Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Firewall Logo

Top 10 Azure Firewall Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
3.7 out of 5
1,577 followers
Start review

Top Azure Firewall Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Firewall based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Azure Firewall surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, seamless integration with Azure services, centralized management, and high availability, ensuring robust network protection and streamlined operations for enterprises leveraging cloud-based security solutions.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Azure Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate offers comprehensive security features, advanced threat protection, and detailed analytics, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels in scalability, cloud integration, and automation, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing cloud-centric environments and seamless Azure ecosystem integration.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are generally high and can include additional expenses for maintenance, while Azure Firewall offers a straightforward setup with predictable cloud-based pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are generally high and can include additional expenses for maintenance, while Azure Firewall offers a straightforward setup with predictable cloud-based pricing.
Azure Firewall Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers granular control and customizability with its rich feature set and low initial setup costs. In comparison, Azure Firewall ensures seamless cloud integration with advanced threat intelligence and automated rule setting, ideal for Azure-centric enterprises. Netgate pfSense requires improved documentation, while Azure Firewall needs lower costs.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Netgate pfSense Report
Netgate pfSense offers a low initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall has a higher setup cost reflecting its extensive integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense offers a low initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall has a higher setup cost reflecting its extensive integration features.
Azure Firewall Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
OPNsense offers robust firewall functionalities and extensive plugins, while Azure Firewall excels with seamless integration into Azure services and scalability. In comparison, OPNsense is flexible and customizable, whereas Azure Firewall provides advanced threat protection and greater ROI for organizations leveraging Azure services.
Download Azure Firewall vs. OPNsense Report
OPNsense offers lower setup costs compared to Azure Firewall, which tends to be more expensive due to its extensive cloud integration features. OPNsense is ideal for budget-conscious users, whereas Azure Firewall justifies its higher setup cost with comprehensive enterprise-grade services.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense offers lower setup costs compared to Azure Firewall, which tends to be more expensive due to its extensive cloud integration features. OPNsense is ideal for budget-conscious users, whereas Azure Firewall justifies its higher setup cost with comprehensive enterprise-grade services.
Azure Firewall Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Sophos XG
4.1 out of 5
Sophos XG offers comprehensive security features with granular policy customization, ideal for detailed network management. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels in scalability and integration with Azure services, appealing to those prioritizing seamless cloud-native deployment and threat intelligence filtering in cloud environments.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Sophos XG Report
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, which could be a deciding factor for businesses focused on initial investment. Azure Firewall, despite its higher setup cost, offers robust integration features for cloud environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, which could be a deciding factor for businesses focused on initial investment. Azure Firewall, despite its higher setup cost, offers robust integration features for cloud environments.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5

The preferred product is Cisco Secure Firewall over Azure Firewall due to its quicker setup process, intuitive user interface, and seamless integration with other Cisco security products. Users found the customer service provided by Cisco Secure Firewall to be efficient and reliable.

