It includes activity monitoring, sensitive data threat detection, and discovery, all of which fall under the 10101 Umbrella. Additionally, because of unstructured data, there's overexposed access.
We use the tools that come with it, such as data classification and real-time active alerting.
We're in the process of maturing the incident response for our team. We're transitioning from on-prem to the cloud and are now evaluating it for the cloud as well as Defender for Cloud and all of its components. So, we're doing a comparison of that.
The most effective feature for me is its ability to identify sensitive areas, allowing you to drill down into the sensitive data, provided you have access, to determine whether it's a false positive or a true positive.
That's the best thing for me, out of all of it. It's got everything, like other ones, but I like to be able to look at something if I'm doing forensics on the alert and say, "Okay, do I really need to do something with this?"
For example, we don't want sensitive data in our OneDrive. So it identifies the sensitive data that's possibly in the OneDrive. And what I can do is look at it and identify whether it's actually sensitive data in Datalert or whether it looks like sensitive data, but I know it's a false positive.
If it is a false positive, I can basically say ignore this pattern based on X, Y, and Z, you know, whether it's Redjax or keyword proximity. So I like that.
With other tools, I gotta go through a whole process because it's a little bit more complex.
Here, I can tag it and bag it in one shot. And the next good time I scan, it slips over it. So it helps in that.
For me, it's more about performance, but that's being resolved with certain issues. And it's just because of the volume of data that we're putting through it.
I have been using it for three years.
I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.
I had concerns with performance. Especially with the new product plugins for monitoring, considering how Windows always has quirks in the Office 365 environment.
The SaaS version is highly scalable.
The company has over 10,000 people, and currently, four or five are using it. We're looking into self-service for reporting and governance and normalizing the data into a data lake solution.
I have a direct line, a red phone direct line to them. Nothing but a good experience here.
The initial setup is straightforward. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a five out of ten only because I wasn't used to it. I've worked with IBM Guardian and BigFix before.
Since I was really familiar with those two products, as a consultant, I could install them in less than a week as long as I had all the configuration requirements done. Most of its configuration requirements. Other than that, it's straightforward in installations.
There were seven people involved in the deployment. We had someone for global access reviews, another for scale data, one for maintaining the environment, architects for the installations, and an operations guide for updates.
We have only one person for maintenance.
It was a negotiation based on my past experiences with monitoring this type of software.
I don't know the exact amount. It's pricey, not for a small company. It's Fortune 500 type of software.
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive.
For unstructured data monitoring, it's one of the top ones, if not the top one, due to its usability. The telemetry to capture everything and the reports are very easy to configure without having a developer degree.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.