Acunetix stands out for its scheduling capabilities, web-based graphical interface, speed, and log-sequence feature. Users appreciate its Interactive Application Security Testing, vulnerability scanning, and crawl-only scan options. Reporting is detailed and allows for segregation and various formats. False positives are minimal, and its scalability and integration options are praised. The tool is user-friendly with a straightforward setup, making it accessible for developers to identify and fix vulnerabilities efficiently. Its quick scan time is also highlighted.
- "I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."
- "I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."
- "It generates automated reports."
Acunetix could improve the IAST module, enhance database capabilities, and support more OWASP vulnerabilities. Users face issues with manual replication of vulnerabilities, false positives, licensing models, and password management. There's a need for better scanning speed, advanced authentication settings, and mobile app support. Cost and scan limits are concerns, as is the integration of newer technologies like SD1. Improved reporting, integration with tools, and reduced jargon would benefit users, alongside enhanced support for web services and subdomains.
- "The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."
- "There was an issue related to updates from the internet."
- "The cost can be reduced as management has noted it to be on the higher side."