Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo

Top 10 Azure Web Application Firewall Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5
Post review

Top Azure Web Application Firewall Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Web Application Firewall based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS WAF, and F5 Advanced WAF. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Azure Web Application Firewall surpasses its competitors by offering superior threat protection, seamlessly integrating with Azure services, enabling rapid deployment, and providing real-time analytics that enhance security effectiveness and visibility for web applications across cloud environments.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers comprehensive cloud security with dynamic workload identity and application dependency mapping, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall provides straightforward web application protection within the Azure ecosystem with effective DDoS mitigation and streamlined integration.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is known for a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is known for a higher initial setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5

AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a firewall security system that monitors incoming and outgoing traffic for applications and websites based on your pre-defined web security rules. AWS WAF defends applications and websites from common Web attacks that could otherwise damage application performance and availability and compromise security.

Download AWS WAF vs. Azure Web Application Firewall Report
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
There are different scale options available for WAF.
View comparison
Pricing
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
There are different scale options available for WAF.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.2 out of 5
F5 Advanced WAF stands out for its robust security with features like anti-bot protection and granular controls. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers seamless integration and cost-effectiveness, appealing to businesses seeking straightforward deployment and flexible pricing solutions.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report
F5 Advanced WAF has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, allowing budget-conscious businesses to consider Azure's lower initial investment as a cost-efficient option.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 Advanced WAF has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, allowing budget-conscious businesses to consider Azure's lower initial investment as a cost-efficient option.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiWeb offers robust security with features like virtual patching and AI-powered threat detection, ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive protection. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall integrates smoothly into Azure's ecosystem, providing effective DDoS defense with flexible pricing and custom rule capabilities.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiWeb Report
Fortinet FortiWeb setup is straightforward and cost-effective, while Azure Web Application Firewall involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiWeb setup is straightforward and cost-effective, while Azure Web Application Firewall involves higher initial expenses.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
NetScaler
4.2 out of 5
NetScaler impresses with flexible deployment, comprehensive features, and high availability, appealing to enterprises with extensive needs. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers effective protection, ease of integration, and cost-effective pricing, attracting organizations prioritizing seamless deployment within Azure's cloud ecosystem.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report
NetScaler has a higher setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall offers a more budget-friendly initial pricing. The cost difference highlights distinct budget considerations for potential adopters.
View comparison
Pricing
NetScaler has a higher setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall offers a more budget-friendly initial pricing. The cost difference highlights distinct budget considerations for potential adopters.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva Web Application Firewall
4.3 out of 5
Imperva offers deep customizability and application profiling, appealing to users needing detailed security configurations. In comparison, Azure is favored for its seamless integration within the Azure ecosystem and offers a predictable pricing model, benefiting those prioritizing cost control in cloud environments.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall Report
Imperva Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall often incurs higher setup expenses, potentially impacting budgeting considerations for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall often incurs higher setup expenses, potentially impacting budgeting considerations for organizations.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall excels in straightforward deployment and competitive pricing for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers superior features and integration with Microsoft services, appealing to enterprises needing robust security and advanced analytics within the Azure ecosystem.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Report
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, highlighting a key difference between the two services in terms of initial financial outlay.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, highlighting a key difference between the two services in terms of initial financial outlay.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Imperva DDoS
4.3 out of 5
Imperva DDoS attracts tech buyers with robust DDoS protection and advanced threat intelligence to secure web applications. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers ease of configuration and seamless Azure integration, appealing to users seeking efficient traffic filtering and value for the price.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva DDoS Report
Imperva DDoS has a substantial setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall offers a more economical setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva DDoS has a substantial setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall offers a more economical setup expense.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Akamai App and API Protector
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall excels in seamless integration with Azure services, offering scalability and customizable security rules, appealing to tech buyers seeking an affordable solution. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector provides AI-powered security and robust threat intelligence, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive feature sets.
Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Azure Web Application Firewall Report
Azure Web Application Firewall features a straightforward, low-cost initial setup, while Akamai App and API Protector involves a more complex, higher-cost setup. Each solution offers distinct pricing advantages based on its setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Web Application Firewall features a straightforward, low-cost initial setup, while Akamai App and API Protector involves a more complex, higher-cost setup. Each solution offers distinct pricing advantages based on its setup requirements.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Radware Alteon
