Customers use the product to identify sensitive information, correlate it with access permissions, and utilize its automation engine for remediation. It includes fixing broken permissions and managing global access. In healthcare settings, the data privilege module allows for implementing the least privilege and simplifies permission management. It also provides effective data alerting and reporting for both on-premises and cloud environments like Microsoft 365.
The solution's areas of improvement are the interface and the dependency on on-premises deployment for some components.
The interface has improved with the move to a SaaS model, but aspects could still be modernized. Additionally, some elements, like the data privilege module, still require on-premises deployment.
I have worked with Varonis platform for approximately two and a half years.
The product is stable. However, issues related to component deployment and latency between collectors and data sources may arise. Increasing resources on these components typically resolves performance issues.
The product's scalability is managed automatically with the SaaS deployment.
It depends on the capacity of components like SQL servers and collectors for on-premises setups. Adding more collectors can help handle increased data loads.
Overall, customer support is good. However, there can be delays in issue resolution, with some problems requiring multiple sessions to resolve.
Varonis and Microsoft's solutions, particularly in data classification and protection, complement each other.
Microsoft's offerings, especially if included in an E5 license, provide a comprehensive and cost-effective solution. Varonis excels in classification and integration with Microsoft's tools but is generally more expensive.
The installation is relatively straightforward, but estimating the duration for remediation tasks can be challenging. The setup involves adding targets and basic configuration, which typically takes between seven days to two weeks. Ongoing engagement is crucial to ensure the platform remains effective and provides value.
The ROI can be high initially, especially if the platform is used for significant remediation tasks. Over time, as automation tasks become routine, the perceived ROI may diminish. The expanding feature set and competition from other solutions may also impact the ROI.
The platform is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten.
The solution's classification engine is highly configurable and efficient. It provides good reporting and visualization, which is superior to previous tools like Microsoft's. The platform's data alerting capabilities and automation features for managing broken permissions are particularly notable.
It offers robust automation capabilities, including global permission repair, broken access repairs, and data transport engine features for archiving and migration. The automation tools are useful for managing permissions and performing cleanup tasks efficiently.
It provides strong reporting capabilities that help customers adhere to regulations and maintain compliance. Automating reporting is beneficial for maintaining robust governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) posture.
It does incorporate some AI elements, particularly in its data alerting module. However, AI integration has yet to be the primary focus of my implementations. AI is expected to play a larger role in future enhancements.
I recommend Varonis, particularly its effectiveness in performing data security remediation tasks. Despite its high cost, it is valuable for its capabilities and the lack of impact on end users.
Overall, I rate it a nine out of ten.