Download Azure Firewall vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report
Cisco Secure Firewall's setup cost is praised for its straightforwardness, offering users value for money. Azure Firewall's competitive pricing and reasonable setup cost are highlighted, with flexible licensing options catering to diverse organizational needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall's setup cost is praised for its straightforwardness, offering users value for money. Azure Firewall's competitive pricing and reasonable setup cost are highlighted, with flexible licensing options catering to diverse organizational needs.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer comprehensive security features like application visibility and advanced threat protection, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive protection. In comparison, Azure Firewall integrates well with Azure services, providing easier deployment and scalability, attracting those invested in the Azure ecosystem.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, making the former more suitable for organizations with substantial security budgets while the latter appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have a higher setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, making the former more suitable for organizations with substantial security budgets while the latter appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions.
Azure Firewall Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Check Point NGFW
4.4 out of 5
Check Point NGFW excels with advanced security and application control, ideal for integrated operations. In comparison, Azure Firewall provides essential features, more cost-effective for cloud platforms but lacks deep application-layer controls, potentially limiting its comprehensive enterprise security capabilities.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Check Point NGFW Report
Check Point NGFW's setup cost is notably higher than Azure Firewall, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements. Azure Firewall offers a more budget-friendly setup, making Check Point NGFW the costlier option in comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point NGFW's setup cost is notably higher than Azure Firewall, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements. Azure Firewall offers a more budget-friendly setup, making Check Point NGFW the costlier option in comparison.
Azure Firewall Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox attracts tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and ease of integration. In comparison, Azure Firewall is chosen for cloud-native security and scalability. WatchGuard Firebox's straightforward deployment contrasts with Azure Firewall's superior support infrastructure. Azure Firewall's higher pricing is justified by its advanced capabilities.
Download Azure Firewall vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox incurs a higher setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
3.9 out of 5
Juniper SRX Series Firewall is valued for robust performance and flexibility in enterprise routing and firewall services. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels in cloud-native features with seamless Azure integration, appealing to businesses prioritizing scalable cloud solutions over complex on-premises setups.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall Report
Juniper SRX Series Firewall typically involves a higher initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall provides a more cost-effective setup option suitable for seamless cloud integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper SRX Series Firewall typically involves a higher initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall provides a more cost-effective setup option suitable for seamless cloud integration.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
FortiGate-VM excels in robust security features and high performance. In comparison, Azure Firewall stands out for seamless integration with Azure services and scalability. FortiGate-VM could benefit from enhanced analytics. Azure Firewall needs improved threat intelligence and update speed. FortiGate-VM is cost-effective, while Azure Firewall offers superior integration.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower initial setup cost, making it suitable for smaller budgets, while Azure Firewall features a higher installation expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities and integration with other Azure services.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has a lower initial setup cost, making it suitable for smaller budgets, while Azure Firewall features a higher installation expense, reflecting its advanced capabilities and integration with other Azure services.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Untangle NG Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Untangle NG Firewall is praised for its interface, application control, and simplicity in deployment, making it ideal for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Azure Firewall provides advanced security features, deeper threat intelligence, and greater scalability, making it suited for larger enterprises despite a higher cost.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Untangle NG Firewall Report
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall entails higher upfront expenses. Azure Firewall's higher cost caters to a robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall entails higher upfront expenses. Azure Firewall's higher cost caters to a robust feature set.
Azure Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiOS
4.2 out of 5
FortiOS offers robust security features and comprehensive threat intelligence, while Azure Firewall provides seamless integration with Azure services. In comparison, FortiOS excels in advanced threat protection and granular controls, while Azure Firewall is valued for high availability and simplicity in cloud-native environments.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiOS Report
Fortinet FortiOS has a higher setup cost with detailed installation options available, whereas Azure Firewall offers a lower setup cost with less complex initial configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiOS has a higher setup cost with detailed installation options available, whereas Azure Firewall offers a lower setup cost with less complex initial configurations.
Azure Firewall Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
KerioControl
4.1 out of 5
KerioControl excels in cost-effectiveness and customer service, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Azure Firewall offers deep integration with Azure services and advanced threat protection, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive features despite higher costs.Shopify
Download Azure Firewall vs. KerioControl Report
KerioControl has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Azure Firewall, on the other hand, tends to be more expensive to set up, reflecting its more advanced features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
