OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Reviews

Name: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 3.9 (27 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

27 reviews
100% willing to recommend

532 followers

What is OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.

Get the OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Broadcom Clarity and more!

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is the #12 ranked solution in top Project Portfolio Management solutions. PeerSpot users give OpenText Project and Portfolio Management an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is most commonly compared to ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management. OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 67% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 26% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

March 2025

Get the report

Helped 842,194 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

Mahmoud NourElDin

ITSM Consultant at Vodafone

The ease of customization of the tool means I can support multiple departments in our company. Our users find it easy to use the service and the forms. And the Project Management module is one of the best modules that they work on. It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet. It includes a Project dashboard for managing multiple projects simultaneously and program management for overseeing groups of projects. It offers various data metrics. It has project entities for controlling risks, issues, and protections. It can calculate costs based on resource tasks and compare actual and planned costs. The tool has features for scenario comparison, allowing us to optimize scenarios based on various factors. Additionally, we can manually optimize by managing resource availability, creating staffing profiles, and making payments to optimize in any situation.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows. Micro Focus provides a single place where teams can track and measure progress toward their goals. It's easy to integrate Micro Focus PPM and synchronize it with our client's systems. PPM has an API for everything, so we can integrate it with whatever tool we want. I also like the Lean Portfolio Management tool.

Read full review

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management in the Project Portfolio Management category stands at 1.7%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

PeerAnalyst reports based on OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Project Portfolio Management	Mar 24, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Mar 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs monday.com	Mar 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management	Mar 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Broadcom Clarity	Mar 24, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management	4.0	12.7%	96%	33 interviews Add to research
Broadcom Clarity	4.0	10.7%	91%	142 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers user-friendly interfaces with real-time data visibility, enhancing demand, project, and resource management. It boasts integration capabilities with tools like Jira and Microsoft Project, providing seamless connectivity and robust workflow management. Financial and capacity management tools are comprehensive and intuitive. Customization options support varied organizational needs, facilitating decision-making through comprehensive dashboards and reports. Its adaptability and extensive modules ensure streamlined operations and strategic alignment.

"The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow."
"The solution helps with tech management. It has a work plan similar to Microsoft Project for tracking progress anywhere. It can synchronize with Microsoft Projects for updating and rebooting tasks. They can also assign tasks to team members who can update progress using timesheets without a sheet."
"The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

Room for Improvement

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management requires enhancements in areas including the chargeback mechanism, managing partners, and cloud services integration. There are challenges with reporting, resource management, and dynamic time capturing. License management and support are problematic for users. The user interface is criticized for its dated appearance and lack of functionality, while strategic portfolio planning, resource allocation, and investment management also need improvement. There is a need for better integration of Agile tools and enriched reporting capabilities.

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."
"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management should move their database from Oracle."
"The user experience of the product needs to be improved"

ROI

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management has shown significant potential in saving time and effort according to user experiences. However, many are still assessing its true impact on increasing delivery speed, as the integration process continues. Despite some finding it challenging to quantify the return on investment, there is optimism that clearer results will emerge once the implementation is fully established and free from initial vendor involvement.

Pricing

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is often described as expensive, with high licensing costs. Users report transparent pricing without hidden fees, yet customer support and license management cause challenges. Costs vary with user count, offering annual subscriptions for SaaS and perpetual licenses for on-premise. Additional costs include product support and functionality upgrades. While some large organizations find it affordable, it may be costly for small and medium enterprises, and includes no base fee for SaaS.

"There is an additional cost for product support"
"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."
"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

Popular Use Cases

Users employ OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning, project and portfolio management, and tracking. Many utilize its modules for demand, time, and financial management, with customizations for specific needs. Organizations implement it to enhance project delivery, governance, prioritization, and transparency. Some focus on value-based delivery and manage both demand and investment pipelines. The tool supports project control, capacity utilization, financial initiatives, and resource management, aiding in capturing and completing ongoing activities.

Service and Support

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management receives mixed feedback on customer service and support. Some find the support team responsive and knowledgeable, rating it high, while others experience delays and repeat explanations. Technical support is sometimes seen as lacking, with users noting difficulty in issue resolution. Integration partners often enhance support quality. Some rate customer service highly, reflecting satisfaction. Enhancements and features are well-received, but technical response speed and understanding could improve.

Deployment

Users experienced varied setups with OpenText Project and Portfolio Management. Some found it straightforward and configurable, benefiting from aligning with best practices, while others encountered complexity due to specific financial requirements or currency issues. Deployment duration varied, spanning weeks to months, influenced by organizational maturity and custom needs. Vendor support facilitated smoother transitions, although some users had to adapt processes and learn technical aspects independently. Advanced configurations and consulting were sometimes necessary for optimal implementation.

Scalability

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is noted for its scalability by multiple users. Companies report efficient scaling from 80 to over 2,500 users without issues. The platform supports various user bases, from 30 to 30,000 users, with improvements in resource management, financial management, and integrations. Some users did encounter performance challenges in specific areas, but expanding usage and adopting new features, like Excel dashboards, is feasible. Client-requested enhancements, however, may experience delays.

Stability

Opinions about stability are varied. While many confirm no stability issues, others report challenges, especially after updates, requiring infrastructure resources. Releases post-9.3 have noted bugs in the Resource Management module. Some observe improvement since moving from Unix to Windows or after initial rollout, yet performance issues persist. Although described as highly stable with support for HA and minimal downtime, room for enhancement exists, needing bug fixes and better performance loading times. Some find OpenText Project and Portfolio Management robust.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Media Company

Non Profit

Pharma/Biotech Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Educational Organization

Logistics Company

Legal Firm

University

Hospitality Company

Consumer Goods Company

Training & Coaching Company

Transportation Company

Non Tech Company

Performing Arts

Wholesaler/Distributor

Renewables & Environment Company

Engineering Company

Compare OpenText Project and Portfolio Management with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Real-Time Visibility: Offers trusted data for immediate insights.
Resource Planning: Assists in managing team allocation effectively.
Demand Management: Supports balanced project prioritization.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes to improve efficiency.
Scenario Comparison: Evaluates different project plans for best outcomes.
Financial Oversight: Monitors budgets and financial predictions.

What benefits can organizations expect from OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Enhanced Decision-Making: Utilizes real-time data for better choices.
Improved Integration: Seamless sync with common project tools.
Increased Transparency: Comprehensive reporting capabilities.
Efficient Resource Management: Optimizes resource allocation and utilization.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management was previously known as Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM.