Cisco Secure Email Reviews

The Cisco Email Security Appliance is being used as the primary email gateway for our datacenter. We use the Cisco Email Security Appliance to receive, send, scan, and filter our incoming and outgoing email.

We use the Talos Threat intelligence to filter out known 'bad' email sender. The Sophos Antivirus plugin for antivirus scanning and the DKIM signing for our outgoing mails.

The system enables end users to manage their own whitelists/blacklists and provides our service desk with the means to troubleshoot email delivery issues with ease.

On-box DKIM and DMARC features let us secure our email flows and reduce the risk of our domains being used for spamming.

Administration of the email domains and custom filters are easily done via the web interface.

The user interface could be updated. Better dashboards and more interactive overviews would be nice, but the current functionality is sufficient.

Three to five years.

The Cisco Email Security Appliance has enabled us to reduce spam by at least 30% compared to our previous solution.

I have experience as an SE for IronPort as well as a private consultant. I have used this solution in multiple environments.

I have been able to help customers improve their email security, both new customers purchasing Cisco Secure Email Gateway, as well as long-time users. 

The most valuable features are Advanced Malware Protection, URL filtering, and of course Reputation Filtering.

The reporting functionality needs to be improved.

I have been using Cisco Email Security for nearly 15 years.

We chose Cisco Iron Port as it delivers strong email security protection and our company needed it to protect the company's email systems from spam, email viruses, .exe files, unwanted email from unwanted sender etc. For this, we choose Cisco Iron Port c160. Cisco Iron Port is a solid 1U appliance, no need for additional hardware, easy to plug into existing network. Email channel protection worked across the board without regard for which email client we used. When Cisco engineers became aware of the XML file rule not working as designed they immediately recorded this in their internal issues database and provided us with an issue ID. More significantly, they quickly supplied a workaround that allowed us to block XML files using a different type of rule.

More than a few steps are required to apply rules and these are not essentially intuitive. Even though we were able to get real-time event information from the email logs, it would be nice if the higher-level journalism tools could synchronize more quickly. Price might be an obstacle for smaller networks. Need to reduce the price so that small organizations can use this product.

Our company was facing a problem of user complaints with network performance despite the fact that we used Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS. When we scanned the mail server with antivirus we found a lot of threats that couldn't be treated, so we need to use IronPort. Cisco IronPort mail security was very helpful by blocking threats, viruses, worms and Trojans from attacking the mail accounts and user PCs.

-Added cost and delay to the network traffic, but performance did remain stable. -Requires knowledge and operation time to manage an added security device to the network devices besides IPS and ASA.

Cisco IronPort is Cisco's new network access controller (NAC). Cisco IronPort email and web security products are used online with the firewall Cisco ASA and Cisco IPS to filter attacks, threats, phishing and data loss.

• Cost-effective since they do not require extra hardware • They are simple to plug into the available network • Protection of mail channel works well regardless of the email client used • Efficient to troubleshoot

• Requires several actions to employ rules • It takes time to harmonize information from the email log events with higher level reporting tools

Security risks presented by web-based malware, spyware and web traffic exposes organizations to compliance and productivity dangers introduced by improper usage of the web within the organization. IronPort allows visibility into the problem and an easy way to pinpoint policy offenders. It includes a user friendly interface and easy content incorporation, filtering and reporting infrastructure.

I have deployed Cisco Secure Email for various companies, including production companies and municipal territories. I have several customers using Cisco Secure Email, primarily for enhancing their email security.

Cisco Secure Email includes two products: the Email Security Gateway and the Email Threat Defense. The most valuable product, in my opinion, is the Email Threat Defense, particularly for those using Office 365. It is highly effective in catching phishing and spam emails.

The user interface of the Email Security Gateway should be improved. It would be beneficial to have the functionality of the Email Threat Defense integrated into the Email Security Gateway so customers don't have to buy two products for full email protection.

I have been working with Cisco Secure Email for the last five years.

Based on my experience, the stability of Cisco Secure Email is very strong.

Cisco Secure Email is highly scalable, suitable for all company sizes.

The technical support from Cisco is perfect.

Positive

The setup of Email Threat Defense is very simple. However, the setup for the Email Security Gateway can be complex.

The pricing structure is good as it is user-based or email client-based, which is positive for clients.

The main competitor for Cisco Secure Email is Microsoft 365. Most customers already have features included in Office 365, so they don't see the need for an additional protection tool.

Overall, I would rate Cisco Secure Email an eight out of ten. Although many customers think they have full protection with Office 365, Cisco Secure Email enhances email security and I rate it an 8.

Public Cloud

Other