BigFix Reviews

BigFix is primarily used for patch management, compliance, and security patches.

It covers multiple operating systems and helps patch customers with patch management services, alleviating patch management issues for our customers.

It covers multiple operating systems and helps with patch management. BigFix is also valuable for its inventory, license inventory, and compliance with server hardening.

BigFix could improve its asset management capabilities to discover assets, including hardware. More improvements could be made in asset management.

We have been reselling BigFix for three years.

The overall stability of the solution is good with no reported issues.

The solution is very easy to scale.

Customer support from HCL is satisfactory and not usually an issue.

Neutral

The installation is quite smooth and can be managed by one person, depending on the complexity and size of the environment.

Our project team managed the installation quite smoothly.

There has been a significant return on investment, particularly saving time and resources in patch management and compliance. It saves approximately 40% to 50% of time and resources.

The pricing is competitive, but not the most competitive.

We used BigFix internally at my previous org. My current company is a BigFix reseller. A lot of people are looking at endpoint security now, but we primarily used BigFix for true endpoint management.

Endpoint security has become the main thing, but we used BigFix for patching and a lot of the other use cases in the past, and I think it worked pretty well. Obviously, the market has gotten much more crowded. 

The UEM component evolved into reunified endpoint management. Many of our customers used it for deployment and patching. HCL has a new endpoint security approach now, but it was really for managing that. 

BigFix can manage lost devices, so you can wipe them remotely to ensure the IP doesn't get out in public. Unified endpoint security is a new perspective. I know that HCL is also collaborating with IBM, but I'm not sure if there is any cooperation between them and MaaS360 or other endpoint components.

The main shortcoming of BigFix was integration with vulnerability management. If you had a vulnerability in your software and BigFix on the endpoint, you needed integration with Qualys, Tenable, or another vulnerability management solution to fix that. It was like, "Okay, we can identify issues, and get that information back from the endpoint, but what are we doing about it?" 

The stability has been solid when I've used BigFix with customers in the past. In that space, I don't think everybody is doing as much innovation as in other areas in the endpoint management or security market. 

I delineate between those two because endpoint management is a different use case. I think it's probably become a lot more important since the pandemic started.

We never had any challenges with scalability. Some of our customers had tens of thousands of endpoints. 

I used a few competitors a while back, but I don't know what LANDESK is up to these days. They were a big player in the market, but I don't know what other contenders are out there now.

The patching tool is $250 per client device per year. The inventory and discovery tool is $15 per client per year. They have a lifecycle management tool that is the central component for managing endpoints, which costs around $43 per year. BigFix Compliance is the other part, and that's also around $43.

I rate BigFix nine out of 10. I wouldn't recommend it to everyone. It depends on your infrastructure. If you have a pure Microsoft shop, you can probably get by deploying and managing endpoints their way. 

However, if you have a mixed environment of any kind, BigFix is good at what it does. Patch management is vital for security posture, so I wouldn't be surprised if BigFix is becoming increasingly popular.

We're using it for Windows patching and inventory. We are totally dependent on BigFix for these tasks.

Almost every feature is wonderful in BigFix. It is very stable, and we can rely on it. It is an awesome tool.

It can be improved speed-wise. They can make it a little bit light. If you do any query for servers in bulk, it can take some time. Similarly, creating a job can take some time. 

Automation is everything, and we're looking for more automation. If we have different jobs to secure the environment, such as with server hardening, and I want a particular service that is not running, BigFix should automatically check it and do the deployment. It can send a message about why a particular job is not working on the servers or not communicating properly with Active Directory. We should be able to check the reason. We just want just a little bit of monitoring in that area.

I have been using this solution for more than three years.

It is very stable. You can trust and rely on an automated job. It will definitely work. You get a proper message if it is not working for any particular reason. It gives you a complete picture.

