Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Reviews

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
2,607 followers
Start review

What is F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?

Featured F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 15.7%, down from 15.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerAnalyst reports based on F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Mar 9, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 9, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScalerMar 9, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs HAProxyMar 9, 2025Download
ComparisonF5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application GatewayMar 9, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway3.68.0%78%47 interviewsAdd to research
NetScaler4.215.1%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Insurance Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
University
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Transportation Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%

Compare F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) with alternative products

Learn more about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) customers

Related questions

 

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

Sort by:
Mahmoud-Yassin - PeerSpot user
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Mar 14, 2023
You can fully automate disaster recovery

Pros

"F5's attack signatures and automation are the most valuable features. The disaster recovery capabilities are also excellent. You don't need to do anything. It has automatic failover from production. "

Cons

"LTM's cloud capabilities could be improved. Cloud providers all offer load balancing, but you can't get the same level of security. F5's cloud service is still not on par with its on-prem service. "
Richard Polyak - PeerSpot user
Sr. Architect at NBC Universal
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Aug 15, 2022
Reduces maintenance downtime and has a strong user community

Pros

"The feature I find the most valuable is the support infrastructure."

Cons

"A more hybrid approach would be beneficial for users. "
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Updated March 2025
841,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Senior Technical Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Jul 12, 2022
Product version discussed: 12.X
Great support, helpful documentation, and is user-friendly

Pros

"We have multiple solutions we can deploy through the F5."

Cons

"The solution is scalable."
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Jun 27, 2022
Reasonably priced, performs well, with responsive, and helpful technical support

Pros

"What we like best about this solution is its stability. It is extremely stable."

Cons

"It reaches a point where scaling is no longer possible."
RJ
General Manager at Seriti Resources
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Oct 2, 2023
Easy to deploy, offers good stability and customer support

Pros

"It offers features Kemp doesn't provide. For example, there are predefined templates for handling Office 365. You can download them for automatic configuration."

Cons

"In terms of pricing, it could be more competitive."
PeerSpot user
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Mar 20, 2023
Product version discussed: Latest version
Beneficial application delivery controller, stable, but complex pricing model

Pros

"The most valuable feature of F5 BIG-IP LTM is brand image and recognition and the application delivery controller."

Cons

"The pricing model has caused some frustration. My clients implemented the solution and later wanted to upgrade the features but the pricing structure was complicated. There are other solutions with better pricing models."
Mohammed Abdul Rahman - PeerSpot user
F5 Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Feb 9, 2023
Reliable and has good customization features

Pros

"The most valuable feature I found is iRules."

Cons

"The analytics should provide insight into latency across various traffic routes and virtual servers."
PeerSpot user
Senior Network Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
May 23, 2022
Product version discussed: 13.1
Reliable, easy to set up, and allows us to create monitors and program iRules

Pros

"The load balancing function, the monitors that you can create, and iRules programmability are most valuable."

Cons

"Its GUI could be a bit better. Other than that, it's already pretty good. We don't use it in a high-performance environment. So, we don't really care so much about too many features."