HPE BladeSystem Reviews

HPE BladeSystem offers efficient remote access and firmware upgrades, minimizing downtime and enhancing savings. Organizations report considerable ROI, recovering investments within two years. Electricity costs decreased by up to 70% while computational capacity increased significantly. Users note substantial monetary benefits, particularly when comparing with traditional systems, as operational expenditures are reduced. Long-term clients experience consistent returns, extending hardware use beyond typical cycles. The technical support quality contributes to user satisfaction and financial efficiency.

Enterprise buyers found HPE BladeSystem pricing complex and generally expensive, though value for money was acknowledged. Initial investments, ranging from $100,000 to $1 million, were required for chassis and blades, with additional licensing and support costs reported. Buyers recommended efficient sizing to reduce expenses, as upsizing could lead to cost savings through hardware adaptability. Furthermore, licensing models posed challenges due to their complexity, and product pricing was highlighted as a competitive disadvantage compared to alternatives like Dell and Cisco.

• "Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."
• "The pricing is competitive."
• "The product’s price is high compared to one of its competitors."

HPE BladeSystem is primarily used for virtualization, supporting VMware and Hyper-V environments. It serves as a host for applications, databases, and media broadcasting systems, utilized in sectors such as finance, education, telecommunications, and hospitality. Organizations employ it for cloud computing, transcoding, and enterprise applications, including ERP and SQL servers. It offers high availability, enabling efficient management of IT infrastructure, supporting diverse operating systems, and delivering reliable performance for thousands of users.

Customer service is consistently praised, with many emphasizing its exceptional quality. Technical support, however, varies. Users note a mix of experiences, citing quick resolutions in some cases and slow responses in others. Escalation can be necessary to reach effective assistance. While proactive support and expertise are appreciated, initial attention and responsiveness could improve. Some suggest that first-level support occasionally lacks depth, though higher-level technical talent is acknowledged as knowledgeable and effective.

Users described HPE BladeSystem's initial setup as straightforward and easy, with efficient Smart Start kits aiding quick configuration. While some appreciated the simplicity and intuitive nature, others found network integration more challenging, requiring expert assistance or training. Many highlighted the seamless process and quick deployment, though a few encountered complexity with specific configurations. Pre-existing expertise and vendor support often contributed to smoother installations, facilitating rapid system readiness.

HPE BladeSystem offers remarkable flexibility, accommodating various business needs with scalable hardware options. Users appreciate its seamless integration and expansion capabilities, facilitating ease in adding resources like CPUs, memory, or entire blades. Despite some challenges with older technology, it supports thousands of users efficiently. Many organizations report effortless scaling, leveraging blade servers for virtual environments and seamlessly managing large infrastructures. Enthusiasts often rate its scalability highly due to its adaptable infrastructure and capacity for growth.

The HPE BladeSystem demonstrates strong stability, with many users highlighting its reliability. While a few encountered issues related to firmware and hardware, updates typically resolved them swiftly. Some noted minor incidents with specific components, yet no major disruptions occurred. Users find it dependable for critical applications, appreciating its lasting performance over the years. Though rare, challenges like network discrepancies and hardware failures were efficiently addressed, maintaining high uptime and resource satisfaction.