Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer Logo

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer Reviews

Vendor: BMC
4.4 out of 5
106 followers
Start review

What is BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer?

Featured BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer reviews

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category stands at 4.3%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)

PeerAnalyst reports based on BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryManaged File Transfer (MFT)Mar 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonBMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs IBM Sterling File GatewayMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonBMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs GoAnywhere MFTMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonBMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs MOVEitMar 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Control-M4.44.5%98%120 interviewsAdd to research
webMethods.io4.02.1%94%92 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Government
5%
Retailer
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Media Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Non Profit
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Construction Company
1%
University
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Learn more about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer customers

Related questions

 

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer reviews

Sort by:
KC
IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Jan 21, 2025
Integration capabilities and robust analytics enhance scheduling efficiency

Pros

"The reporting and the analytics that I can generate out of my schedules are valuable. "

Cons

"Offering it as open source for free would be great, however, that's unlikely. "
MF
Senior System Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 201-500 employees
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Jun 5, 2022
Product version discussed: 9.19
Adaptable, useful file transfer, and has helpful technical support

Pros

"The most important aspect is the ability to integrate different platforms. "

Cons

"Password vaulting would be a feature that should be included."
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer. Updated March 2025
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SirajShaik - PeerSpot user
Workload Automation Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Dec 17, 2024
Improve operational efficiency through workflow orchestration

Pros

"Its stability and the feature list are rich compared to other tools in the market."

Cons

"I would love to see REST API integration and more plugins for Google Cloud Platform compared to AWS and Azure."
Alan Arnold - PeerSpot user
Enterprise Operations Manager at University of Alabama at Birmingham
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Feb 2, 2023
Stable, straightforward to deploy, and works as advertised

Pros

"The most valuable thing is that it works as advertised. We don't take advantage of some of the features like we should because that's not our primary role and responsibility in the environment that we manage. We only want to make sure that a file gets to where it was supposed to go, or we pull in a file and it comes to us correctly. "

Cons

"We're only using the functionality that we need to use. However, we've had an opportunity to work with one application owner here who wanted to do some transfers in the cloud and things like that. I know that there were some challenges on that, but they finally got all that set up. There was a learning curve though."
JN
IT Architect/ Control-M Administrator at MultiPlan
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Dec 12, 2024
Good automation and manual task management that saves time

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the automation process."

Cons

"Most improvements are related to cloud connectivity."
Shirish Kamalapurkar - PeerSpot user
Solutions Architect at Kinsfolk Technology Private Limited
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Feb 24, 2023
Good visibility for jobs and an easy-to-use dashboard for maintenance

Pros

"The job scheduling and file transfer are two major, important features. "

Cons

"The solution should improve the out-of-the box conversion tool for migrations so the percentage result isn't so low."
RajanChauhan - PeerSpot user
Information Technology Service Delivery Manager at LTIMINDTREE
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
May 26, 2023
A solution offering a good dashboard and technical support while providing ease of file transfer

Pros

"Dashboard and recovery are the features I found most valuable in the solution."

Cons

"We have some issues on the SAP side of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer...So, there are some stability issues when it comes to SAP side."
MF
Senior System Specialist at a recruiting/HR firm with 201-500 employees
Verified user of BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
Oct 11, 2020
Product version discussed: 9.0
Good alerting features send out immediate alerts when there is a problem

Pros

"The product works very well with the modules. If you have MFT, Managed File Transfer, or the old AFT, you can link that to processing jobs. "

Cons

"The structure between the Control-M/Server and Control-M/Agent could possibly be improved. "