IBM DOORS Reviews

Name: IBM DOORS
Brand: IBM
Rating: 4 (52 reviews)

Vendor: IBM

4.0 out of 5

52 reviews
89% willing to recommend

966 followers

Post review

What is IBM DOORS?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (DOORS) is a Requirements Management (RM) software designed to help organizations manage engineering project requirements throughout the development lifecycle. It provides a central location for capturing, defining, and organizing project requirements, facilitating communication and collaboration among stakeholders like engineers, system designers, and customers. Key features include requirements traceability, version control, and impact analysis, ensuring effective implementation and testing. DOORS improves efficiency, enhances communication, reduces risks, and supports better decision-making through clear visibility into requirements. Compared to its newer, web-based counterpart DOORS Next, the mature DOORS 9 offers a wider range of features with a traditional user interface but lacks web-based functionality and modern integration with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) tools.

Get the IBM DOORS Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM DOORS, Jira, Jama Connect and more!

IBM DOORS is the #1 ranked solution in top Application Requirements Management solutions. PeerSpot users give IBM DOORS an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. IBM DOORS is most commonly compared to Jira: IBM DOORS vs Jira. IBM DOORS is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 73% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 23% of all views.

Helped 790,361 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

MarioCataldi

Senior Consultant Bip - Business Integration Partners at Business Integration Partners

The biggest improvement for me is definitely the ability to use DOORS in a web environment through Rational DOORS Next Generation. Integrating with Rational Team Concert via the web interface has also been beneficial. However, not all Rational Team Concert operations are available from the web client. Certain operations, like creating streams or components, still require using the desktop application. They're not accessible through the web interface. And in my opinion, this limitation should be removed. Creating streams, components, etc. We still need the desktop app for those. DOORS has enabled flexibility in mapping requirements to the software. Tracking changes over time due to team meetings and other factors is important. Additionally, I've been using DOORS Next Generation, the web-based tool, especially in the last year.

Read full review

SanthoshM

Team Lead Technical Architect at Vitesco

We use the solution internally in our organization The product creates an ID for each requirement update. It is very detailed. The product enables users to divide the requirements and export them. So, I need not give my customers access to my database. They can review it and send it back. The…

Read full review

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI

Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

IBM DOORS effectively synchronizes with Polarion. But suppose when Polarion is running on Linux and you want to integrate with IBM DOORS on Windows, that is when compatibility issues arise. For the aforementioned issue we often receive advise in our company to migrate Polarion to Windows before integration. IBM DOORS is a heavy-duty application compared to competitors such as PTC Integrity. Exporting an IBM DOORS module is highly time-consuming for its bulkiness. PTC Integrity is a lighter solution that allows the development of a gateway template. It's crucial to consider the use cases and the other vendors that need to be integrated before using IBM DOORS. Our company is a PTC competence center, so most of our customers are from PTC. The customer integrations our company deals with include modeling tools such as Simulink, MATLAB, and Integrity Modeler to synchronize documents. The digital threat maintenance between IOD and Windchill is also a crucial part of our organization's operations. The solution should be more compatible with thin clients, there should be focus on web-based clients who can be more effective in IBM DOORS. At our company, we don't want every customer to use the thick client format with the solution. I would like to witness the seamless integration of IBM DOORS with Windchill in the future version. The integrations in IBM DOORS should be web-based, I don't prefer to use multiple plug-ins. For example, I want to integrate IBM DOORS with MATLAB, Simulink and Jenkins effortlessly which is possible in Codebeamer. I want every feature of Codebeamer to be present in IBM DOORS in the future releases.

Read full review

IBM DOORS mindshare

As of July 2024, the mindshare of IBM DOORS in the Application Requirements Management category stands at 36.9%, up from 34.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Requirements Management

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jun 19, 2024

Valuable Features

"IBM DOORS has a well-refined ASPICE template"
"The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes.It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements."
"The next-generation features are good."

Room for Improvement

"The solution should be more compatible with thin clients"
"Not all Rational Team Concert operations are available from the web client. Certain operations, like creating streams or components, still require using the desktop application. They're not accessible through the web interface.And in my opinion, this limitation should be removed."
"The customer must also have the tool to import the changes and accept them as a part of the review."

Pricing

"IBM DOORS is available at a reasonable price"
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."
"The licensing cost is too high."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our IBM DOORS Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.