Network Engineer at a university with 51-200 employees
Cisco IronPort is a powerful device that adds more to traditional Cisco NAC appliances the capability to defend against application and operating system attacks
What is most valuable?
Our company was facing a problem of user complaints with network performance despite the fact that we used Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS. When we scanned the mail server with antivirus we found a lot of threats that couldn't be treated, so we need to use IronPort. Cisco IronPort mail security was very helpful by blocking threats, viruses, worms and Trojans from attacking the mail accounts and user PCs.
What needs improvement?
-Added cost and delay to the network traffic, but performance did remain stable.
-Requires knowledge and operation time to manage an added security device to the network devices besides IPS and ASA.
What other advice do I have?
Cisco IronPort is Cisco's new network access controller (NAC). Cisco IronPort email and web security products are used online with the firewall Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS to filter attacks, threats, phishing and data loss.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Simple to add to our network and efficient to troubleshoot
Valuable Features:
• Cost-effective since they do not require extra hardware
• They are simple to plug into the available network
• Protection of mail channel works well regardless of the email client used
• Efficient to troubleshoot
Room for Improvement:
• Requires several actions to employ rules
• It takes time to harmonize information from the email log events with higher level reporting tools
Other Advice:
Security risks presented by web-based malware, spyware and web traffic exposes organizations to compliance and productivity dangers introduced by improper usage of the web within the organization. IronPort allows visibility into the problem and an easy way to pinpoint policy offenders. It includes a user friendly interface and easy content incorporation, filtering and reporting infrastructure.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Email Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Darktrace
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Proofpoint Email Protection
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform
Fortinet FortiMail
Mimecast Email Security
Barracuda Email Security Gateway
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Abnormal Security
Trend Micro Email Security
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Sophos Email
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Email Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
- What are the threats associated with using ‘bogus’ cybersecurity tools?
- Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
- When evaluating Messaging Security, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best email encryption software for small enterprises using Office 365?
- What security measures should businesses prioritize to support secure remote work?
- When evaluating Email Security tools, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
- Which is the best email security gateway?
- Why are Email Security tools important for companies?
- Why is Email Security important for companies?
I would not suggest Cisco Ironport to anyone, just installed a 40mb circuit and it's not going well pings to 108.171.131.161 are just sad. We are reviewing the configuration but overall it is just a waste of our time and money. I'm not impressed at all...