The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.
Global Manager - IT Service Centre at a pharma/biotech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
2020-08-19T07:57:36Z
Aug 19, 2020
The solution is cumbersome to use. The SLS, IDL processes, like Incident Management, Problem Management, and Change Management, all could be improved. I don't know if the SLS gets improved in the new tool, however, in my current version, SLS is not up to the mark. There may be upgrades, however, we are not interested in upgrading to the solution's latest version. It would be nice to go with a tool that is more adaptable with IDL processes and also gives more connection. Integrations like Microsoft team, Outlook, or any other like CRM could be used directly instead of that tool. The reporting needs to be a lot better. Currently, if you go and check the reports in the packet, the reports are useless. Reporting is really bad. The report, when I generate my day to day users, should be sharp and useful. Now, in my current version, if I need to generate a good report, I have to have a Crystal Report installed and then connect it to my SQL database. There should be reports on various indicators right away. Technical support is not offered by the company itself. Rather channel partners handle support, and it's not an ideal situation. They should offer their own direct support channels. It should be more adaptable in terms of having the app and it should differentiate between a service request and an incident in Track-It! The solution should have a mobile app option so I can check on things when I'm out of the office or on my way to it.
Help Desk Manager at a consumer goods company with 501-1,000 employees
User
2017-12-18T19:01:00Z
Dec 18, 2017
Their self-service is not user friendly. Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult.
IT Asset Management (ITAM) solutions are instrumental in managing Hardware, Software, and other IT assets. These assets are the center of your organization’s IT Infrastructure, and their lifecycle management requires improved control over inventory, tracking, and maintenance.
The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version. Its asset management feature has been significantly affected since the upgrade. Earlier, it was able to perform skill-based routing automatically. We could set up parameters within the system and view the details of the incident or a ticket. The same functionality needs to be fine-tuned in the new system.
The solution is cumbersome to use. The SLS, IDL processes, like Incident Management, Problem Management, and Change Management, all could be improved. I don't know if the SLS gets improved in the new tool, however, in my current version, SLS is not up to the mark. There may be upgrades, however, we are not interested in upgrading to the solution's latest version. It would be nice to go with a tool that is more adaptable with IDL processes and also gives more connection. Integrations like Microsoft team, Outlook, or any other like CRM could be used directly instead of that tool. The reporting needs to be a lot better. Currently, if you go and check the reports in the packet, the reports are useless. Reporting is really bad. The report, when I generate my day to day users, should be sharp and useful. Now, in my current version, if I need to generate a good report, I have to have a Crystal Report installed and then connect it to my SQL database. There should be reports on various indicators right away. Technical support is not offered by the company itself. Rather channel partners handle support, and it's not an ideal situation. They should offer their own direct support channels. It should be more adaptable in terms of having the app and it should differentiate between a service request and an incident in Track-It! The solution should have a mobile app option so I can check on things when I'm out of the office or on my way to it.
Their self-service is not user friendly. Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult.