Project Manager at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
2017-03-21T14:19:01Z
Mar 21, 2017
Cons:
Limited Rework functionality,
Poor functionality if you need Catchweight functionality
Process controls in logistics/procurement and manufacturing are controlled by order type in M3, AX has limited controls by order type etc.
Limited Allowance for shrinkage etc. in production
Limited Variance Reporting and Actual Costing functionality
Limited functionality fro managing potency of a raw material
Limited cross warehouse sourcing suggestions functionality
Limited family forecasting functionality
PROS
Nice GUI
Ease of development within integrated development suite.
Microsoft Dynamics AX and Infor M3 are both significant players in the ERP solutions market. Based on various aspects, Infor M3 seems to have a slight edge due to its specialization in manufacturing and supply chain processes, though Microsoft Dynamics AX is favored for its integration with other Microsoft products.Features: Microsoft Dynamics AX excels in finance, reporting, and workflow automation, offering seamless integration with other Microsoft tools. It provides flexibility and ease of...
Can you share the reasoning behind your consideration to switch?
Which features are you looking for in a new/different solution?
Cons:
Limited Rework functionality,
Poor functionality if you need Catchweight functionality
Process controls in logistics/procurement and manufacturing are controlled by order type in M3, AX has limited controls by order type etc.
Limited Allowance for shrinkage etc. in production
Limited Variance Reporting and Actual Costing functionality
Limited functionality fro managing potency of a raw material
Limited cross warehouse sourcing suggestions functionality
Limited family forecasting functionality
PROS
Nice GUI
Ease of development within integrated development suite.
cloudbased solution and future global use.
And html5 functionality