Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Consultant
Enabled us to set rules to block spam, and the user interface was easy to use
Pros and Cons
  • "The user interface was quite friendly, it was quite easy to use, unlike some other Cisco products. Anybody could use it. You don't have to be familiar with IT to be able to handle navigating it."
  • "We didn't get any malware, but a few phishing emails, maybe one or two, slipped in."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case was email security, to protect against phishing mails, spam, malware, and viruses. 

How has it helped my organization?

We used to get emails with viruses that would impact the business or we would get emails with malware. We were able to scan the email and clear it or block emails with viruses. That was the business justification. On a weekly basis, it was blocking about 2,000 or 2,500 emails.

It protects you, it protects your network, it protects you from phishing emails and malicious content and the like.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature was the anti-spam feature. You could set rules to block emails based on specific words like "pornography," "sex," "guns," "violence." That was one thing I liked about it. With the anti-spam, we didn't get all those emails.

Also, Cisco was scanning our emails with their own intelligence. I liked that.

Finally, the user interface was quite friendly, it was quite easy to use, unlike some other Cisco products. Anybody could use it. You don't have to be familiar with IT to be able to handle navigating it.

What needs improvement?

There were a couple of access issues.

Also, they need to keep their intelligence top-notch. I remember a particular phishing email that came through to my then-CEO. So they could improve on their intelligence.

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Email
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Email. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's quite stable. We didn't have issues because, when I think about the issues, they were from us. The two boxes were in cluster, so when the guys at the other site would start without telling us, we would get cluster error messages. Apart from that, it was fine.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, I'm pretty much sure we could go as high as 1,500 users.

How are customer service and support?

The support is great. It's one of the best, if not the best. If you have a particular issue, Cisco can SSH tunnel into your box and help you fix it. As long as we had a running contract, their response time was five minutes, tops. 

If you don't have a running contract but there is a security issue, say malware, for example, they'll respond. But if it has to do with hardware, they don't respond. They'll tell you to get a contract before they'll respond. It depends on what the issue is.

How was the initial setup?

The deployment was quite easy. We wanted it with high-availability. It wasn't a greenfield, it was just an upgrade. The initial deployment had been done before.

The GUI is self-explanatory: If you want to block emails, you want to erase emails, you do the IP address configuration and what your DNS is. It's pretty simple, a very easy-to-use GUI. If you want to buy licenses, you want to check the status of your licenses, you want to check the status of your box, you want to check the environment, it's very simple.

The upgrade took me about 30 minutes for each box. It was just me involved in the upgrade.

What was our ROI?

The ROI is about business continuity. If you get hit by malware through an email, you'll understand. Email security is a must-have; not necessarily Cisco Secure Email Gateway, but email security. It can come from any vendor, as far as I'm concerned.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing was not per user, the licensing model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly. Aside from the standard licensing fees, you have to pay for support.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

After using Cisco Secure Email Gateway we used Trend Micro. The difference between them is just the vendor. There's really no difference. Same approach. It's the same technology. I would say Trend Micro is more granular. But overall, It's the same technology. I don't think one is better than the other. Who you buy from depends on marketing.

What other advice do I have?

Email security is a must-have, and as much as the cloud providers will tell you they have security, from our own experience, the vendors' security products are a bit superior. The reasons I chose Cisco Secure Email Gateway are the interface is - it's easy to use - and the support is great. Also, it's nice to have another gateway, not just the Cisco Secure Email Cloud Gateway because it has proven not to be enough.

The organization I was working in where Cisco Secure Email Gateway was implemented had about 700 staff members, roughly 700 email boxes. There were no plans to increase usage of Cisco Secure Email Gateway at that organization. The reality now is that if your emails are on O365, O365 offers you some form of Cisco Secure Email Cloud Gateway. For most organizations, they're looking for business justification to keep Cisco Secure Email Gateway when Microsoft, for example, is offering cloud protection for your mailboxes on O365. In a case like that, you really don't expand business on Cisco Secure Email Gateway. Now that mailboxes are no longer on-prem, and the cloud provider is offering you email security, the way they sell is that you cannot say have your email on the cloud without paying for cloud security. There is really not much expansion on Cisco Secure Email Gateway from a business standpoint, if your mailbox is with a cloud provider.

I would give Cisco Secure Email Gateway an eight out of ten. We didn't get any malware, but a few phishing emails, maybe one or two, slipped in. There is really no vendor, in my experience, that I would rate at ten out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user2871 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a university with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Cisco IronPort is a powerful device that adds more to traditional Cisco NAC appliances the capability to defend against application and operating system attacks

Valuable Features:

Our company was facing a problem of user complaints with network performance despite the fact that we used Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS. When we scanned the mail server with antivirus we found a lot of threats that couldn't be treated, so we need to use IronPort. Cisco IronPort mail security was very helpful by blocking threats, viruses, worms and Trojans from attacking the mail accounts and user PCs.

Room for Improvement:

-Added cost and delay to the network traffic, but performance did remain stable. -Requires knowledge and operation time to manage an added security device to the network devices besides IPS and ASA.

Other Advice:

Cisco IronPort is Cisco's new network access controller (NAC). Cisco IronPort email and web security products are used online with the firewall Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS to filter attacks, threats, phishing and data loss.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Email
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Email. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user3882 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
Simple to add to our network and efficient to troubleshoot

Valuable Features:

• Cost-effective since they do not require extra hardware • They are simple to plug into the available network • Protection of mail channel works well regardless of the email client used • Efficient to troubleshoot

Room for Improvement:

• Requires several actions to employ rules • It takes time to harmonize information from the email log events with higher level reporting tools

Other Advice:

Security risks presented by web-based malware, spyware and web traffic exposes organizations to compliance and productivity dangers introduced by improper usage of the web within the organization. IronPort allows visibility into the problem and an easy way to pinpoint policy offenders. It includes a user friendly interface and easy content incorporation, filtering and reporting infrastructure.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user386826 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user386826Distribution Systems Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor

I would not suggest Cisco Ironport to anyone, just installed a 40mb circuit and it's not going well pings to 108.171.131.161 are just sad. We are reviewing the configuration but overall it is just a waste of our time and money. I'm not impressed at all...

See all 2 comments
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Email Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Email Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.