

F5 Silverline Managed Services and Azure Web Application Firewall compete in the web application security market. Based on data comparisons, Azure Web Application Firewall may have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set.
Features: F5 Silverline Managed Services provides robust DDoS protection, extensive reporting, and customizable security measures. Azure Web Application Firewall offers integrated threat intelligence, flexibility in traffic management, and compatibility with Azure services.
Room for Improvement: F5 Silverline could enhance its integration capabilities and flexibility in traffic management. It might also improve user interface intuitiveness and provide more seamless self-service setup options. Azure Web Application Firewall could benefit from reducing its upfront costs, enhancing support for external non-Azure environments, and simplifying configurations for non-experienced users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 Silverline Managed Services is known for its fully managed service model, which simplifies deployment and ensures continuous support. Azure Web Application Firewall integrates seamlessly with the Azure ecosystem, although its self-service setup can be challenging without experienced personnel. Silverline's customer service is often praised for its responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: F5 Silverline Managed Services tends to present lower initial setup costs and delivers high ROI through its managed service offerings. Azure Web Application Firewall, while potentially more expensive upfront, provides long-term value with extensive integration capabilities and powerful features that enhance ROI over time. The primary pricing distinction is Silverline's affordability and Azure's investment in extensive features.
AI-based recommendations save on time and money.
Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.
I hardly use Microsoft's paid subscription or maintenance services, however, whenever I send them a note, they have been responsive.
I would rate the technical support that Azure provides from Microsoft a seven.
I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.
Their support team is responsive, and they deliver timely updates, addressing any glitches promptly.
They resolve the issues by joining me to fix them.
Beyond a certain SKU, I can install and use these services.
For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.
F5 Silverline Managed Services is scalable enough without observed limitations.
The solution is fully scalable, and I would give it a rating of ten on a scale of one to ten for scalability.
Very rarely do I see any latency issues.
They offer regular updates, and overall, I would rate the stability of the solution as nine out of ten.
Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.
The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.
Introducing preemptive support prompts would reduce the manual effort required for creating policies or blocking specific IPs.
Improvements could include the creation of highly optimized profiles.
It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
On a scale where ten is very expensive, I would rate the pricing as three.
The solution is expensive
With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.
It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.
It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.
The monitoring tab displays GET and POST requests in a readable format, making it accessible even to non-tech-savvy individuals.
It allows for centralized management of certificates, protecting applications from top ten attacks like SQL injection and cross-site scripting.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Web Application Firewall | 3.1% |
| F5 Silverline Managed Services | 1.3% |
| Other | 95.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
F5's Silverline Managed Services is a SaaS solution delivering DDoS protection, managed Web Application Firewall (WAF) services, and managed Shape Security Fraud and Anti-bot solutions.
Silverline services include 24x7 access to F5's Security Operations Center (SOC). F5's expert security professionals use F5 products with state-of-the-art security tools to ensure the best protection possible. As an add-on to Silverline DDoS or WAF services, Silverline Threat Intelligence integrates dynamic lists of threatening IP addresses to give context for policy decisions.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.