When I was working at BT Telecom, we used Cisco SD-WAN for IP telephony.
In my current position in this company, we use this solution to classify network traffic and send the IP packets to the appropriate link.
When I was working at BT Telecom, we used Cisco SD-WAN for IP telephony.
In my current position in this company, we use this solution to classify network traffic and send the IP packets to the appropriate link.
I have found the solution's main features are its ability to be customized, network traffic classification, and has a wide range of features that can be set.
I have been using this solution for approximately two years.
The solution is stable.
I have found the solution scalable. We have approximately 10 clients.
I was satisfied with the technical support.
The installation is not easy. If you have experience and it is not your first time doing the installation, it can be easier. Additionally, there are a lot of different parameters to set and you have to know exactly what the parameters do. From this perspective, it is not easy. There are a lot of possibilities to do fine-tuning with the SD-WAN settings.
If you were to set all the parameters all at once it would take a lot of time. It is best to fine-tune them over time. This is not a negative factor, having more options allows flexibility.
I would recommend a system integration company that has the knowledge of how to operate the system to do the implementation.
The price of the solution is the only negative factor, it is much more expensive compared with the Cisco Meraki SD-WAN solution.
I have evaluated Cisco Meraki SD-WAN.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Cisco SD-WAN a ten out of ten.
We are resellers and integrators.
It's a complete solution with many security features.
It integrates well with other Cisco solutions.
Customers require features that are secure for endpoints, on-premises, and for the cloud.
We could provision Cisco Umbrella to respond to the security requirements.
They need to make provisions in the platform cloud with tools. In the cloud environment, it is very easy to enable the solution with Umbrella.
They should configure to provision other devices and many endpoints to deploy the SD-WAN with security.
I would like a feature included for the prevention and inspection of data to implement.
I have been working with Cisco SD-WAN for three years.
We are using the Viptela version.
We had issues with the stability only one time when we integrated Viptella SD-WAN with Cisco Umbrella. After reading all of the documentation, we have not had any issues with the stability.
Cisco SD-WAN is scalable.
Cisco technical support is very good. They are responsive to my questions and send me all of the information needed.
They respond quickly.
We are also using Meraki.
Meraki is more suited to small companies, whereas Cisco is more for larger enterprise companies.
We have a hybrid deployment. We have clients who prefer the cloud and others who want an on-premises deployment.
The initial setup was straightforward. It was easy.
The time for deployment depends on the size of the company and its requirements. There are many factors. It can take two months to six months to complete.
We have a team of five people. One project manager, two specialist engineers, and two basic engineers, who maintain this solution.
Cisco is more expensive than FortiGate.
We also evaluated Fortinet FortiGate for our clients. For customers, it is mainly a decision based on pricing and technical options.
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it. Technical support is very strong and provides high-level assistance. They have knowledgeable technicians with engineers present.
Overall, it's a very good solution.
I would rate Cisco SD-WAN a nine out of ten.
We use this solution for our web gateway, VPN, and access control.
It is good enough to provide normal web access but it doesn't offer any add-ons. We plan to move away from this solution and use the cloud-based firewall that is managed by our provider.
The most valuable feature is the network routing.
The reliability is high and we have only had to restart it once or twice over the years.
I would like to see a better, web-based interface to make changes to the configuration or to view statistics. The main weakness of Cisco products is the user interface.
This solution would be improved with the inclusion of an ISA Firewall.
I have been using this solution for five or six years.
This is a stable solution. it does what it is supposed to do and is working fine.
I would say that the scalability is pretty limited, although we don't have any issue with it because we only use the basic features. For example, we don't use dynamic routing. We have 50 users.
The Cisco technical support is pretty good. They are easy to contact if you need support and they are pretty fast.
The initial setup is pretty bit straightforward, although it is a little bit hard because it is done through the command line. The web GUI is an old style and not really flexible.
It took us approximately one day to switch from our old solution. We don't use any of the advanced features so it was a simple migration for us.
Our in-house team implemented this solution.
One person is suitable for deployment and maintenance.
We pay for the Cisco Customer Care support, which is a couple of hundred dollars. There are no fees in addition to this.
This solution is only good for basic routing. I cannot map stuff to a network name because it is not linked to anything else. It is a standalone unit.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to familiarize themselves with the command line.
To summarize, the reliability is very high but managing it is a little bit inconvenient.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Cisco SD-WAN is a very good product. It is difficult to highlight one specific feature.
We don't have any issues with this solution other than the price.
I have been working with Cisco SD-WAN for a couple of years.
We have recently upgraded to the newest version.
Cisco SD-WAN is a stable product.
Cisco SD-WAN is a scalable solution.
We have many users in our organization.
The technical support is excellent.
I have worked with VMware products, but not with SD-WAN.
The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to install.
The price is high.
It's a good product, it's stable, and has good support.
I would rate Cisco SD-WAN an eight out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for data centers with several providers. We also use the solution for branch offices. We have used it on 20 branch offices in one instance and the other instance has about 90 remote sites.
The security features are very good. We really like the application routing, for example.
The initial setup is quite simple.
The solution offers very good documentation.
Technical support is quite helpful.
The product is very scalable.
There are a lot of exciting features coming out very soon which we are looking forward to working with.
The security features could be improved.
The solution needs to offer better stability.
The product could have improved flexibility.
I've been using the solution for about thirteen months. It's been just over a year at this point, so it hasn't been too long.
The solution could have better stability. It's not ideal right now. It could be quite a bit better.
The solution can scale. If a company needs to expand it, it should be able to do so rather easily.
We typically work with small and medium-sized organizations. I'm not sure if the companies we work with intend to expand their usage in the future or not.
Technical support for the product is quite good. We're satisfied with the level of support we receive from them.
The documents, manuals, and community support on offer are very good.
The initial setup is not complex. We found it to be straightforward and easy.
The deployment took about six months for one project and a few months for another.
You need about four people for deployment and maintenance tasks.
We tend to implement this solution for our clients if they require it of us.
We didn't look at other options before choosing this solution.
We're partners for Cisco. We're resellers and implementers.
For the routers, we are using versions 73.2 and 16.12.3. We use both cloud and on-premises deployment models.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would rate this product at an eight. We've mostly been quite happy with it.
There are a few use cases. We work, for example, with a telecom that provides end solutions to end users across different countries.
The product's brand recognition is one of the most valuable aspects of the solution.
We've just started using the solution, so I don't know if there are any features that are missing. We haven't used it long enough to find any faults.
The initial setup could be a bit less complex.
We only started using the solution a year ago.
The solution is stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. The solution is reliable. It just works.
The solution is scalable.
We have the technical knowledge on our side. We get very little support from Cisco, so we rely mostly on our own team.
We use both Cisco and Juniper.
The solution is complex. It's not straightforward. There's a lot of ways to configure it and they're not straightforward. There are two types of the solution as well, so a person would need to know how to deploy either one.
For us, the solution took two to three days to deploy.
I don't know much about the pricing because, at present, we used some simulators to test the software for clients. The pricing does not always match up with what our lab predictions are. We give information to the customers, and we give them some knowledge about the products and we explain the differences between the different vendors, like Juniper, and other vendors small vendors like Altera Technology. Ultimately, the client decides which vendor they will go with.
I'd recommend the solution. Instead of going to another vendor, it's best to go with Cisco, because Cisco has a level of longevity in the global market.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Cisco SD-WAN is highly secure.
We had some issues with Cisco SD-WAN but somehow we troubleshot it and things are going well. The issues have not been a large problem.
I have been using Cisco SD-WAN for approximately 18 months.
When we have had power outages for a few hours we have had no issue with Cisco SD-WAN coming back online and functioning.
The technical support is good from Cisco. When we have a problem we notify Cisco and within a day or two, they will have solved the situation. They are very cooperative.
The security of the solution is pretty good.
We like the user interface. It's fairly easy to navigate.
The user experience is pretty good.
We've found that the solution is easy to deploy.
The solution is very popular with many vendors.
Overall, our experience has been very positive. So far, so good. We don't have many complaints about its capabilities.
We've worked with BetterCloud, and found the security to be better than what is offered by Cisco. The user interface is nicer as well. Cisco should look at what they are doing and try to replicate it a bit.
When it comes to adding more security features, you need to add more RAM.
The pricing could be a bit better. When a customer transfers from a traditional WAN to SD-WAN, the subscription price is one big problem for them.
The solution is a bit buggy, which makes it slightly unstable.
The provisioning could be easier during deployment. Some vendors say they can handle provisioning, however, it differs from vendor to vendor.
I've been working with the solution for more than one year at this point. It is likely closer to two years now.
We do find that the solution can be a bit buggy. The more complex the setup is, the more bugs we seem to find. There seem to be many bugs in the software.
The web GUI is easy to deploy, however, when we deploy a whole network for a customer, we can see how they run inside the GUI. We've had to open cases with technical support to help us deal with issues that arise.
We have medium-sized clients, largely based in the retail industry.
We've dealt with technical support in the past to help us deal with a few bugs. They are pretty professional.
I'm working for a partner in Vietnam. They have many vendors, including Aruba and Meraki Cisco.
The initial setup isn't too complex. It's pretty straightforward. A company shouldn't have too many issues with the setup.
I've done it a few times at this point, and every time, day by day, it gets easier and easier.
The solution is a bit expensive. There's a big jump from WAN to SD-WAN which customers don't like.
We are a Cisco partner.
I've worked with a variety of different versions of the solution. I'm not always using the latest version.
Cisco is a very professional organization. They offer good support.
I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten.