AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Users mentioned that AWS CodeCommit significantly improved their project collaboration and management by providing a reliable and scalable repository hosting service. Many users experienced a noticeable reduction in downtime and latency, resulting in enhanced productivity. The ability to integrate seamlessly with other AWS services optimized their workflow while lowering costs associated with self-hosted solutions. Some noted that the secure environment provided by AWS CodeCommit boosted their confidence in code integrity and data safety.

AWS CodeCommit offers competitive pricing and is perceived as reasonably priced by some users due to its storage-based charges and AWS's management efficiency. However, many users find it expensive compared to alternatives like Azure, leading some small businesses to consider moving off AWS. While AWS CodeCommit can provide cost savings, perceptions vary regarding its affordability, with ongoing changes leading to mixed experiences among users. For specific pricing details, consult AWS's official page.

• "AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
• "The solution is expensive."
• "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

Primary use case for AWS CodeCommit involves serving as a private code repository and version control system for existing workloads. Organizations utilize it for continuous integration and development, enabling code deployment to production environments like S3 or EC2. Users commit changes, push code to remote repositories, and trigger CI/CD pipelines. CodeCommit simplifies the integration of changes with deployment servers, especially when workloads align with AWS services, while alternative options like GitHub and GitLab are considered for new clients.

AWS CodeCommit's customer service and support are highly rated. Users find the technical assistance excellent and appreciate fast response times. Support efficiency and helpfulness are noted, especially when dealing with technical issues at various levels. Although complex processes are required, users value the consistent follow-up and lack of delays. The service meets expectations, with a nine out of ten rating, indicating satisfaction with the help provided through AWS's support system.

AWS CodeCommit's initial setup is considered easier than Bitbucket and more straightforward than Azure. Users found the process can take from a few minutes up to two hours, depending on AWS experience. Many found learning integration and file management essential. Installation issues were minimal, with some facing challenges with VS Code. Migration was noted as easy, and users rated their experience highly, finding configuration uncomplicated and maintenance manageable.

AWS CodeCommit is described as highly scalable, with users noting no bottlenecks or technical issues. Many highlight its capability to easily adjust according to needs, supported by S3, allowing multiple developers to access it seamlessly. It is praised for competitive pricing and unlimited accessibility without concerns for scalability limits. Users emphasize it as easily scalable, aligning with various operational requirements.

Users consistently indicate that AWS CodeCommit is stable and flexible. They report no significant issues, praising its dependable performance and Amazon's self-management approach. While some note limitations with file size reading, stability itself remains unaffected. Most appreciate AWS's responsibility in maintaining a secure and stable environment. Stability ratings hover around eight out of ten, reflecting satisfaction with the service's reliability and lack of complaints. Users consistently affirm smooth functionality without encountering performance glitches.