Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs GitLab comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Acunetix enhances security and saves costs by identifying vulnerabilities, offering significant ROI and assurance in application releases.
Sentiment score
7.6
GitLab significantly boosts ROI through improved DevOps, cost savings, automation, reduced deployment times, and enhanced software security.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Acunetix support is available 24/7 but varies in responsiveness; satisfaction levels depend on user experience and response times.
Sentiment score
6.7
GitLab's support is mixed; open-source users see varying help levels, while paid users often receive better, faster service.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Acunetix excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting diverse user needs and cloud environments for enterprises, despite Linux constraints.
Sentiment score
7.4
GitLab efficiently supports scalability and integration, accommodating diverse user volumes and cloud-based environments for enhanced adaptability.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Acunetix offers reliable, stable performance with minimal maintenance, rare glitches, and effective support during updates, earning high user ratings.
Sentiment score
8.3
GitLab is highly stable and reliable, with minimal bugs and consistent performance, maintaining user confidence despite occasional minor issues.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
 

Room For Improvement

Acunetix needs improvements in integrations, speed, clarity, and customization, with challenges in licensing, false positives, and jargon.
GitLab aims to improve integrations, metrics, documentation, UI, pricing, automation, support, and expand AI and security features.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
 

Setup Cost

Acunetix's pricing is seen as high by some, competitive by others, with concerns about licensing complexity and transparency.
Enterprise buyers find GitLab pricing competitive, yet some consider Ultimate plan cost prohibitive; general cost rating: seven out of ten.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
 

Valuable Features

Acunetix offers user-friendly, comprehensive scanning with detailed reporting, minimal false positives, and robust integration capabilities for efficient vulnerability management.
GitLab enhances productivity with robust CI/CD, seamless integration, intuitive UI, and supports collaborative, independent branch management for developers.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
16th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
13th
Ranking in DevSecOps
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (21st)
GitLab
Ranking in Application Security Tools
10th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
9th
Ranking in DevSecOps
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami - PeerSpot reviewer
Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup
The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…
Gaurav Chandel - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration
There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.
What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
What needs improvement with GitLab?
There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing w...
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
Fuzzit
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. GitLab and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.