IBM DOORS vs OpenText Dimensions RM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM DOORS
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Dimensions RM
Ranking in Application Requirements Management
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Application Requirements Management category, the mindshare of IBM DOORS is 36.9%, up from 34.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dimensions RM is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Requirements Management
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

JK
Jul 15, 2022
Good exporting functions, proven scalability, but technical support needs improvement
There are numerous projects that we are using with IBM Rational DOORS. They are isolated from each other and then we receive requirements from outside sources, load them into DOORS, and use them to do traceability into architectures developed in MagicDraw It has improved our ability to do…
Use OpenText Dimensions RM?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
"The licensing cost is too high."
"Pricing can vary depending on the size of the organization and how contracts are negotiated."
"IBM DOORS is available at a reasonable price"
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive."
"I don't personally know what the numbers are. I just know that one of the reasons we've limited it to three seats is a function of cost."
"IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive."
"It's expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
790,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Computer Software Company
13%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
7%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
25%
Transportation Company
13%
Healthcare Company
9%
Logistics Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational DOORS?
The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Rational DOORS?
I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive. It was a little bit expensive.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational DOORS?
The modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool like DOORS Next Generation, integrated with Rhapsody. So, integration between Rhapsody modeling and DOORS in the web tool. Another area...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Rational DOORS
Micro Focus Dimensions RM, Serena Dimensions RM
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), MdPnP.org
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: June 2024.
790,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.