KerioControl has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Azure Firewall, on the other hand, tends to be more expensive to set up, reflecting its more advanced features and scalability.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers advanced security features such as deep packet inspection and threat prevention, ideal for comprehensive protection. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels with seamless integration within Azure services and easy scalability, making it a preferred choice for Azure-centric environments.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Report
The setup cost for Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is considered high, while Azure Firewall's setup cost is more moderate.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is considered high, while Azure Firewall's setup cost is more moderate.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall draws attention for its advanced threat protection, centralized management, and VPN capabilities. In comparison, Azure Firewall stands out for seamless Azure integration and scalability. While Barracuda offers competitive pricing and excellent deployment, Azure provides robust network security features justifying its higher cost.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Report
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall setup cost is considered economical, whereas Azure Firewall has higher initial costs associated with its setup. Barracuda is praised for its affordability, but Azure's robust features justify its expensive setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall setup cost is considered economical, whereas Azure Firewall has higher initial costs associated with its setup. Barracuda is praised for its affordability, but Azure's robust features justify its expensive setup.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust granular control and scalability. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels with integration into Azure services and simpler management tools. Forcepoint's deep packet inspection and protection features are valuable, while Azure Firewall's automated rule management and high availability suit cloud-focused environments.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Report
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers an affordable setup cost, while Azure Firewall has a higher initial setup expense, making Forcepoint a more cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers an affordable setup cost, while Azure Firewall has a higher initial setup expense, making Forcepoint a more cost-effective option.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, advanced security management, and scalability. In comparison, Azure Firewall offers extensive features, seamless integration with Azure services, and built-in high availability, making it appealing for those already in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Report
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for most organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for most organizations.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Zscaler Cloud Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall integrates seamlessly with Microsoft services, appealing to Azure-centric environments. In comparison, Zscaler excels in global cloud security and advanced threat protection, making it ideal for comprehensive cloud setups. Azure Firewall offers cost-effective solutions, while Zscaler provides superior ROI through extensive capabilities.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Zscaler Cloud Firewall Report
Azure Firewall setup costs are considered higher compared to Zscaler Cloud Firewall, which is praised for its cost-effectiveness. These distinct cost structures highlight Azure Firewall's premium approach versus Zscaler's budget-friendly focus.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall setup costs are considered higher compared to Zscaler Cloud Firewall, which is praised for its cost-effectiveness. These distinct cost structures highlight Azure Firewall's premium approach versus Zscaler's budget-friendly focus.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW)
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall offers robust cloud integration, scalability, and easier management. In comparison, FortiGate NGFW provides advanced security features, SSL inspection, and more granular controls. Azure Firewall's seamless cloud deployment is notable, while FortiGate NGFW's comprehensive features justify its higher setup complexity and costs.
Download Azure Firewall vs. FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) Report
Azure Firewall has low initial setup costs which attract budget-conscious users, while FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) requires a higher initial investment but offers a more comprehensive setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall has low initial setup costs which attract budget-conscious users, while FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) requires a higher initial investment but offers a more comprehensive setup experience.
Azure Firewall Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
Juniper vSRX
3.9 out of 5
Juniper vSRX offers advanced security and flexibility, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, Azure Firewall provides seamless Azure service integration and scalability. Juniper vSRX needs simpler configurations, while Azure Firewall requires better documentation. Juniper vSRX is cost-efficient, Azure Firewall justifies its price with integration capabilities.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Juniper vSRX Report
Juniper vSRX setup cost is higher due to the advanced features provided, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more economical setup which might appeal to smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Juniper vSRX setup cost is higher due to the advanced features provided, whereas Azure Firewall offers a more economical setup which might appeal to smaller budgets.
Azure Firewall Logo
SonicWall NSv
4.1 out of 5
Azure Firewall Logo
SonicWall NSv
4.1 out of 5
Azure Firewall offers better pricing and support, while SonicWall NSv excels in features and performance. Azure Firewall integrates seamlessly with Azure services. In comparison, SonicWall NSv includes deep packet inspection and comprehensive reporting tools. Azure Firewall needs better performance; SonicWall NSv needs easier management.
Download Azure Firewall vs. SonicWall NSv Report
The setup cost for Azure Firewall is relatively high compared to the more budget-friendly setup cost of SonicWall NSv.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Azure Firewall is relatively high compared to the more budget-friendly setup cost of SonicWall NSv.
Azure Firewall Logo
Azure Firewall Logo
Netskope Cloud Firewall
1 out of 5
Netskope Cloud Firewall secures cloud environments with advanced threat protection and granular policy controls. It enhances security for remote workforces and cloud applications while ensuring compliance. Users appreciate its traffic monitoring, threat detection, and easy deployment but mention integration improvements, better reporting, streamlined deployment, and improved customer support response times.
View comparison

Related categories

Firewalls
Microsoft Security Suite
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions