We use the solution to function as our backup infrastructure.
System engineer at Jurong Port Universal Terminal Pte. Ltd.
Easily scalable and straightforward to use
Pros and Cons
- "It is a stable solution."
- "They should improve the solution's automation features."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The solution is straightforward to use.
What needs improvement?
They should improve the solution's automation features.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the solution for a year.
Buyer's Guide
Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL]
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution. We have implemented it on around 1000 servers. We have plans to increase the licenses, but it depends on the infrastructure and usage.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used NetBackup earlier. I found its license assessment, setup process, and infrastructure more complicated than Veeam.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup process of the solution is more accessible than other products. It takes a few hours to deploy it. The process consists of setting up the infrastructure and deploying the solution to the endpoint.
What about the implementation team?
Our in-house administrator executes the deployment and maintenance of the solution.
What was our ROI?
It is easier to generate ROI for other products compared to Veeam.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We purchase a yearly license for the solution. It is less expensive than Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the solution as an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior System & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees
Problem-free and reliable with a straightforward setup
Pros and Cons
- "I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
- "With the currency exchange, the solution ends up being quite expensive."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is primarily a backup and recovery software, offering data protection and disaster recovery solution for physical virtual machines, for the local virtual machines on the physical servers using the Veeam backup solution.
What is most valuable?
It works fine. I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure. It's working fine for the local and the cloud application for backups.
The product is stable.
I have found the solution to be scalable.
My understanding is that the initial setup was a straightforward process.
What needs improvement?
The solution could always offer a bit more.
With the currency exchange, the solution ends up being quite expensive. It would be ideal if they could make it so that it was cheaper for users in our region.
For how long have I used the solution?
I started working with the solution about two to three years ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good. The solution offers good performance There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable and we haven't had any problems with it at all so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
If a company needs to scale the solution, it can do so. It's not a problem.
We have ten customers that use the solution at this time.
How are customer service and support?
We've dealt with technical support in the past. We asked them two times about an issue, and they were very helpful and helped us to solve our issues. We are satisfied with the level of support they offer.
How was the initial setup?
Another person on my team handles the implementation directly. I simply supervise the process. From my supervisory role, I'd say the implementation process was straightforward.
We have one person that's able to handle deployment and maintenance tasks. They are an engineer and an implementor.
What about the implementation team?
We can provide implementation services to our clients.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Customers need to pay for a license for Veeam Agent for Windows. Typically, it's a yearly licensing fee.
For us here in Egypt, it's very expensive, as the dollar versus the Egyptian pound is at a high rate. When we change the currency from the dollar to the Egyptian pound, we end up with a very expensive license.
What other advice do I have?
We are solution providers.
I would recommend the solution to others. Overall, I'd rate it at an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL]
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
System Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
A critical system either performs impeccably or it is a failure. This impeccable product is a success.
Pros and Cons
- "This is a reliable system that supports Veeam backup and recovery for Windows."
- "There really are no cons. The product simply has to maintain development to keep up with changes in the operating system."
What is our primary use case?
We are resellers for Veeam Agent and more people are buying it for Microsoft Windows. They are buying Veeam Agent for Windows as a solution for allowing and maximizing the performance of Veeam for Windows and they are also buying Veeam as a product. These agents are very popular. We sell Veeam Agent to 50% of the Windows customers looking for a backup and recovery system and we sell other products to the other 50%.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable part of Veeam from my perspective is the product's ease-of-use.
What needs improvement?
I do not think that I can be specific about certain things that Veeam needs to do to improve. They just need to continue the development to follow trends in the industry, the development of the Microsoft operating system, and incorporate new functionalities into the Veeam Agent to keep the product competitive in the market.
The situation with the Veeam Agent for Windows is pretty much the same as for the Veeam Agent for Linux. Agents use the functionality of the operating systems to keep a record of the platform in a stable state. They make a snapshot of the operating system and then can release or replace the state of the operating system to a stable state from the snapshot if it becomes unstable.
The difference in the products is just the need to follow the requirements of the OS version where it is deployed.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been selling Veeam for a long time so I do not know exactly, but it is about seven or eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product has to be stable to be functional and useful. It is functional and useful so it is stable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Veeam Agent for Windows is as straightforward as with Veeam Agent for Linux. Both are fairly easy to set up and it does not take a long time. The deployment engine is essentially the same with both Linux and Windows.
What other advice do I have?
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate the Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows as either a zero or a ten. The product is either working or it is not working. When it is not working, it is not doing its job and it is a zero. All the other times when it is working, it is a ten.
It is black or white. It is very simple to rate. It is a ten virtually all of the time because it is working.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior System Engineer at Vantage Drilling
A good all-round solution that is easily scalable, very stable, and free to use
Pros and Cons
- "Technical support is good. They're very responsive. It depends on the timezone responding, but I usually get a response within three hours of creating a ticket."
- "I've found a lot of difficulties on the initial setup and especially in terms of credentials. We really need a Window OS. It doesn't like the domain admin account. it's a primary permission issue."
What is most valuable?
The solution generally, is very sound. It's also free. We use a community edition. It saves a lot of costs for us.
What needs improvement?
I've found a lot of difficulties on the initial setup and especially in terms of credentials. We really need a Window OS and local admin account. It doesn't like the domain admin account. it's a primary permission issue.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
For the most part, the solution is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is good. We're in the process of scaling across our organization currently.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. They're very responsive. It depends on the timezone responding, but I usually get a response within three-four hours of creating a ticket.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup wasn't too complex. We just had issues around permissions. We're almost done the implementation.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves.
What was our ROI?
We're saving a lot of money on costs right now since we've implemented the solution and we're using the community version.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did evaluate other solutions but nothing is comparable to Veeam Community Edition in terms of license and limitation of Sockets and the number of VMs to be backup.
What other advice do I have?
We are using the on-premises deployment model.
In terms of migration, it's a pretty good tool. It is pretty good at accepting data from legacy applications.
I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Business Development Manager at Gignos
Back ups and protects data in a Windows environment; user-friendly, with very good scalability, stability, and integration
Pros and Cons
- "User-friendly data backup and protection solution for a Windows environment. The Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is very scalable, stable, and has good compatibility and integration."
- "The compression ratio and application ratio could still be improved in this solution. Reporting could also be improved, for better monitoring."
What is our primary use case?
If you need to back up a Windows environment, then Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is a good choice, because it works. This is our use case for the solution.
What is most valuable?
The compatibility of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows with other solutions is good. Its integration with other solutions is also good. I also find the product user-friendly.
What needs improvement?
Everything is good with the solution. The only thing that's not as good with Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is the compression ratio and the application ratio.
They should also offer better reports, for better monitoring.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been dealing with the Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows for a few years now. We've been more focused on the Windows version of the Veeam Agent compared to the Linux version, so we've been selling it longer.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows has good stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is very good.
How are customer service and support?
The support for Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is quite good, as what I've heard from our technical team. Support can always be faster and more knowledgeable, but it's working fine currently, so that is not an issue.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for the product was straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For the licensing of the product, it will be your choice as a customer, e.g. if you want to pay monthly for it, or pay yearly, it's up to you.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We were able to evaluate Veeam Cloud Connect.
What other advice do I have?
We've been dealing with Veeam Cloud Connect. We're also dealing with Veeam One and all the other products there, and it depends on what the customer needs. We've been selling all of those solutions, including the Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows.
We have under 1,000 users of the Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows.
I absolutely can recommend the product to other people.
I'm rating the Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Backup & Recovery Section Head at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to use and works well with virtual environments, but the VSS has problems with Hyper-V
Pros and Cons
- "Application awareness is very good and the speed of this solution is good."
- "The stability of this solution needs to be improved."
What is our primary use case?
I am a senior backup and recovery administrator and I am concentrating on these solutions.
This solution was deployed in a private cloud environment. We have switched to Commvault from this solution due to problems arising from its use with Hyper-V.
What is most valuable?
This solution is very compatible with the virtual environment.
Application awareness is very good and the speed of this solution is good.
We can power on the virtual machine from the backup site, without having to move it to the main site.
This solution provides the best storage value.
The interface is very easy to use.
What needs improvement?
This solution has many issues with the VSS (Volume Snapshot Service) when working with the Hyper-V solution. They are related to networking and a need to restart the host.
The stability of this solution needs to be improved.
We used it with windows server 2012 R2 and we faced many problems related to the VSS service, the backup failed due to some issues with the VSS service and the solution was to restart not the service but the host totally to back again in full function. it was very bad situation especially we are talking about Hyper-V host with many production machines.
Honestly, i ca't be sure that the reason in veeam, may be in the window.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is not as stable as some others that I have used, such as Commvault and Veritas NetBackup.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support for this solution is very good. They care about the customers and their needs.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have worked with many backup solutions over the years, including:
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (IBM TSM)
- HP Data Protector (now Micro Focus Data Protector)
- Symantec NetBackup (now Veritas NetBack, nine years experience)
- Veeam (four years)
The problems that we were experiencing using this solution led us to switch to Commvault. We spent some time researching the best solutions for the Nutanix environment, and we concluded that Commvault was the best choice.
I am aware that a new version of Veeam has since been released, but we needed a backup solution for Hyper-V and Nutanix.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution is easy for a technical person.
What other advice do I have?
If you are using a virtual environment, are concerned with application awareness, and want a solution that is easy to use and administrate, then I recommend using this product.
In general, it depends on the environment.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
System Administrator at Confidential
Enables us to back up data and look for specific folders or data to recover, but has no incremental backup option
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the ability to navigate inside a backup point to look for a specific folder or data you want to recover."
- "I would like to see the ability for incremental backups and reverse backups."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case of this solution is to back up data.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the ability to navigate inside a backup point to look for a specific folder or data you want to recover.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see the ability for incremental backups and reverse backups.
The size of the installation can be reduced. It is currently around 300 megabytes compared with other solutions that include many features and have less of a storage footprint.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for a few months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Veeam is quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It can be installed on as many machines as you require.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is free of cost for end users but for enterprise use, a license per user is required.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution seven out of ten.
The solution is resource-friendly and it doesn't consume much CPU and memory. You have the ability to continue working because it runs the backup in the background and does not slow down your system, especially with an SSD or NVMe drive.
I recommend this solution to anyone who doesn't require enterprise-grade features.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
A stable and scalable solution that makes it easy to back up physical servers and works fine
Pros and Cons
- "It is good and easy to use for backing up physical servers. It is working fine, and it is stable and scalable."
- "It fulfills our needs in terms of features. In terms of improvements, they can maybe improve its documentation."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it to back up the physical servers of our customers who are working on-prem. It is deployed in the environment of our customers. We are using its latest version.
What is most valuable?
It is good and easy to use for backing up physical servers. It is working fine, and it is stable and scalable.
What needs improvement?
It fulfills our needs in terms of features. In terms of improvements, they can maybe improve its documentation.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable. We can install it on all servers or whichever server we want.
We have 20 users in our organization. We are using this product, but I don't think that we will increase its usage because there are not many physical servers. There are more virtual servers, and we use this product mostly for the physical servers.
How are customer service and technical support?
I never had to create a support ticket for this solution.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used IBM Tivoli when I was working with IBM.
How was the initial setup?
It is a cloud solution. There is no installation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a cloud provider agreement with Veeam. We are also paying for the agent.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution. I would rate Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows a nine out of ten. It is a good solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Popular Comparisons
Veeam Data Platform
Commvault Cloud
Acronis Cyber Protect
Veritas NetBackup
Cohesity DataProtect
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager
Veritas Backup Exec
IBM Spectrum Protect
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus
Quest Rapid Recovery
Quest NetVault Plus
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating backup and recovery software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Veeam vs. Dell AppAssure vs. ShadowProtect
- Help! Need an opensource backup solution to work with OVM, Linux, Windows, Sql server, Exchange, Sharepoint. Plus bare metal recovery.
- What will be the best strategy for develop a up to date BCRS?
- CommVault vs. EMC NetWorker vs. Dell vRanger
- Should I get a third-party backup solution for Office 365?
- What is the best next generation backup tool?
- Best backup for 100Gbps+ read and write with hardware encryption?
- Do you have an RFP template for Backup Solutions which you can share?
- Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?