Earlier, there was no integration of PagerDuty. In any process, we had been working with many stakeholders and many other clients, however, sometimes if any process needed to be done at a particular time, for example, 8:00 AM in the morning, and was not running at that time, we would get a failure message. Now, we instantly get an alert on our phone, or we get an alert on Teams or Slack. This UiPath integration, with all the features, is very beneficial as it is keeping us up to date and on schedule. If there are any failures the production support team can know and handle them immediately.
Software Developer - II at Rackspace Technology
Reduces human error and minimizes our on-premises footprint
Pros and Cons
- "The solution has reduced costs overall via automation. However, I cannot speak to exact cost savings. As a whole, it's saved our organization money."
- "With artificial intelligence or natural language processing, we need to get in touch with the servers, however, we cannot do it without getting a proper license. Maybe a mode of artificial intelligence and natural language processing should be included without needing a different license."
How has it helped my organization?
What is most valuable?
All the features, all the packages, everything, have been great. All of the artificial intelligence which we are getting is super-useful, as are all the needed updates.
All the features are valuable as, much like any application, it cannot work without just one feature. For example, we have PDF automation, we have Excel automation, Citrix, SAP, and we have SharePoint automation - which makes it so that we can automate anything. All the features combined allow us to work on multiple projects or one specific project.
The ease of building automation using this solution is good. I really enjoy the flexibility. It's also very easy. We do need a few coding skills with languages like C# or Power Automate. However, it's got a good UI, with drag and drop functionality. That makes it easy compared to other tools, like Prism automation. UiPath is much better and it's highly recommended.
Scaling automation without worrying about the infrastructure was easy. I simply did some googling and looked to see which automation tools were out there and which was the leader. There were multiple training portals - including UiPath Academy, where I was able to pull all of these tutorials and insights. There's also a free forum where queries are answered. It made everything quite easy.
The solution enables us to implement end-to-end automation starting with process analysis, and robot building. This end-to-end coverage is important to me as we follow an agile methodology. We have an RPA development life cycle. This product gives us all the tools and everything we need. The requirement gathering and document preparation come as standard models. We have UiPath Studio for testing and UiPath test features for maintenance. We have the Orchestrator where we can maintain everything as well. We can see where things are working or not. In fact, we have integration with PagerDuty that gives alerts if something is failing or not working. It's really important that UiPath has integrated across all the life cycles, and that all the phases are working properly.
UiPath has helped to minimize our on-premises footprint, which has been very important to me. It's very important due to the fact that we can build a robust and scalable solution for an enterprise and have security in UiPath. It's very important that customer satisfaction is there, no matter what we are developing. It's very important to our organization.
It's a very fast solution. It can provide a result or automation to a business process within seconds. If we have an API, we can integrate EPS as well instead of using the UI. Basically, we can get any solution we need within seconds. It's very fast.
I have noticed that the solution reduces the cost of digital transformation as we are saving on manual hours. It's reducing them. We don't have to hire more people to do these manual jobs, which has helped us reduce the cost.
We did require application upgrades and IT application support. We wanted to update and get all the latest features that UiPath often releases. I've seen every month or every year we get all of these new packages. It's better to include the latest version to get all the latest features.
With UiPath, we have reduced human error. Humans are prone to making errors that they can make at any time. The bot does not. It's continuously given proper feedback. The lack of human errors has affected business a lot. The bot allows for complete confidence that perfect work is being done. It has also freed up employee time. We've saved thousands of hours. We have ten processes that are running in production. Up to this point, with those running, we have saved up to 1,918 hours from the automation. On top of that, employees can now focus on higher-value work. It has improved work satisfaction. There is more self-motivation that boosts the work, which we are doing.
The solution has reduced costs overall via automation. However, I cannot speak to exact cost savings. As a whole, it's saved our organization money.
What needs improvement?
Right now, we don't have many use cases in the field of NLP, natural language processing, or artificial intelligence. There are not many tutorials or any videos or enough insights shared by the UiPath Academy. If we could get more insights, that would be great.
With artificial intelligence or natural language processing, we need to get in touch with the servers, however, we cannot do it without getting a proper license. Maybe a mode of artificial intelligence and natural language processing should be included without needing a different license.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for the past three years. I am currently working in Rackspace Technology. It's been two years looking at it now and one year in my previous organization, which was essential.
Buyer's Guide
UiPath
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about UiPath. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. So far it's not been getting into trouble, and we haven't tested the boundaries, however, it's scalable.
I've been using the solution for the past three years myself. We also have a developer and some bigger production staff. There might be a few people who use it here and there.
It's been extensively used in our organization. We are getting in touch with many internal clients, internal business units, and getting more projects. We are in the process of expanding it. Right now, we have five to 10 business units, such as accounting, et cetera, and we are trying to expand further out to other departments.
How are customer service and support?
I've never used UiPath technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was easy. We basically had to install UiPath Studio and the tool, as well as the orchestrator. It was quite straightforward and easy.
The deployment process was just a couple of minutes. It was maybe five minutes. Not more than that.
We didn't have much of an implementation strategy beyond setting it up and working with a model via the deployment team.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves.
What was our ROI?
While I have noted an ROI, I cannot share specific data points.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't know much about the buying, the pricing, and other cost-related details.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did evaluate other options, such as Automation Anywhere, however, I have found that UiPath has a better interface and all the activities can be seen more visibly on the screen.
What other advice do I have?
We are just a customer.
At this time, we have not automated departments or role-specific processes that require human-robot collaboration. Mostly, we have unattended automation such as NOMA inclusion. We do not use the AI functionality in our automation process just yet and we do not use the solution's automation cloud offering. We also have not used the UiPath apps feature.
I would advise users considering the solution to try it once. The community edition is free. You can explore and download the community edition and take note of all the features which UiPath offers. If it suits the company, I would advise users to go contact the UiPath technical team or support team and get more information on how to implement UiPath.
The more you explore, the more you'll learn. It's not just the straightforward drag and drop functionality. Many people say that UiPath is just for a person with no technical knowledge. However, the more knowledge you have of the technical side, with an understanding of languages like Java, Python, C#, the more you'll excel as it's based on a .NET framework.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

RPA Developer at a non-profit with 1-10 employees
Good community support, easy to manage, and it scales easily
Pros and Cons
- "UiPath has definitely reduced the percentage of human errors that we have in our processes. In our system, all of the bots follow our best practices so there is a very small chance of error."
- "It would be very helpful for us if they provided more business use cases and helped us to learn them."
What is our primary use case?
I am an RPA developer and I am using UiPath to create both attended and unattended bots.
I develop bots that run doing overnight tasks and we can check the results in the morning.
UiPath allows us to scale without having to worry about the infrastructure. It is simple to scale any of the automations that you develop.
How has it helped my organization?
UiPath makes it easy to build automations. It is very user-friendly and they provide all of the courses in the UiPath Academy. We can learn starting with the basics, and it is really simple. One person needs between two weeks and one month to learn it.
This solution provides us with the ability to do end-to-end automation, starting with the discovery phase and process mining. After that, we move to the building page where we have Studio X, and then we can deploy the automation on the cloud.
UiPath has helped us to scale RPA benefits by automating the backup of all of the projects running in the organization. This bot runs every night and reduces our workload for one employee by eight hours, or one day each week.
UiPath handles all of the infrastructure updates and maintenance, which is really good.
The cloud offering has helped us to see time to value quicker. It has helped us in many ways, including with the automation of repeated tasks. One example is that I created a bot for myself that is responsible for filtering all of the spam emails from my inbox on a daily basis, and then removing them. The first step is the identification and the second step is removing them. This saves me time.
The automation cloud has helped us to reduce the total cost of ownership because we can manage everything through Orchestrator.
UiPath has definitely reduced the percentage of human errors that we have in our processes. In our system, all of the bots follow our best practices so there is a very small chance of error. The reduction in error rate depends on the process. For example, the OCR is not very accurate so the errors are higher but if the process involves an API or SQL queries then it is very good.
This product has helped to reduce the cost of our automation operations. There is more of an upfront cost but it is one-time, and then we start saving.
What is most valuable?
The best feature is the good community support that is provided in the UiPath forum.
I like that it is a cloud version and runs on Citrix. I used the cloud offering to deploy my bots and manage my Orchestrators.
What needs improvement?
It would be very helpful for us if they provided more business use cases and helped us to learn them.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using UiPath for almost two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There are times when you need to shut down the automation and restart it. Other than that, it is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I am the only one developing the bots but I am currently training some other people who are just learning it.
To this point, we have not had to scale any of our projects. Our usage of it depends on the project and where we can use automation.
How are customer service and technical support?
When other features and updates are released, we normally visit the forum to help understand them. I have never used technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have also tried using Automation Anywhere.
Each solution has different types of bots that are available. One of the differences is that with UiPath, you have Orchestrator to help you manage them.
Generally speaking, UiPath is easier to understand.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complex. It is easy to deploy and the actual setup of UiPath is not very difficult. It is a matter of downloading the Studio and creating an account in the Orchestrator. Then, you can start working.
What about the implementation team?
My IT team was responsible for the initial setup. Only one person was needed to complete it.
I take care of all of the maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I am using the Community Edition and am not familiar with the cost of the paid editions.
What other advice do I have?
We do not yet use the AI functionality but I know that it is there.
I have watched some videos on the UiPath apps feature, which lets us create automations in a low-code/no-code fashion. We have not used it yet but this is something that we'll be exploring in the future.
The biggest lesson that I learned from using this solution is that they have a very good community forum, where you can share ideas and learn from other RPA developers.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to start by taking the fundamental UiPath courses from the UiPath Academy. This will help to understand RPA and UiPath.
In summary, this is a good product and I'm quite satisfied with all of the functionality that it provides.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
UiPath
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about UiPath. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Analyst at Capgemini
RE framework is helpful and the image-based automation works well
Pros and Cons
- "We are using the RE framework and it's very helpful for delivering the product on time."
- "OCR-based activities should be improved to handle larger amounts of text."
What is our primary use case?
One of my primary use cases is invoice processing.
In this process, there are two applications including one for data and the other for the main application. The main application needs to take invoice data from the data process and match it with invoice details that it has. After this, the status needs to be recorded in the data process.
How has it helped my organization?
UiPath is growing day by day. We began with one unattended bot and we now have approximately 20 bots in production.
What is most valuable?
We are using the RE framework and it's very helpful for delivering the product on time.
The image-based automation is working as expected, using different levels of accuracy.
What needs improvement?
OCR-based activities should be improved to handle larger amounts of text.
UiPath does not recognize Google and Microsoft OCRs.
Sometimes UiPath will not work properly, even though it worked the previous day. Also, it may suddenly not work when we switch environments from development to QA. This happens approximately one out of ten times.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using UiPath for the past two years.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support has been helpful for debugging and fixing issues that we have had in production.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not use another solution prior to this one.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I began looking at Automation Anywhere, but when I saw how user-friendly the interface in UiPath was, I started learning it instead. I find it very comfortable to work with and develop processes.
What other advice do I have?
I am proud to have UiPath on my resume as it is valuable for career growth. I plan to continue as a UiPath developer.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Works at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Powerful customization creates opportunities for better efficiency and time savings
Pros and Cons
- "This ability to customize what we need has really opened up opportunities to automate programs that otherwise would not work properly."
- "I would definitely appreciate efforts to be made to build useful tools that meet regulatory standards in different fields so that we can all get the most out of automation."
What is our primary use case?
We use UiPath for a lot of different scenarios including recording daily time capture, ordering meals for teams, and more technical work related to tax and audit. The most common uses for me personally are for drafting and sending emails. This has saved a countless hours of time. Basically, if it can be automated then we are automating it.
How has it helped my organization?
UiPath has opened up a lot of opportunities in our organization to save time through automation, but maybe even more importantly, it has created jobs and opportunities for many who want to work in the tech space. This work is highly satisfying and makes a real impact on the quality of life for those involved.
What is most valuable?
My favorite features and upgrades that I have found the most valuable are the ability to create custom activities specific to our organization's needs. This ability to customize what we need has really opened up opportunities to automate programs that otherwise would not work properly. Legacy systems can be finicky, but this feature makes it possible to use APIs and get the work done that we need.
What needs improvement?
I work in a highly regulated field and so many of the features offered by UiPath are not allowed because of one reason or another. I would definitely appreciate efforts to be made to build useful tools that meet regulatory standards in different fields so that we can all get the most out of automation.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for two and a half years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use many different solutions, but I am personally most familiar with UiPath
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you are a smaller organization, use the free community version of the software to get a feel for its features and abilities. Then, once you are comfortable with how it can be applied, work with UiPath to implement it. It will take sacrifice, but the returns are great.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated all options and decided on different tools for different scenarios. These tools include Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, etc.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Manager at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
Studio is very valuable for our developers because it gives a nice visual way of developing the robots
Pros and Cons
- "The product saves time and effort so employees are spared wasting time on mundane tasks."
- "Even with drag-and-drop the product is a little difficult to use unless you are a programmer."
What is our primary use case?
