain visibility has improved by approximately 20 to 30 percent, significantly simplifying our tasks. Operationally, this has led to a 20 percent reduction in effort.

Trend Vision One has helped reduce detection and response times by 30 and 40 percent, respectively.

Trend Vision One has saved more than a week's worth of effort in investigating false positives.

Trend Vision One's automation capabilities have helped us save between 60 and 100 hours monthly. 

The most important features of Vision One include visibility, AI integration, attack pattern analysis, predictive analytics, and centralized visibility and management across protection layers. These features are very important to us. 

There should be improvements in risk quantification, where the risk is displayed in a quantified manner, showing the dollar value loss. The integration with third-party OEM solutions also needs enhancement, particularly in UEBA integration with Trend. Sometimes, there are blind spot discoveries that are not completely successful. Improving automation to avoid manual triaging and providing more insights on dashboards is desirable.

While Trend Vision One's attack surface risk management helped identify some vulnerabilities in our environment, the feature needs improvement. Specifically, the blind spot discovery is unreliable; for example, a missed blind spot in one environment led to an attack and subsequent investigation.

Automation should be improved to eliminate the need for manual effort in initial L1 triaging. Additionally, dashboards should provide more insightful analysis, including various mappings to the MITRE ATT&CK framework and Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures.

I have been working with Vision One for almost almost two years.

The support in Trend Micro is good.

Positive

I have worked on Exchange servers, and we are using Palo Alto to a certain extent. These were not from the XDR or EDR point of view.

The analysis shows that Trend Vision One has improved our ROI by 30 percent.

Competitors offer comparable solutions at slightly lower prices, so Vision One has room to reduce its pricing by 15 percent, given that Trend Vision One charges approximately $10 per endpoint.

We evaluated other options but not to the same extent as Trend Micro because I was more familiar with Trend Micro solutions.

I would rate Trend Vision One nine out of ten.

Our infrastructure utilizes Trend Vision One for endpoint and cloud-based security. While all our endpoints are cloud-based, allowing us to deploy Trend Vision One in the cloud, we also maintain endpoint-specific protection. Currently, our network infrastructure is not fully integrated with Trend Vision One. The platform primarily monitors our backend infrastructure and provides initial response capabilities.

I implemented Trend Vision One to consolidate log inspection, integrity monitoring, intrusion prevention, and application control into a single platform, eliminating the need to switch between multiple applications.

Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers, which is crucial for compliance. It allows us to show audits of what’s going on and keep all evidence in one place. This centralized visibility has improved our efficiency, as it means just one login is needed to complete all necessary tasks, maintaining focus and reducing distractions resulting from multiple sources.

The Vision One executive dashboards effectively communicate our company's overall security posture by providing a clear risk overview. Executives appreciate the simple visual cues, with green indicating low risk and yellow signaling high risk, allowing for quick and easy understanding of our current security status.

I immediately recognized the benefits of Trend Vision One because, unlike our other security applications, it provides comprehensive visibility.

I utilize Vision One's risk index feature to assess our organization's risk level and benchmark it against our peers. This comprehensive evaluation allows us to understand our current risk profile, identify areas for mitigation, and determine acceptable risk thresholds. The risk index feature is essential to our business operations.

Attack surface risk management helped us identify blind spots in our environment and provided detailed remediation strategies. This works as a second pair of eyes that helps look for vulnerabilities, which in turn improves our security posture.

Trend Vision One improves our detection and response times by identifying vulnerabilities and summarizing mitigation strategies.

Trend Vision One helps reduce the amount of time we spend investigating false positive alerts by 80 percent.

I love Trend Vision One for its robustness, allowing us to deep dive into a lot of information. The Trend hunting feature is beneficial, providing the opportunity to investigate and see what's happening, using frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK to analyze logs. Its risk index feature allows us to see risk status quickly and provides valuable insights into our security posture.

The only issue I have with Trend Vision One is the credit structure, which is confusing. An easier way to understand the credit structure would be helpful.

I have been using Trend Vision One for over five years.

Trend Vision One is stable and does not crash. In my experience, it has not shown any instability issues.

Trend Vision One is scalable. We can increase or decrease according to needs, although pricing changes when scaling.

Trend Micro's support response time can be slow. The quality of assistance varies depending on the issue. However, reaching qualified technical engineers can be challenging due to lengthy escalation processes.

Neutral

I've used many alternatives before, like Avast, SonicWall, and Mimecast. These alternatives don't have all the integrated features of Trend Vision One, particularly the server and workload capabilities.

The initial setup required deep diving and using resources such as help centers. Despite not being straightforward, it was manageable.

The deployment took three days.

I implemented Trend Vision One in-house with the support of team members, using resources like software guides and videos.

Trend Vision One is an expensive product.

I would rate Trend Vision One eight out of ten.

The most significant security challenge we face is zero-day attacks, which exploit vulnerabilities unknown to us. While Trend Vision One provides some protection, it cannot catch all zero-day threats, leaving us potentially exposed. This inherent vulnerability in our security poses the greatest risk.

Trend Micro handles most maintenance, but we are responsible for installing agent patches on our servers.

New users should understand that Trend Vision One is different from other solutions they might have used. Reading and fact-finding are crucial. They must ask the right questions.