Adobe Workfront vs Planview ProjectPlace comparison

Adobe and Planview are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Planview is ranked #29. Adobe holds a 3.9% mindshare in PMS, compared to Planview’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 33 Adobe Workfront reviews

2,243 Views
884 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Planview ProjectPlace

Read 9 Planview ProjectPlace reviews

547 Views
364 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Planview ProjectPlace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Planview ProjectPlace are both contenders in the project management domain. While Adobe Workfront is favored for its strong integration capabilities and project analytics, Planview ProjectPlace shines with its collaborative features and straightforward workflows, making it a preferred option for teamwork and project transparency.

Features: Adobe Workfront includes robust integration with Adobe tools, in-depth reporting capabilities, and task automation. Planview ProjectPlace offers excellent collaboration tools, user-friendly task management, and effective communication methods.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve its initial setup complexity and expand its feature accessibility for less technical users. Reporting customization and mobile app functionality may also need enhancements. Planview ProjectPlace can enhance its project visibility tools and integrate more operational metrics. Users might also benefit from streamlined onboarding processes and better alignment with complementary software tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront provides adaptable cloud-based deployment, though the setup can be intricate due to rich features, offering extensive support options. Planview ProjectPlace facilitates a simple deployment with a user-friendly setup, backed by efficient onboarding and easily accessible customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's higher initial investment is justified by its advanced features and potential ROI, mainly suiting enterprises with complex needs. In contrast, Planview ProjectPlace offers a budget-friendly setup emphasizing collaborative ROI, attracting teams focused on seamless interactions and lower implementation costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Planview ProjectPlace

Ranking in Project Management Software

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview ProjectPlace is 2.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

NipunSri

Senior Consultant Cybersecurity at KPMG

Easy to set up and use, facilitates collaboration, and the technical support responds quickly to issues

The most valuable feature is the collaboration with other teams. It allows me to see an overview of the entire project, helping to estimate how much time and effort I have to dedicate to specific sections. The risk management feature is one that I find very good. Right from the initial steps, we found this product easy to use. The logging features are good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront."

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful."

"The solution is stable."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"The workspace ease, navigation, and portfolios are the most valuable aspects of this solution. I just got access to the portfolios from my upper management, so I'm able to look at our specific SRE portfolio to see what's a priority, look at how many hours we've tracked, and things like that. I'm not so much included in the budgeting but it's important to see what projects are higher priority and so forth."

"It is a complete solution. It is very useful for the management of our internal processes."

"Clarizen's slide publisher is one of my favorite features."

"Planview Projectplace is a really good solution for document sharing and keeping track of the history of changes in the document. I also like that you can have everything you need for a project in one place, for example, for documentation, planning, and even resource planning."

"I love the collaborative nature just from my role to help. I'm a strategist. I help manage those large strategic projects. Implementation is one significant piece of my role, but I love the collaboration that can exist within the tool."

"Projectplace absolutely supports collaboration in real-time. It's probably one of the best tools out there for collaboration. It affects the project's progress quite a bit. I have started two very similar projects in two separate business units, on very similar teams. I did one with Enterprise One, I did one with Projectplace just to see how the mileage would vary. The one with Projectplace had a very short cycle time so we were able to finish the project earlier. The one with Enterprise One was less engaging and it took a little more time. Because we were tracking the tasks inside the schedule it was not on the cards."

"Right from the initial steps, we found this product easy to use."

"Projectplace has excellent collaboration features, including some nice kanban boards. We use DocuSign, and Planview just integrated it into Projectplace, so that was helpful. And I like the fact that it links to Enterprise One, the other Planview tool that we use to manage our capital portfolio."

More Planview ProjectPlace pros

Cons

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker."

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"We'd like to see a heartier connection between Projectplace and Enterprise One. We know that's on their roadmap, but they haven't gotten there yet. Planview could also make better use of Projectplace's template capability."

"I believe that the graphs, reporting, and connection with the slides are areas that need improvement."

"It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs."

"The time reporting is an excellent feature that they can show from an individual. The only problem I see is the description field. You can't increase that field, like to pull the column and widen the column that I've seen. I'm not seeing anywhere you could do that. Because you may have some of these cards that start with the same name and you only have so much real estate. There should be a way to adjust those columns somewhat so you can look at the description or hover over it and it tells you what the description is."

"If the mobile app were improved to show more information then it would be good."

"In terms of what could be improved in Planview Projectplace, it would depend on the purpose, because if you talk about resource planning, from my perspective, it's not the best tool. It would also depend on the company itself, for example, I've been working with another company and Planview Projectplace was needed more for workload and resource planning purposes, and I don't think the solution covered those purposes well. Its resource planning and workload functions need improvement."

"The reporting end of it needs improvement. There should be more reporting, more data at your fingertips. It should be easier and a little more user-friendly. I know there is some there, but it's just how do you get more meat on the bones, if you will, of what's available."

"Planview is a resource management and project management system. Projectplace allows you to create boards and associate some of Planview's work breakdown structure as a top-level tree under which you can place cards, but there are many limitations because when you make a change in Planview, it is reflected in Projectplace. However, except for a few specific things, changes made in Projectplace are not ported back to Planview. At this point, they're two completely different products. The flaw is that there is very little integration between the two."

More Planview ProjectPlace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"It can be expensive, but if you see the functionalities and the processes, it's not as expensive as other applications. We pay about 1 million Mexican Pesos per year for all 100 licenses."

"I think the price of Projectplace is highly reasonable for the amount of functionality that you get. We have what they call a FLEX License. That means you get Projectplace, Enterprise One, and Leankits all on the same license. That's great because then you can use the other products without any additional cost."

"I believe it is a good value for money for the service they provide and the tailored program. When compared to Microsoft Project."

"I would say the licensing maturity was probably a three out of five. They have a long way to go before they can scale out and retain enterprise customers."

"The cost of this product is mid-range. It's not too expensive but not the cheapest on the market."

"In my opinion, the pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

70%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?

I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 16% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 16% of the time

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Microsoft Project vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 30% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 29% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 12% of the time

Jira vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 12% of the time

More Planview ProjectPlace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

January 2025

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview ProjectPlace

January 2025

Download Planview ProjectPlace product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

Projectplace

Learn More

Video not available

Adobe

Planview

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Getting work done is easy when your team has the best project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams. Planview ProjectPlace offers a wide range of powerful work and project management tools that enable traditional and accidental project managers to plan and execute work with their teams, track progress in real time, and ultimately achieve goals.

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Florida Virtual Campus, Amazing.com, 2degrees NZ, Kendrick Content & Consulting

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace

January 2025

Free Report: Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Workfront vs. Planview ProjectPlace report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.