Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OpenText Silk Test Logo

OpenText Silk Test Reviews

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5
1,185 followers
Start review

What is OpenText Silk Test?

Featured OpenText Silk Test reviews

OpenText Silk Test mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 1.0%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools

PeerAnalyst reports based on OpenText Silk Test reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFunctional Testing ToolsMar 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs Tricentis ToscaMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT OneMar 27, 2025Download
ComparisonOpenText Silk Test vs BrowserStackMar 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Tricentis Tosca4.119.9%96%109 interviewsAdd to research
OpenText UFT One4.010.0%88%95 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
Retailer
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Construction Company
2%
Pharma/Biotech Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
University
1%
Non Profit
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Media Company
1%
 

OpenText Silk Test reviews

Sort by:
JG
Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Sep 1, 2024
Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

Pros

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

Cons

"The pricing could be improved. "
PeerSpot user
Director of Engineering at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Jan 8, 2021
A stable solution with good scripting feature, but needs better scalability and a bigger pool of third-party contractors

Pros

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

Cons

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test. Updated March 2025
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Mobile QA Developer at a tech vendor
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Oct 1, 2015
Product version discussed: 6.5-7.5, 2012
It's helped us to automate routine regression tests, though it doesn't support the latest versions of some UI libraries .
MM
IT Service Delivery Manager Testing and RPA at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Sep 21, 2020
Product version discussed: 20
An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with

Pros

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

Cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."
SrinivasPakala - PeerSpot user
Director Consulting Expert at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Feb 8, 2020
Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

Pros

"The statistics that are available are very good."

Cons

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."
SB
Manager QA at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Oct 18, 2021
Supports SAP functional testing and recognizes SAP objects in GUI mode

Pros

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

Cons

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."
PeerSpot user
Sr. Program/Product Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Jan 18, 2016
Product version discussed: 7.0
We were able to write Object classes for the UI objects.
PeerSpot user
IT Programme Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of OpenText Silk Test
Feb 8, 2020
Good keyword management but lacks compatibility, and could improve stability

Pros

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

Cons

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."