Control-M excels in comprehensive automation and robust integration options, making it ideal for feature-rich operations. In comparison, AppWorx Workload Automation offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to cost-conscious buyers needing scalable solutions in complex enterprise environments.
A tech buyer might choose Tidal by Redwood for its pricing, user-friendly deployment, and strong customer support. In comparison, they might select AppWorx Workload Automation for its advanced feature set and comprehensive integration options, although it may involve higher costs and more complex deployment.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost.
Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs.
OpCon automates batch processing, core system operations, file transfers, and daily processing. Integrated across Unisys, Windows, and cloud systems, OpCon is used in financial institutions, credit unions, and multi-platform environments for job scheduling, report generation, SQL queries, scripting, and FTP processes, handling thousands of jobs daily.
Users value OpCon for comprehensive automation capabilities, particularly the scheduling feature that allows advance planning and streamlined workflows. The self-service functionality enables non-IT staff to manage tasks efficiently. OpCon's integration with core banking systems, robust job management, and error notification system significantly improve operational efficiency. Features like Solution Manager enhance accessibility and control, ensuring process continuity and ease of use.
This solution is certainly not the cheapest, but we win in time.
Yearly, it's around $30,000.
This solution is certainly not the cheapest, but we win in time.
Yearly, it's around $30,000.
ActiveBatch by Redwood is used for data processing, automation, job scheduling, file transfers, server monitoring, and platform integration. It supports calculations, reporting, updates, and IT operations. Users benefit from centralized management and real-time monitoring. Improvements needed include better documentation, cloud support, UI, triggers, dashboards, reporting, and machine learning features.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking.
It allows for lower operational overhead.
AppWorx is noted for its robust scheduling, reliability, and flexible scripting. In comparison, Fortra\'s JAMS features advanced job monitoring, cross-platform support, and extensive third-party integrations. Both products have distinctly different strengths that appeal to buyers based on specific needs and technical priorities.
It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year.
This is a good product at a fair price.
It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year.
This is a good product at a fair price.