We don't have a single primary use case. We use the Orchestrator studio to deploy attended and unattended robots to relieve the workforce of the mundane tasks that they currently do.
What is most valuable?
I don't think there is one most valuable feature. From my viewpoint, Orchestrator is great because I'm able to manage and control the robots and licensing. Obviously Studio is very valuable for our developers because it gives a nice visual way of developing the robots. Of course, the robots themselves do all the work. It is really a package that has to be put together.
What needs improvement?
The Insight product coming out in the next release looks interesting as a management tool, but I haven't dug into it enough to fully appreciate it.
Obviously, the Studio can always be improved. Even though you can drag-and-drop, it's still cumbersome unless you are a programmer. I think the Studio X is going to help tremendously for the citizen developers. I think that is going to be a big benefit in simplifying the interface.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the product for more than six months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There are currently four-and-a-half people in the organization involved in the automation project and I think we'll have no problem scaling that up as necessary.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have used UiPath Academy. In fact, we've actually referred our citizen developers there.
On a scale of one to five where one is the least beneficial and five is very beneficial, I would rate the UiPath Academy about a four. It is specifically for developers, so there is a complexity level there that can take a little bit for say the average user who isn't an expert to get through, but for somebody who's already done development, it's good.
We actually signed up as a premium support member and took out a contract back about four months ago. Christopher Wilkins is our liaison and he's phenomenal. Absolutely any time I called Christopher, he has gone out of his way to help us. He's our success manager.
How was the initial setup?
From the time of purchase to deployment took about six months total. We did a quick prototype that I had spent two months to get it up and running and then it took me six months to clean it up.
I thought that the implementation was complicated but that was because they did the prototype and then handed it off and I had to come in and take the prototype and actually make it work in production.
We run the automation in a virtual environment. It was a bit painful to get it all working. We actually use Citrix VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) environment and the problem with that is it uses a storefront. When you log in, it doesn't know which server you're accessing. UiPath had problems with that, so we had to ditch that attempt. What we're doing is we're using the VDI image just to read and chart virtual machines every four months and using those for our UiPath.
What about the implementation team?
We did use a third party. Our experience with them was good and bad. The young man that came in from the Netherlands was extremely bright, but he was all over the place. So he thought he knew how certain things would work and in reality, they did not. So it was painful because instead of having a methodical way of working through the issues, he was jumping about too much and it didn't go very smoothly.
What was our ROI?
We don't really have exact numbers for the return on investment right now because we are too early into the process. We are still trying to get the whole organization comfortable with the concept. But you can see the processes have helped reduce human error in the finance area. It has also saved our organization time. Anytime you don't have a person doing the manual work, they can go on to do better things with their time.
What other advice do I have?
I inherited a bit of a mess. On a scale from one to five where one is very difficult and five is very easy, I would rate the ease of use of the platform for automation as about a three. Most of the problem is with the processes themselves having not been streamlined. So if there is a bad process in place and we still have to automate it, it will still be a bad process.
On the other hand, we do experience performance benefits using the solution. For mundane processes, the people who no longer have to do them because they are automated are extremely happy about that. The benefits were almost immediate. If we had somebody wasting three to four hours producing a single report that we can have a robot do, it's an immediate benefit.
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as a nine or ten. I think the product is tremendous. We're still early in the process. As we get into AI, I think it's going to be a tremendous benefit.
My advice to anyone looking into this as a solution is to let somebody else do the deployment. You really have to make sure you understand the infrastructure required to properly scale up the solution. Make sure that you have senior management on board with the concept and then work hard to get citizen champions out there as soon as you can.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Process Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Good training helped us get started, but the Insights feature needs improvement
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Orchestrator is that it gives you the ability to control everything from a centralized location."
- "When it comes to scoring, you receive a score after the intake and a score after you build it, but you should also get a score after you build it."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Orchestrator and unattended robots.
We use this solution for automating financial tasks. Some of our use cases including reconciling amounts, such as those related to invoicing.
We run some of our automations in a virtual environment. We have been running into roadblocks with Citrix, so we run them on virtual desktops.
With respect to how easy it is to automate our company's processes, on a scale of one to five, I would rate this solution a four. Building automation using a standard set of rules is not a problem. It can become problematic depending on the data and the types of tasks.
On a scale of one to five, judging how beneficial it is, I would rate the training a four. We are using it to gain experience with the platform.
From the point that we purchased our UiPath license until we had our first robot was probably three or four months. The first robots that we created were for account reconciliation, and the implementation was straightforward.
