UiPath Reviews

Data transfer between different apps is the main use case for us.

We've been using UiPath in plenty of business processes with great results. It's made our lives easier by automating data entry between different applications, reducing to a minimum repetitive work that everybody hates doing. Our teams have won a lot of time they now use in more interesting tasks where they can really make a difference.

• Great UX and very intuitive UI
• Fast and easy to learn
• Simple to configure with Orchestrator
• Works with most web apps and desktop apps, including Citrix
• UiExplorer is a fantastic help
• Can be used in attended or unattended modes.

• Debugging mode has room for improvement
• Sluggish to develop when several XAML files are open
• Price for large projects.

The most relevant use cases are business processes that include repetitive human tasks that make use of different apps in a common workflow.

There are lots of opportunities to improve these business processes in terms of efficiency, time taken, and error rates.

• Good workflow capabilities
• E-learning and training academy
• Fully robotized and human-assisted automation
• A broad set of applications supported
• VB.NET and C# for developers make it easy to get started.

• Price could be an issue for large projects, but that's where you'll get a high ROI too.
• The collection of applications supported can grow, but we've seen it's happening in the last versions.

Automating various processes in systems such as SAP, Windows automation, and Excel. By making generic components, we are able to reuse them for various projects and clients.

This solution has enabled us to automate repetitive processes in an easy manner which has improved our KPIs. It's not that time-consuming to automate processes.

UiPath has a very easy drag-and-drop interface, which makes automating processes a breeze. The activities make you do most things, and if not, you have the option to custom-code them in .NET.

• Some features feel a bit buggy, and older versions are prone to crash. 
• Double screen support would be nice. 
• More AI and ML support.

It is extremely helpful with our invoicing process. 

The key benefits are the reduction of the non-litigated tasks for our clients. It reduces time and staff needed to deal with these tasks. 

The automation process is helpful. 

I would like UIPath to improve the OCR visuals. Also, I wonder if one day the automation tools will be able to make simple decisions by themselves. 

It scales up easily. 

The initial setup was not complex. 

The pricing is reasonable.

We primarily use this solution for one of our business use cases. 

We are building robots with Safyr CRM. They are scheduled by Orchestrator and we are handling every step: Solution, design, followups, stacks, consulting, and finally implementation. Nowadays we are using robots internally but we will start with third-party clients in 2020 Q2.

UiPath has helped to make all of the internal business processes lighter, enabling my company to save costs in time and speed for all of them. Also, we are researching all implementation models to get the resources for a quick and agile response to all business cases within several markets.

Orchestrator is the definitive feature for me as it has the real meaning of robotic automation. The Orchestrator in UiPath has a lot of similarities with every RPA tool I have used, both for automations and machine managing. They remind me of tools like Jenkins or OpenShift UI. Simple and cool.

Since I am not an expert, I am looking to the training lessons. The training could be improved by clarifying more and more at every step.

We would like better integration with custom environments and external inputs like forums or integrations with other robotic frameworks.

We have been using UiPath for two months.

We did not use another RPA solution prior to UiPath.

UiPath is very useful and easy to implement.

The primary use case is probably the swivel chair operations where data is extracted from one system and used as input in another.

• Efficiency gains: Tasks can go a lot faster.
• Data quality: A robot is a human error-proof.
• Mood: Employees don't need to do the dull, boring, annoying chores.

The academy is free and offers a low threshold for getting on the UiPath train. The community adds to this as someone is always willing to help out or someone else already encountered the same problem and solved it.

UiPath doesn't deliver on the promise of 'no programming skills required'. It is possible for smaller tasks, but if you want a companywide robot that is a little bit complex, you need someone with programming skills. 

I am working in a virtual desktop client machine. I have been working as a .NET and RPA UiPath developer. I have an overall of three years of experience in UiPath. I have automated individually, or with a team, and I have successfully completed more projects and also got rewarded.

It reduces human work and is time-saving. I am automating the insurance based project. All insurance claims are automatically validated and verified, and it sends the mail to the user automatically without human help and without any error. In RPA, UiPath is awesome.

Overall, it's good. The selector and keyboard CTRL clicks are very useful to handle the difficult scenarios. Basically, the UI is dynamically changed. The dynamic selector is very useful to select the controls.

Debugging and intelligence window. Sometimes it's difficult to debug the code. It gets stuck and closes automatically, or the VDX stops. Might be better if you improve the debugging it has to advantage.

We run many batch jobs manually to accomplish our business processes, which is very cumbersome and prone to human errors. One wrong job run may take many hours to fix the data, which sometimes causes chaos. Due to automation, it is easy to resolve our manual batch job run.

When batch jobs run, at that time, systems are locked and users are out. Once it is completed, only then do we allow users to log in to the system. Many times, operators run wrong jobs which creates chaos and exceeds the SLAs. After the automation, I believe these issues can be resolved.

• Drag and drop feature to build the application
• Keyword-based search and accordingly it just inherits its properties.

In the next release, I believe it should include cross-platform features. Like if our product is developed on Linux, then it should be capable of running shell scripts.

Still implementing.