Rapid7 Metasploit Reviews

Enterprise users express mixed views on Rapid7 Metasploit's pricing. Many appreciate the open-source version, finding it cost-effective for their needs. Those using the Pro version note its reasonable pricing, though some suggest additional discounts. Licensing is user-based, with Pro users paying a one-time fee of approximately $20,000 or €20,000, plus a 35% annual support cost. Some companies consider it cheaper than alternatives like Tenable.io but are exploring replacements due to budget constraints.

• "I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."
• "Rapid7 Metasploit is an open-source solution."
• "It is a reasonably priced solution. I would rate it from five out of ten."

Organizations primarily use Rapid7 Metasploit for penetration testing and vulnerability detection. They assess internal systems, networks, and information assets to identify exploitable weaknesses. Metasploit is deployed at client sites, integrated with governmental agencies, and used in phishing detection. It helps optimize vulnerability management by validating findings, automating processes, and enabling testing by teams. Some users employ it for scanning systems managed through Rapid7 InsightVM while detecting and preventing attacks. Rapid7 Metasploit is instrumental in exposing vulnerabilities.

Rapid7 Metasploit's customer support receives mixed feedback. Some find it sluggish and unpredictable, especially compared to Cisco. While assistance can be helpful, delays are common. Community edition users rely on open-source resources due to lack of support. Though some praise the support's responsiveness and helpfulness, others experience significant delays. Users suggest online resources are beneficial, but the commercial edition might offer better assistance.

Rapid7 Metasploit's initial setup is generally described as straightforward. Many users find it easy, requiring minimal time and effort, often manageable by a single person within about 30 minutes. Some users note it can be slightly challenging for those without a technical background and may involve uninstalling antivirus or disabling firewalls. Users with technical expertise typically have no issues and appreciate the clear documentation available for guidance.

Rapid7 Metasploit's scalability varies among users. While some find it sufficient for their needs, others suggest improvements in automation and hybrid environments. Organizations with small to medium teams manage scalability, though challenges arise with automation due to the nature of penetration testing. Many users report it scales adequately, although some rate its expansion capabilities lower, indicating room for enhancement.

Many users have noted that the stability of Rapid7 Metasploit has improved with the latest version, resolving past issues. They find it robust, reliable, and free from bugs, glitches, or crashes. Users generally rate its stability between seven to nine out of ten, indicating some room for improvement. While some experienced past instability, the consensus highlights stability satisfaction, with multiple users affirming their confidence in its current stable state.