How has it helped my organization?
At the least, this solution is making us rethink the way our processes work. Putting automations in place not only helps to save time, but it gets people thinking about where else we can use automation.
This solution is improving our employee experience, giving them time to do other things. From a resource perspective, we are staffed the same way, but our employees are able to make better use of their time. In total, we have saved thousands of hours.
In terms of eliminating human errors, we have seen an improvement of approximately twenty percent.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Orchestrator is that it gives you the ability to control everything from a centralized location. You can have access to everything that is running.
For unattended bots, the best feature is the value that you get from not needing to have somebody there to do the job. It's a time-saving benefit.
What needs improvement?
Several areas of this solution need improvement including insights, the dashboarding of results, and process mining.
When it comes to scoring, you receive a score after the intake and a score after you build it, but you should also get a score after you build it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
With respect to the stability, on a scale from one to five, I would rate this solution a four. The system is generally pretty stable. Some of the things that cause instability are outside of UiPath, or the robots interact with them.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There are between fifteen and twenty people involved with the automation program in our organization.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have used support and they are ok.
What about the implementation team?
We hired LTI to assist us with the implementation. Our experience with them was not good. They had a few really capable people, but not the whole team. They were learning along the way.
What was our ROI?
We began to realize ROI after six months.
What other advice do I have?
This is a good solution, and the availability of training helped us to get started.
Definitely, the Insights component needs to be improved.
My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is that the solution can be great, but it will only be as great as the design of your processes. You have to make sure that everything is done right to get the best results.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Manager at Vindelici Advisors GmbH
Bots help eliminate human error and better reallocate resources
Pros and Cons
- "The client is eliminating human errors as they are eliminating some of the accrual processes from SAP, where a lot of mistakes can be made. If the bot is not making mistakes, then they are eliminating errors by 100 percent, but this depends on whether the bot is efficient or error-free."
- "Studio is a bit overwhelming in the beginning. They could get add some details, but not so many, into the foundation training. I've seen StudioX and loved the colors. Please get the colors into Studio. I loved the flow and that you got all these activities and colors too. It was so much easier. It was visually easier to understand where to click. It was really user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
Our client's companies have extensive issues with SAP and getting information out of it. They have another technical ERP system with an in-memory database where they don't get the information out of it, then have to add it manually to SAP. That will be probably the first big use case for automation. So, we will get a bot reading it on the database from the Citrix environment and probably moving it to SAP.
The client will probably have it on-premise. They tend to be really risk adverse in terms of Cloud solutions. We have tried to get them to use the cloud more because it's just easier.
We are using Studio Orchestrator, and unattended bots. I have programmed attended bots before.
How has it helped my organization?
The client is eliminating human errors as they are eliminating some of the accrual processes from SAP, where a lot of mistakes can be made. If the bot is not making mistakes, then they are eliminating errors by 100 percent, but this depends on whether the bot is efficient or error-free.
What is most valuable?
You need an understanding of how to code, use the variables and arguments, etc. That was why I was excited for StudioX. I tried it earlier, and it was amazing. This is actually what they were missing. Studio is great because you can do so much stuff.
What needs improvement?
On a scale of one to five (where five is beneficial), I would rate the UiPath Academy as a four. There is some stuff that they could do better. I sampled the advanced, which is really difficult because it's just PDF. I had to use some YouTube videos to understand the framework that you need to pass for developer. They could do more videos on that.
They have three parts. The first is the foundation, and they are a lot of videos. The third part of it (advanced), there are no videos except one. That's only those PDF files, which you have to look and read through. I was like, "Okay, I probably can't do it." Then, I fell upon some community YouTube videos from other developers who just demonstrated it. This would be great if UiPath offered that, because I found out later that the developers made mistakes in their videos.
In the foundation, they get into much detail in the beginning. You're overloaded with information. You have to go through videos like three times to get it correctly. They could remove some stuff out of there. Those quizzes are really frustrating too. They are too detailed. If you sat with Uipath, you think it's really easy. However, it's not so much, if you get into those details.
Studio is a bit overwhelming in the beginning. They could get add some details, but not so many, into the foundation training. I've seen StudioX and loved the colors. Please get the colors into Studio. I loved the flow and that you got all these activities and colors too. It was so much easier. It was visually easier to understand where to click. It was really user-friendly.
