Top 10 Cisco Secure Access Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco

4.5 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Cisco Secure Access Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Secure Access based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Netskope, and Cato SASE Cloud Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Secure Access surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat detection, advanced zero-trust security architecture, and seamless integration, ensuring reliable protection and easy management for businesses seeking robust cybersecurity solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.1 out of 5

Prisma Access offers advanced threat prevention, integrating security solutions and customizable policies, ideal for threat-focused needs. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access provides seamless infrastructure integration and superior scalability, appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive capabilities and strong ROI for large-scale implementations.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks often incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks often incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope

4.2 out of 5

Netskope offers competitive pricing and robust customer support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access provides seamless integration and extensive security features, making it ideal for large organizations seeking comprehensive protection despite higher costs.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. Netskope Report

Pricing

Netskope has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, making it a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, making it a more budget-friendly option.

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud Platform

4.4 out of 5

Cato SASE Cloud excels with competitive pricing and easy deployment, ideal for those valuing cost-effectiveness and support. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access offers advanced features and scalability, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive security and flexibility despite a steeper learning curve.

Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Cisco Secure Access Report

Pricing

Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a straightforward setup process and affordable initial costs, while Cisco Secure Access provides a more complex installation with potentially higher upfront expenses, highlighting a significant difference in budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

FortiSASE

3.9 out of 5

FortiSASE

3.9 out of 5

FortiSASE impresses with integration efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access offers comprehensive protection and scalability. FortiSASE is ideal for cost-conscious buyers, while Cisco Secure Access suits those requiring a broad feature set despite higher initial costs.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. FortiSASE Report

Pricing

FortiSASE has a high setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more competitive and lower initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

FortiSASE has a high setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more competitive and lower initial investment.

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)