Planview ProjectPlace Reviews

Name: Planview ProjectPlace
Brand: Planview
Rating: 4.2 (9 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

9 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Planview ProjectPlace?

Getting work done is easy when your team has the best project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams. Planview ProjectPlace offers a wide range of powerful work and project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams, track progress in real time, and ultimately achieve goals.

Get the Planview ProjectPlace Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Planview ProjectPlace, Jira, monday.com and more!

Planview ProjectPlace is the #28 ranked solution in top Project Management Software. PeerSpot users give Planview ProjectPlace an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Planview ProjectPlace is most commonly compared to Jira: Planview ProjectPlace vs Jira. Planview ProjectPlace is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 23% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Planview ProjectPlace

April 2025

Get the report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Featured Planview ProjectPlace reviews

NipunSri

Senior Consultant Cybersecurity at KPMG

The most valuable feature is the collaboration with other teams. It allows me to see an overview of the entire project, helping to estimate how much time and effort I have to dedicate to specific sections. The risk management feature is one that I find very good. Right from the initial steps, we found this product easy to use. The logging features are good.

Read full review

Eduardo Maya

PMO at Hoteles City Express

Their support team should provide the answers fast because it impacts our daily operations. We use the app every day. We have about 70 projects managed in the app, but their responses are too slow. They can take three or four days to analyze a problem. We have a connection-related problem, which is impacting our daily operations, but we have had the same status for the last two months. It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs. There should be more operational reports. They have a set of internal reports, but they can't be customized. You don't have the permissions to configure your own reports, which is a very big issue. Currently, you have to ask for permission in order to configure simple filters. You have to ask a third party to configure it. It is expensive, and it also takes a lot of time.

Read full review

ProjectMan83637

Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

I would give Projectplace's ability for working with detailed implementation plans for projects a seven out of ten. Projectplace has one feature that is missing called Baseline. Baseline is when you can capture a committed date and freeze it. And then when you're starting your project you can keep changing the dates. We don't have a Baseline date, so it's not very robust. We have to sync the project schedule to Planview Enterprise One and set the baseline in Enterprise One which is not very useful. I would prefer it if the Baseline feature was available inside of Projectplace itself. As for Projectplace, it is very simple to use. Planning is very simple and straightforward with Projectplace. But I wish Projectplace's plan could work more like Microsoft Project for the web. The way they handle the connection is much easier. They should also improve the interface. There are other competitors like Microsoft Project for the web, Wrike, and Teams, who have a way better, modern user interface. We can't do financial management in Projectplace. Financial management cannot be done on Projectplace but it also can't be done on Project for the web.

Read full review

Planview ProjectPlace mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Planview ProjectPlace in the Project Management Software category stands at 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

PeerResearch reports based on Planview ProjectPlace reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Project Management Software	Apr 24, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Apr 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	Planview ProjectPlace vs monday.com	Apr 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	Planview ProjectPlace vs Jira	Apr 24, 2025	Download
Comparison	Planview ProjectPlace vs Microsoft Project	Apr 24, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Jira	4.1	9.0%	91%	274 interviews Add to research
monday.com	4.7	6.4%	98%	227 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Planview ProjectPlace excels in collaboration, allowing teams to work effectively with kanban boards and real-time updates. It integrates well with other tools like PPM Pro, enhancing visibility and resource tracking. It offers flexible project management features with robust implementation plans and documentation capabilities. It aids in effective collaboration and project progress tracking, supports diverse methodologies, and provides clear visibility of project status. Its functionality is considered user-friendly and adaptable for various project needs.

"Planview Projectplace is a really good solution for document sharing and keeping track of the history of changes in the document. I also like that you can have everything you need for a project in one place, for example, for documentation, planning, and even resource planning."
"It is a complete solution. It is very useful for the management of our internal processes."
"The most useful features of Planview are its integration with resource management and the ability to commit and reserve various resources."

Room for Improvement

Projectplace needs enhanced reporting capabilities and improved user interface. The integration with Enterprise One and financial management features should be strengthened. The Baseline feature is missing, and visuals require better organization. Users seek improved mobile app functionality and faster support response. Time reporting and resource planning need optimization. Enhancements are needed in connection performance and customization of operational reports. The system's current complexity impacts day-to-day operations, especially in deployment and account management.