It is definitely scalable. We are managing around 20,000 servers with it, and we have more than 100 users. We are providing web report access to application users as well. We create a job and provide access to different teams, such as the monitoring team, backup team, and security team to deploy the job. So, it is definitely scalable.

I have personally worked with them because I request them to create access for all my colleagues. If required, I log a case in BigFix. Earlier the support was very good for BigFix, but now, HCL is facing some challenges. We are getting support, but we need more in that area. Their support was much better as compared to this time.

I have not worked with a similar solution previously. We purchased Tanium
two to three years ago. It is being used by a different team, but we are still using BigFix. We want to replace BigFix, but we are not able to because we are more comfortable with it. So, we are continuing with BigFix.

It is very easy. It is simple to understand. Even though I had requested training for BigFix, I would have been able to work with it without training.

Its price is very reasonable.

I have been recommending BigFix to my friends and different companies. We are very happy with BigFix. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. It is an excellent product, but there is always room for improvement.

I'm a full stack developer and we are customers of BigFix. 

All the vendor patches are synchronized automatically, which is something you don't find in other tools. It enables an unlimited number of management fixes to be created automatically. For software deployments and software package staging, we can easily use a web script and deploy directly which is another great feature.

Improvements can be made when it comes to in-place and OS upgrades. For example, SCCM provides a feature upgrade that's automatically synchronized, whereas in BigFix it doesn't synchronize for feature updates for Windows 10.
I'd also like to see some more advanced reporting tools. 

I've been using this solution for about four years. 

The solution is generally stable although sometimes our customers will report some issues and it's not always easy to find the source. 

The scalability is fine. 

We don't really use customer support. We have enough knowledge for reporting and deployments, and we have a TRC that allows us to access the remote of the end-users and check any problems. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

If you compare BigFix with SCCM, both have their own specialty tools. In some cases, I prefer BigFix and in others I prefer SCCM. If you're talking about patching, I'd go with BigFix but if it's connected to image management, then I'd go with SCCM.

I rate this solution seven out of 10. 

The most valuable features of the solution are Windows patching and the hardware and software inventory. The solution's reporting is very good in a single console.

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

We have been doing a POC for the last three months with BigFix's Evolution version.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Around 500 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten for scalability.

Intune only supports Windows and does not support other platforms like Unix and Linux. On the other hand, BigFix supports all platforms.

The solution's initial setup is simple and not complex. I have done the full server installation and configuration thrice, and it's not complex.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing one out of ten.

Patch management is configured in existing endpoint computers. We are pushing the custom policy deployment in weekly patches, which require critical and important patches. Since it's a by-policy, it's pushed automatically. We have enabled the solution's remote endpoint management option, but we are primarily focussing on licensing hardware and software inventory.

BigFix's integration with our IT infrastructure was easy. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for patching.

The solution offers great patching, even for third-party patching. Many organizations know how to patch Microsoft products. However, the biggest benefit for BigFix is third-party patching. It can patch Notepad and Java - all of these third-party products that are non-Mircosoft.

It's stable. 

The implementation process is simple. 

It can scale. 

I'm not sure if there are any extra features needed.

It could use better integration with Hypervisor products like VMware. This is where it is lacking right now. There are articles available explaining how to integrate with VMware. However, it's my understanding that it is somewhat difficult. 

I am not sure if this is available on the cloud or not. 

I've been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is stable. I'd rate it eight out of ten. We've had no issues with stability. Performance-wise, it has been fine. 

One of the issues that my guys come across is it can take up to 48 hours before the Microsoft patches are available in BigFix since we are a day ahead in New Zealand. 

I'm not sure how many people are using the solution in our organization. 

The scalability is okay. I'd rate the solution seven or eight out of ten in terms of the ease of scaling. My experience with scaling has been pretty good. 

There is a lot of web access and online groups available, which are quite good. I don't necessarily have access to support and, therefore, cannot speak to their level of support.

We do have an internal team that would be able to get hold of support.

I'm also familiar with ECCM. However, it only patches Microsoft products. We've also used BatchPatch, used for pushing scripts, among other solutions.

I helped with the installation process for two customers. The installation was reasonably swift; however, the actual consideration and moving the patching products across into BigFix that can take a long time. The configuration took six to 12 months. 

A massive gain for BigFix would be if it was able to go and interrogate products like SCCM and import the patching sequences and groups, it would make it much easier. 

I'd rate the initial setup process seven out of ten. It does take quite a long time to bring everything across from other products. 

I'm not sure of the exact licensing structure. It might be about $23 a client. Some of the modules, such as security compliance and lifecycle, may cost extra. For example, the integration with BigFix and Micorosft Defender may require an extra license. 

I'm an avid BigFix fan, and we use it in my company quite a bit.

We're the biggest vendor in New Zealand, and we have it installed in our organization and fed out to clients. 

This is our patching product of choice. All new customers get BigFix implemented, and existing customers are encouraged to have it as well. 

We're an integrator. 

We're completing a new client install and working on the configuration of patching, and this is the best tool we've ever implemented for this customer. I love this tool. It could just be a bit more accessible.

I'd recommend the solution. I'd rate it nine out of ten.

The solution is being used for automation. We deploy the package as customized software, and we provide ad-hoc requests via BigFix.

The solution is deployed on the cloud, but it can also be installed on-premises.

The most valuable features are patch management, software installation, and asset management.

I would like the dashboard to be improved to show the problematic machines and good machines.

I have used BigFix for five years.

It's very stable.

We can scale up or down according to our needs.

Technical support is responsible and knowledgeable. They're supportive when we have any issue in the environment and require help from them.

We can troubleshoot the tool. If there are any major issues, we go to the support team for help.

I would rate technical support as five out of five.

The setup is easy. I would rate it as five out of five.

It requires maintenance every month. Only two or three people are needed for maintenance.

We used a third-party consultant.

BigFix is very easy to use. I have also used SCCM, but there were issues with the machine not restarting. There were many problems produced in the environment and in the agent. In BigFix, I haven't seen any issues with the agent. It works smoothly.

I would rate this solution as 10 out of 10.

We are using BigFix for desktop management, endpoint management, inventory, application control, remote control, building machines, master images, OS deployment, and software distribution.

The most valuable and essential features of BigFix are all of them, they are needed when serving the purpose of the desktop operation framework. We cannot run operations without patching or without having an appropriate mechanism for deploying software, et cetera. The features all serve their purpose for our use case.

The one feature that provided the most value and efficiency would be patch management. It's the most powerful feature in BigFix.

BigFix can improve the way machines report back to the console. In the external relay management environment, it has become more of a hybrid environment with most of the machines not being on-site. The need of having public-facing reporting items interconnected is becoming more and more crucial. In general, the reporting could use some enhancement.

In a future release, it would be a benefit to have a cloud-based solution with external cloud-based relays. Additionally, having a remote control in the cloud feature would be interesting.

I have been using BigFix for approximately four years.

BigFix is stable. However, there have been a few minor issues, such as the relay's not reporting.

The scalability of BigFix is good. How deployment is not that large in size. The exercises that we do are pretty limited.

We have approximately 30 administrators using this solution.

Our company has a good relationship with the reseller that we work with and the support they provide to us is fair.

The initial setup of BigFix was easy because we started from scratch, we didn't have a CCM before. The deployment of BigFix is a powerful feature, it is simple to do.

The price of BigFix could be lower. However, I am always seeking a lower price.

My advice to others is for them to take a holistic approach while designing. Don't look at one functionality, but look at the environment as a framework. View it from all aspects and merge operation with security. Don't let your focus be on the compliance of your environment or on the operation element alone, take other aspects into consideration, such as the security aspect, which is fast remediation, vulnerability management, and end-of-life management.

I rate BigFix an eight out of ten.