What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much.
Senior Analyst at a consumer goods company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-06-22T17:04:02Z
Jun 22, 2022
The UI could be better. The ease of use, deployment, upgrades, and licensing could be better. The license, not only the model, rather, the way you manage your users and things like that need to be worked on. The initial setup is a little bit complex. Technical support could be better. The solution can be more stable. It's not easy to scale. The solution needs network monitoring, and support for more cloud providers. Anomaly collection could be better. They need better reporting.
The setup process can get a little bit complex. There is new development happening, however, it's important that certain legacy applications should be supported in the future.
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-03-03T08:47:36Z
Mar 3, 2020
The advancement of this solution seems to have stalled. These types of products have a long history and it may be best to create a brand new application, from scratch. It is difficult to suggest significant improvements. The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it. It would be great to improve the automatic discovery of application topology.
It depends on the contract a user holds with the company, but technical support could be improved. We work with a vendor of Micro Focus. If you need support for the OBi or BBD, you might be able to use R&D. If we need something we call R&D and get level one support. The stability of the solution has become problematic and should be improved. The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies.
Team Lead Information Security Control at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2020-01-07T06:27:00Z
Jan 7, 2020
The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources. A huge amount of memory is required. The setup process should be simplified and faster to complete.
OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.
I'm not aware of areas that need improvement.
What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much.
The UI could be better. The ease of use, deployment, upgrades, and licensing could be better. The license, not only the model, rather, the way you manage your users and things like that need to be worked on. The initial setup is a little bit complex. Technical support could be better. The solution can be more stable. It's not easy to scale. The solution needs network monitoring, and support for more cloud providers. Anomaly collection could be better. They need better reporting.
The setup process can get a little bit complex. There is new development happening, however, it's important that certain legacy applications should be supported in the future.
The pricing could be improved.
The advancement of this solution seems to have stalled. These types of products have a long history and it may be best to create a brand new application, from scratch. It is difficult to suggest significant improvements. The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it. It would be great to improve the automatic discovery of application topology.
It depends on the contract a user holds with the company, but technical support could be improved. We work with a vendor of Micro Focus. If you need support for the OBi or BBD, you might be able to use R&D. If we need something we call R&D and get level one support. The stability of the solution has become problematic and should be improved. The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies.
The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources. A huge amount of memory is required. The setup process should be simplified and faster to complete.