"In terms of what could be improved in Planview Projectplace, it would depend on the purpose, because if you talk about resource planning, from my perspective, it's not the best tool. It would also depend on the company itself, for example, I've been working with another company and Planview Projectplace was needed more for workload and resource planning purposes, and I don't think the solution covered those purposes well. Its resource planning and workload functions need improvement."
"It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs."
"Planview is a resource management and project management system. Projectplace allows you to create boards and associate some of Planview's work breakdown structure as a top-level tree under which you can place cards, but there are many limitations because when you make a change in Planview, it is reflected in Projectplace. However, except for a few specific things, changes made in Projectplace are not ported back to Planview. At this point, they're two completely different products. The flaw is that there is very little integration between the two."

ROI

Enterprises experience substantial benefits from Projectplace such as improved work tracking and easier management, leading to significant process enhancements. They note better timeline management and visibility into projects, reducing missed deadlines. However, financial savings mainly stem from Enterprise One, not Projectplace. While some believe Projectplace offers significant ROI, others foresee a long adoption period required for substantial ROI, citing the need to consolidate competing tools. Users see potential with its extensive capabilities, though finding them may be challenging.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers found Planview ProjectPlace pricing reasonable for its functionality. The FLEX License offers additional tools without extra costs. Users appreciate the overall value, although some found licensing complex and needing improvement. Costs are mid-range, with some reports of needing additional staff for maintenance. Despite fixed annual costs, Planview ProjectPlace is more affordable than some alternatives, with the example of 100 licenses costing approximately 1 million Mexican Pesos annually. Users highlight the need for simplified licensing models.

"It can be expensive, but if you see the functionalities and the processes, it's not as expensive as other applications. We pay about 1 million Mexican Pesos per year for all 100 licenses."
"I would say the licensing maturity was probably a three out of five. They have a long way to go before they can scale out and retain enterprise customers."
"The cost of this product is mid-range. It's not too expensive but not the cheapest on the market."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Planview ProjectPlace for managing large strategic projects, tracking tasks and schedules, integrating with tools like JIRA, and facilitating collaboration. It supports project planning in areas like R&D, capital management, and security analysis, offering features like document management and Kanban boards. Teams leverage it for aligning work with organizational goals, creating workflow structures, and maintaining project documentation. Users appreciate its ability to manage project strategies and streamline workflow processes.

Service and Support

Users appreciate Planview ProjectPlace's website for clear support information and find the technical support team generally responsive and helpful. Some report feeling confused about the support due to staff changes, but praise past support experiences. Consulting services are described as exceptional. However, a few users note unresolved connection issues and slow responses to problems. Generally, the technical support is rated highly, though complexity in deployment and customization can affect satisfaction levels.

Deployment

Many found Planview ProjectPlace's initial setup seamless and straightforward, with the integration of single sign-on enhancing ease. Some companies experienced rapid deployment within weeks, though a few faced complexity, citing lack of ICT experience. Testing phases and training sessions varied, with timelines ranging from weeks to months. Despite initial hurdles, the maintenance workload generally decreased over time, often requiring fewer personnel. Experiences varied, but most users appreciated streamlined processes.

Scalability

Planview ProjectPlace is praised for its scalability. Multiple organizations have expanded their usage without issues, managing numerous projects and users seamlessly. They value its ease in adding licenses, while some face cultural adaptation challenges. Despite a dependency on Enterprise One affecting scalability, entities transitioning from R&D to operations find it robust. A few have experienced minor resource allocation slowdowns, yet they recognize its superior usability compared to competitors. License connection issues have occasionally impeded usability.

Stability

Many users report stable performance with Planview ProjectPlace, noting minimal downtime and reliable operation. Some, particularly in India, experience occasional crashes and data loss, although connector issues with Enterprise One have been addressed in later versions. Stability generally receives positive acknowledgment, with no significant outages for cloud users.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Planview ProjectPlace Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.