Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Polarion Requirements Logo

Polarion Requirements Reviews

Vendor: Siemens
3.7 out of 5
981 followers
Start review

What is Polarion Requirements?

Featured Polarion Requirements reviews

Polarion Requirements mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Polarion Requirements in the Application Requirements Management category stands at 15.1%, up from 15.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management

PeerResearch reports based on Polarion Requirements reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Requirements ManagementApr 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 29, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion Requirements vs IBM DOORSApr 29, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion Requirements vs JiraApr 29, 2025Download
ComparisonPolarion Requirements vs Jama ConnectApr 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Jira4.115.7%91%274 interviewsAdd to research
IBM DOORS4.034.0%88%55 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Service and Support

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Government
3%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Retailer
2%
University
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Non Tech Company
1%
Religious Institution
1%
 

Polarion Requirements reviews

Sort by:
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot user
ALM Change & Deployment at MS Consulting
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
May 3, 2024
Useful for Application Lifecycle Management and has good collaboration features

Pros

"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps. "

Cons

"In my opinion, the main area for improvement in Polarion Requirements is its user interface. It should be easier for engineers to understand how it works, as many features are not very easily understandable for end-users. "
JuanCarlos Lopez - PeerSpot user
Chief Technology Officer at Maval
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Sep 4, 2023
Defines, builds, tests and manages complex software systems

Cons

"We encountered numerous challenges, such as issues with requirements, project management, timing, and planning. The main problem with Polarion at the outset, I believe, was our limited understanding of the planning phase. During that time, we were more focused on change management related to requirements. Recognizing the importance of planning has been a key realization for us. Another mistake we made was not comprehending the need to document these requirements to manage all the work items effectively. Now, we understand the significance of this documentation. As a result of these insights, we have started to see a growing number of competitors from Polarion in this field. One potential improvement could be enabling Polarion to export work items not just to Microsoft Office but also to other office tools."
Find out what your peers are saying about Polarion Requirements. Updated April 2025
849,475 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Wellhead Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Jan 20, 2024
Multiple team members can collaborate on a document, making it easy to track changes, add comments, and work on drafts collectively

Pros

"My company mainly utilizes the product for documenting internal standards, guidelines, and requirements. Currently, we're focusing on using it for internal purposes, but the vision is to expand its usage to include contract requirements and tracking functionalities. While we're not there yet, it has proven effective for managing our internal documentation needs. "

Cons

"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually. "
NK
System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Apr 9, 2024
Flexible tool and give top management an easy view of the product status or how the requirements process is going

Pros

"We can easily customize it because of the web services and open APIs. Also, the APIs are available. We integrated Polarion with one of Siemens' products, Teamcenter, which is especially useful for automotive industries. There is an open API for integration with Jira as well, so for me, customization is a strong point."

Cons

"The risk assessment functionality needs improvement, like FMEA risk management. "
PeerSpot user
PLM Senior Advisor at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Nov 27, 2022
Powerful, configurable, solid performance, and top class technical support

Pros

"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."

Cons

"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."
Sutapa Ghosh - PeerSpot user
Senior Tech Manager at Technology and Strategy
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Nov 21, 2023
A well-designed solution that helps with organization, but its usability needs to be improved

Pros

"The solution is especially great for organizing folders effectively."

Cons

"The usability of the solution should also be improved."
Priya Gupta - PeerSpot user
Senior R&D Engineer at Vanderlande
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Feb 18, 2023
Product version discussed: 21
Makes test engineering easier but integration can be tricky

Pros

"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."

Cons

"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."
Michael Sanchez - PeerSpot user
ALM Change & Deployment at MS Consulting
Verified user of Polarion Requirements
Dec 23, 2020
Good flexibility, good price, useful APIs, and very stable

Pros

"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."

Cons

"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."