I would rate the ease of use of the platform for automating our company’s processes as a four out of five (with five being very easy). I would rate it as a four because it didn't work in the beginning to get my bots active. I had to get into a lot of videos to get them running. I didn't understand how it needed to be designed or coded.
The Orchestrator training was much better, but I still somehow missed some details which I needed. However, it's not just do it, then it's done. You need some time to get into it. Though, it's much easier than Studio.
The integration with Outlook is not that good yet.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate stability as a four (out of five). I had some cases where Orchestrator didn't work in it. We couldn't login and the platform was slow.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are still small and just starting out. We have five developers/solution architects involved in automation projects. We have done our certificate through UiPath Academy.
How are customer service and technical support?
Support is pretty good. It's responsive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Our client was having some problems. They got a framework running on a scale:
- Which processes should be automated?
- What are the easiest processes to automate and more difficult?
How was the initial setup?
For our first client project, it took us five months from the time that UiPath license was purchased until we implemented the first bot.
The initial setup was straightforward. They identified several easier flows, and it was like learning with the client together. I know they are phasing out some more complex issues where you have to get into the details of HTML coding and stuff like that to get some stuff done. That is where UiPath gets difficult, because it's just coding and tech.
What was our ROI?
Our client saw ROI after one month. They realized after we showed them the first process that three people would be free to do other stuff. They got to sort of afraid of what they would do with those three people, and those people were afraid, which was a big issue.
We invented RPI and pizza. We all came to those pizza Fridays and showed them that they don't have to be afraid. They benefited from it more than not, and no one would lose their jobs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We told the client UiPath is best. We looked for the biggest player in the market and decided UiPath was the platform.
We target medium-size companies and have long-term relationships with them. They trust in our opinion. We told them our reasons that we think UiPath is the best.
UiPath is biggest player in the market. They have this platform economy going. I'm really excited to hear that they bought the process goals. There's a lot of potential there, if they integrate process automation with process mining. That is a big thing for me.
We looked into other RPA tools, like Blue Prism. We decided it's harder to learn and implement.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate the solution an eight (out of 10). They need to thrive to get better.
If you have some tech experienced people, then UiPath is the better solution because it's easier to learn and implement.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
RPA Developer at Syddansk Erhvervsskole
The product is easy to use and understand. You can learn it by yourself.
Pros and Cons
- "It is easy to use and understand. You can learn it by yourself."
- "It is saving us time through compliance."
- "The reporting task needs improvement. The reporting is boring."
What is our primary use case?
We are working on changing all the administrations tasks at the college. For example, with travel refunds to the students, students currently have to go from their homes to the school before they can be refunded their expenses. We want to make a robot which does that instead of the people doing it. I'm using a measurement tool for distance to calculate the measurement from student's homes to the school. Then, this should calculate the amount the student should be refunded.
What is most valuable?
The product is easy to learn and begin using. When you are just getting starting, you can get deep dive and start using PowerShell and other tools.
It is easy to use and understand. You can learn it by yourself.
What needs improvement?
The reporting task needs improvement. The reporting is boring.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product has been stable, so far. It is rare that it goes down.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product will be able to grow with us.
How are customer service and technical support?
I don't really use the support, because the product is that easy to use.
I have used the UiPath Academy, and it is great. The videos and questions are good in it.
How was the initial setup?
It was easy to get started with PwC's help. It took a week.
What about the implementation team?
We received help from PwC with the setup. They do most of the financing stuff with UiPath.
What was our ROI?
It has helped us eliminate human errors. People from the school doing the entry do not always follow the rules, and the robots are following the rules.
It is saving us time through compliance.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We also evaluated Blue Prism, Kofax Kapow, and Automation Anywhere.
The biggest deciding factor to go with UiPath was its community.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Popular Comparisons
Automation Anywhere
Moveworks
Buyer's Guide
Download our free UiPath Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- I am evaluating Blue Prism and UiPath for RPA for my company. Which one do you recommend?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between UiPath And Automation Anywhere?
- IBM digital business automation with UiPath vs IBM RPA with Automation Anywhere?
- How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
- What are the differences in features and capabilities between ABBYY FlexiCapture with OCR and UiPath AI?
- RPA Governance and Business Continuity requirements for a large multi-national corporate financial services provider
- Can anyone help with this error when migrating my orchestrator community process to orchestrated enterprise UiPath?
- Which one to choose, Power Automate or UiPath, for unattended and attended bots implementation for a simple RPA use case?
- Can UiPath support the SaaS model for process mining?
- Seeking comparison between blue prism and uipath