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Radware Alteon
4.2 out of 5
Radware Alteon offers extensive application delivery features and flexible deployment options, making it suitable for diverse environments seeking reliable load-balancing. In comparison, Azure WAF integrates seamlessly with Azure’s ecosystem, providing ease of use and robust security for users invested in cloud services.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall might involve a more complex initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Azure Web Application Firewall might involve a more complex initial investment.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
NGINX App Protect
4.2 out of 5
NGINX App Protect offers flexibility and control for environments needing customization and security, ideal for complex settings. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall simplifies management within the Azure ecosystem, providing seamless integration and configuration for Azure-native workloads.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. NGINX App Protect Report
NGINX App Protect incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, which may involve higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
NGINX App Protect incurs lower initial setup costs compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, which may involve higher expenses.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Fastly
4.3 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Fastly
4.3 out of 5
Fastly excels in agile CDNs and cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-focused firms seeking swift deployment and support. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers extensive integration with Azure services, appealing to businesses requiring scalable security and robust long-term feature investments.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Fastly Report
Fastly has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fastly has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Web Application Firewall, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial implementation.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
F5 Silverline Managed Services
3.8 out of 5
F5 Silverline excels in tailored DDoS protection and flexible management, appealing to those valuing personalized support. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall's integration within Azure and robust analytics make it attractive to users prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term cost-efficiency.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. F5 Silverline Managed Services Report
F5 Silverline Managed Services has higher setup costs than Azure Web Application Firewall, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 Silverline Managed Services has higher setup costs than Azure Web Application Firewall, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service
4.3 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall offers cost advantages and seamless Azure integration, appealing to budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Radware Cloud WAF Service provides specialized security features and deployment flexibility, making it suitable for organizations needing robust protection and cross-platform integration capabilities.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Azure Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs higher initial setup fees. Azure is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Radware.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Web Application Firewall offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while Radware Cloud WAF Service incurs higher initial setup fees. Azure is more budget-friendly for initial deployment compared to Radware.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences)
3.8 out of 5
Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels in adaptability and real-time threat detection, making it suitable for environments needing flexible deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall provides comprehensive features and integration, appealing to enterprises utilizing Microsoft's cloud ecosystem despite higher initial costs.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) Report
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall presents a more complex and potentially higher initial setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
The Fastly Next-Gen WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Web Application Firewall presents a more complex and potentially higher initial setup expense.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Reblaze - part of Link11
4.4 out of 5
Reblaze excels with agile customization, robust support, and versatile deployment for hybrid platforms, providing flexible pricing. In comparison, Azure WAF offers seamless Microsoft integration, straightforward deployment, and robust DDoS protection, appealing to those seeking flexible cost control within enterprise agreements.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Reblaze - part of Link11 Report
Reblaze - part of Link11 offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with the comparatively higher setup cost of Azure Web Application Firewall. Reblaze's cost efficiency is a distinct advantage for budget-conscious users compared to Azure's more premium pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Reblaze - part of Link11 offers a straightforward setup cost, contrasting with the comparatively higher setup cost of Azure Web Application Firewall. Reblaze's cost efficiency is a distinct advantage for budget-conscious users compared to Azure's more premium pricing model.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service
3.6 out of 5
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service attracts with its competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers extensive integration with Azure's ecosystem. Barracuda appeals to budget-conscious users, while Azure is ideal for those deeply embedded in other Azure services.
Download Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service Report
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has minimal setup costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost difference in setup between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has minimal setup costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost difference in setup between the two solutions.
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Indusface AppTrana
4.5 out of 5
Azure Web Application Firewall Logo
Indusface AppTrana
4.5 out of 5

AppTrana is designed to address the shortcomings in existing cloud security solutions which claim to provide comprehensive protection using only technology based cookie cutter solutions. Welcome to the new world of AppTrana where your entire application security is custom built by experts based on your existing risk posture.

Indusface AppTrana is an affordable and cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Indusface AppTrana is an affordable and cost-effective solution.

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Microsoft Security Suite
Container Security