I am still exploring new solutions while using the current one. I have been generally satisfied with this tool, rating it 9 out of 10. With the emergence of AI, I am exploring that aspect as well. I assess the impact of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)'s integration with DevOps pipelines on my development workflow as quite good. The only area that could be improved is SonarLint for IDE integration. Regarding additional features for the next release, I would suggest improvements in the AI area.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) doesn't offer notifications, but we have some features in the pipeline which send notifications to the team leads or the assigned users to review the code. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is one of the first of its kind which supports all these functionalities. I do not have any perception of documentation or support because once it is integrated with the pipeline, most of the task is done. The people who are developers need automatic bug creation and everything is done. This feature can be improved where, once it tracks the criticals and highs, it should create automatic tickets and assign them to the user who has pushed the code. On a scale of one to ten, I would give SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) a rating of six.
I would recommend SonarCloud to other development teams. While the cost might be a concern, it is a good tool and maintains an updated list of security issues. It is sufficient for most projects. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Opting for SonarCloud is advantageous as it offers a complete package, including static code analysis, security assessments, and code optimization, all within a single tool. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
My advice to others would be to work out the appropriate gate that is meaningful and if your project has many problems. You can set the bar on high, in a way the gate forms are the same and you can lower the threshold as you progress. I rate SonarCloud an eight out of ten.
We're a customer and an end-user of the product. We don't have a business relationship with them. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. I'd advise potential users to first check all the features to see if what they need is there and then check them off to ensure that SonarCloud fills all your needs. It's a good product for its purpose. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
SonarQube provides comprehensive support for multi-language development, custom coding rules, and quality gates, integrated seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines. It empowers teams with clear insights through intuitive dashboards, identifying vulnerabilities, code smells, and technical debt.SonarQube is renowned for its extensive capabilities in static code analysis, making it an invaluable tool for maintaining code quality. By fully integrating into development processes, it allows organizations...
I am still exploring new solutions while using the current one. I have been generally satisfied with this tool, rating it 9 out of 10. With the emergence of AI, I am exploring that aspect as well. I assess the impact of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)'s integration with DevOps pipelines on my development workflow as quite good. The only area that could be improved is SonarLint for IDE integration. Regarding additional features for the next release, I would suggest improvements in the AI area.
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) doesn't offer notifications, but we have some features in the pipeline which send notifications to the team leads or the assigned users to review the code. SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is one of the first of its kind which supports all these functionalities. I do not have any perception of documentation or support because once it is integrated with the pipeline, most of the task is done. The people who are developers need automatic bug creation and everything is done. This feature can be improved where, once it tracks the criticals and highs, it should create automatic tickets and assign them to the user who has pushed the code. On a scale of one to ten, I would give SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) a rating of six.
The main strength of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is detecting the quality of code, and in the quality area, I rate it nine out of ten.
I rate SonarQube Cloud as a whole solution about seven out of ten.
I would recommend SonarCloud to other development teams. While the cost might be a concern, it is a good tool and maintains an updated list of security issues. It is sufficient for most projects. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Opting for SonarCloud is advantageous as it offers a complete package, including static code analysis, security assessments, and code optimization, all within a single tool. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
I recommend SonarCloud and rate it an eight out of ten. Sometimes, the updates for the product's beta version are simple.
The tool is simple and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
One person is enough for the maintenance of the solution. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate SonarCloud a nine out of ten.
I rate SonarCloud seven out of 10. That rating is more of an intuitive sense of the product based on many years of experience.
I rate this solution nine out of 10.
My advice to others would be to work out the appropriate gate that is meaningful and if your project has many problems. You can set the bar on high, in a way the gate forms are the same and you can lower the threshold as you progress. I rate SonarCloud an eight out of ten.
I would recommend SonarCloud to others. I rate SonarCloud a nine out of ten.
We're a customer and an end-user of the product. We don't have a business relationship with them. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. I'd advise potential users to first check all the features to see if what they need is there and then check them off to ensure that SonarCloud fills all your needs. It's a good product for its purpose. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.