I primarily use this solution for remote connectivity.
Head IT Operations at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Good support, provides for remote connectivity that is scalable and easy to manage
Pros and Cons
- "This solution can scale from SMB to the enterprise level. It is very impressive."
- "This solution is expensive so pricing is a concern."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
In a software-defined network architecture, it heals itself and the management of the solution is very easy.
What needs improvement?
This solution is expensive so pricing is a concern.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco SD-WAN for about one year.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had no issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This solution can scale from SMB to the enterprise level. It is very impressive.
Scalability in this context does not concern users, but connections between the head office and branch offices. We do not deal with endpoints or end-users.
We do not have plans for expansion or increasing our usage at this point.
How are customer service and support?
I have contacted technical support several times during the deployment phase and while troubleshooting. They are amazing. They are really helpful and the support is perfect.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have only ever used Cisco solutions.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward.
For a regular customer, the deployment will probably take between 15 and 20 days.
What about the implementation team?
We deploy these types of products for our clients.
What other advice do I have?
This is a good solution. It's a new technology that people should look into because it provides for seamless management of the whole network, including switches. That said, there is always room for improvement.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Junior Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Useful Zero-Touch provisioning, good performance, and scalable
Pros and Cons
- "I have found the performance and the Zero-Touch provisioning helpful which makes it easier for us to develop."
- "The solution could be more secure. Security is always a priority for us."
What is our primary use case?
I have a partner in a manufacturing company that wants to reduce the use of the MPLS when using the internet. I proposed they use Meraki for the SD-WAN hub and since they only wanted to use a few WAN links I suggested the Cisco SD-WAN for their domain, main protection, and the internet for the backup of all the transitions that do not need critical time.
What is most valuable?
I have found the performance and the Zero-Touch provisioning helpful which makes it easier for us to develop.
What needs improvement?
The solution could be more secure. Security is always a priority for us.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for approximately one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have found this solution stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
One of my client's organizations has approximately 5,000 users using the solution.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is easy to implement and maintain.
If we already agreed on the design and conditions with the customer the installation can take approximately two hours to implement the hub. For the SD-WAN it can take less than one hour and if we use the VPP it is even quicker.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is no license required for this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Cisco SD-WAN an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the biggest difference between Cisco SD-WAN and VeloCloud?
- I'm looking for a comparison report to choose an SD-WAN solution for a university: Cisco Viptela vs VMware VeloCloud vs Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect
- What is the biggest difference between Cisco SD-WAN and Citrix SD-WAN?
- Would you choose Cisco SD-WAN or Fortinet FortiGate?
- Which solution has the best SD-WAN features in terms of deployment, robustness, and management: Cisco SD-WAN or Fortinet Secure SD-WAN?
- Which Network Management System is better, IBM Netcool or HP Node Manager?
- When evaluating Network Management Applications, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Which Network Analyzer and Network Configuration Manager do you recommend?
- Which device do you recommend to use for traffic shaping & bandwidth optimization between P2P links?
- Installing the new IBM Tivoli "NOI" Application