Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user605286 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
It can integrate and manage file transfers, partner management, and logging mechanisms
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
  • "Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

What is most valuable?

It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career.

It has all the features required to integrate and manage file transfers, Partner Management, logging mechanisms, adapters for mainframes, SAP, and many others.

What needs improvement?

Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this product stack for several years now.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were no deployment issues.

Buyer's Guide
webMethods.io
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There were no stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There were no scalability issues on-premises, but I have yet to check with the virtualization concepts and cloud scalability coming up.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

Customer service is good.

Technical Support:

Technical support is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not try another solution previously.

How was the initial setup?

The setup was well-documented.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented with an internal team and we had vendor support.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is worth the cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We checked with TIBCO for EAI and the MQ series for messaging.

What other advice do I have?

It is a good product stack.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Architect Manager at AXA COOPERATIVE INSURANCE
Reseller
Good API gateway and integration, flexible, and feature-rich
Pros and Cons
  • "It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
  • "There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

What is most valuable?

The API Gateway is very good.

The Integration Server is very good.

Terracotta is very useful.

There are many components that I have used.

It's very flexible and a good platform to use.

What needs improvement?

There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services. 

Also, storing the message bodies in the database and allow you to search them would be a nice feature to have.

These features should be enhanced to facilitate the work for the developer.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with webMethods Integration Server for four years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

webMethods Integration Server is a scalable product.

It is being used only by the developers, it's not for public users.

We have three developers in our organization who are using it.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, in another company, I worked with webMethods Broker.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support.

The support fees are very high and we don't need such huge support.

What other advice do I have?

I think anybody who is implementing this product should learn about the balancing and the API portal that is going to be used. You should have a good developer that is able to use the platform and understands most of the capabilities that it provides.

Overall, it's a really good product.

I would rate webMethods Integration Server a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
webMethods.io
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user1008537 - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Integrated Platforms Tech Lead at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Stable, straightforward to set up, and flexible in terms of pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is stability."
  • "Technical support is an area where they can improve."

What is our primary use case?

This product is used for application integration. I have implemented this solution for many clients across the world.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is stability. 

What needs improvement?

We have been experiencing problems with using Terracotta for clustering, which is something that they should improve.

Technical support is an area where they can improve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with this product for approximately 15 years. The organization that I am currently with has been using it for about five.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable product. The Universal Messaging component had some issues with stability, although they have now been fixed. Over that time, they disappointed the customers for about two years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We had some issues with clustering as we were trying to scale. We are using Terracotta and it gave us some problems.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support team pays attention to our issues but at the same time, they don't seem to have an in-depth technical background. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We still using IBM MQ today, although these are legacy integrations.

I have just recently started learning about MuleSoft, personally. From my research, I find that MuleSoft is better in terms of their cloud strategy.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex. I would say that it is straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.

What other advice do I have?

I have found that the home-grown products from this vendor always do pretty well, but when they acquire new products from third-parties, there has been some disappointment.

Overall, this is a pretty good product. In fact, my only real complaint is about support.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Lead Developer - webMethods, Oracle SOA Suite at American Electric Power
Real User
Easier admin and simple to learn for Java users

What is our primary use case?

  • Traditional ESB solutions using multiple adapters
  • API development and management.

How has it helped my organization?

  • The time to market is relatively less.
  • It's simple to learn for Java users.
  • Its administration is easier.
  • Extensive toolset: out-of-the-box libraries support.
  • DevOps could be better.

What is most valuable?

  • API development
  • Traditional ESB development
  • B2B development.

What needs improvement?

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Technical Director at Ecom Software Inc
Reseller
Top 20
webMethods is a reliable solution but a bit expensive
Pros and Cons
  • "With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."
  • "Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

What is our primary use case?

Customers use it for B2B integration, such as exchanging EPI or EDR documents, as well as settlement documents.

How has it helped my organization?

With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively.

What needs improvement?

Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have experience in webMethods for 20 years. We have a lot of experience using Trading Networks for B2B integration. Our customers also use Trading Networks for B2B integration.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

The customer service and support team has been good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The setup is easy. Moreover, it is easy to maintain.

What was our ROI?

The feedback we receive indicates that the value they derive from webMethods surpasses the cost.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Trading Networks is high priced and quite expensive.

What other advice do I have?

Our customers use this solution because it is well-known to them, so they choose Trading Networks when they require B2B integration.

I would definitely recommend using this solution. Overall, I would give this solution an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Senior Integration Developer at ROP
Real User
Document management solution that is stable and assists us in integrating with our system's main frame
Pros and Cons
  • "Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
  • "This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."

What is most valuable?

Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe.

What needs improvement?

This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution since 2012. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable solution. 

How was the initial setup?

I would rate the initial setup of this solution a three and a half out of five. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would like to have training for my team members, but the training offered is a little bit expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

When we started using this tool, we compared it with different tools like IBM message broker and Method. 

What other advice do I have?

Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its price. Overall, webMethods offers a good user experience and is easy to use for our company. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Yeshwanth Rajendran - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Expert at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Mature and well established but has a complex setup
Pros and Cons
  • "The stability is good."
  • "We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."

What is our primary use case?

We have some common services, like REST-based services. We have applications, general social services, and application services. We'll use the solution as a utility to share across the applications selected.

What is most valuable?

When an organization is, for example, a bank, it can't use an open-source solution - even though open-source solutions are providing more current features. They need to go for a vendor-based solution like this product. 

It's a well-settled, mature platform.

The stability is good.

It can scale. 

What needs improvement?

We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines. The rules should also be more centralized. 

We'd like to see more documentation. We feel like we may be missing some things and would like some documentation to lay out the entire product better. We need better use cases. They don't offer many examples to showcase their product's capabilities. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for more than a decade. It's been 12 to 14 years at this point. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. They have the flow language. We've been using it since version 6.0 and we haven't had any major issues. It's pretty seamless. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For what we need, it scales quite well. We don't have to worry about having to scale too large as our organization, a bank, is not a very big bank. That said, scalability has never been a problem. 

It's a solution that is generally used by the IT department, not everyone in the company. Maybe between five and ten people use it in total. 

How are customer service and support?

We have to use technical support sometimes. We do, for example, during migrations. We incorporated a business process from webMethods. We are now changing the process in terms of where we were using the database to control the business processes. It is more or less now using the RED METHODs PPM. When changes need to happen we contact them and work with them. 

While they do help, the documentation could be better. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very simple and very straightforward. 

That said, open-source solutions are easier. However, we like to have a contractor come in and take care of everything.  

Everything to be set up must be done carefully and properly. Certain changes cannot be incorporated so easily. There might be certain dependencies across certain applications. We take a pretty careful approach every time we are migrating.

What about the implementation team?

We had a third-party assist us with the implementation. It makes everything very easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I'm a user of the application. I don't directly handle the licensing. 

What other advice do I have?

I'd warn potential users that, if you get into the ESB sort solution, once you get into it,  coming out of it is very difficult. The dependencies are very high and you are running it in the middle of your architecture. It becomes something you have to budget for and allocate every year. 

I'd rate the solution a seven out of ten due to the complicated installation process. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user831792 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Delivery Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
The Insight feature is valuable as a monitoring and debugging tool
Pros and Cons
  • "Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
  • "The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

What is our primary use case?

Primary use case is to provide ESB for legacy and SOA services, Business Process Management with BPMS and API Gateway for external partners.

How has it helped my organization?

We moved from EAI to SOA architecture while moving to webMethods. Both of these decisions made the reusable services approach available across the organization.

What is most valuable?

Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations.

What needs improvement?

The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues with scalability.

How is customer service and technical support?

Average. No super-fast responses, no problems ultimately in resolving, and also no long, unresolved issues.

How was the initial setup?

Complex, regarding previous architecture and full SOA stack deployment.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Microsoft BizTalk, JBoss SOA.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Alfred Curtis - PeerSpot reviewer
Alfred CurtisSenior MIS Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User

Thank you for the insightful post.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free webMethods.io Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free webMethods.io Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.