Aastra Clearspan vs Cisco Unified Communications comparison

Mitel and Cisco are both solutions in the Unified Communications category. Mitel is ranked #23, while Cisco is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.0. Mitel holds a 0.4% mindshare in UC, compared to Cisco’s 15.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution.

Aastra Clearspan

35 Views
21 Comparison Views

Cisco Unified Communications

Read 7 Cisco Unified Communications reviews

639 Views
550 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aastra Clearspan

Cisco Unified Communications

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aastra Clearspan and Cisco Unified Communications based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, 3CX, Kamailio and others in Unified Communications.

To learn more, read our detailed Unified Communications Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Unified Communications

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aastra Clearspan

Ranking in Unified Communications

23rd

Ranking in IP Telephony & Unified Communications

19th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Unified Communications

Ranking in Unified Communications

1st

Ranking in IP Telephony & Unified Communications

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Unified Communications category, the mindshare of Aastra Clearspan is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Unified Communications is 15.0%, up from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Communications

Featured Reviews

Use Aastra Clearspan?

Share your opinion

Kani Kumar J

Cisco VOIP Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reliable customer communication and good third-party integrations with minor server update issues

Cisco supports third-party gadgets, including workforce management systems. These can be directly integrated with Cisco, a feature not widely supported by other contact centers. Additionally, redundancy is set up, meaning if one side of the server goes down, the other side will take over to prevent the contact center from completely failing.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Communications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

University

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Cisco Unified Communications?

Sometimes, minor temporary issues can arise while updating the servers. These updates can cause bugs that lead to temporary issues. Although they do not have a major impact, these issues still need...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Unified Communications?

It is basically a contact center solution. In contact centers, it acts as a bridge connecting the customer and the product company and the end customer. For example, if we are running a bank, the c...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Unified Communications?

The pricing varies based on the setup. ECCX has lower pricing for up to 400 users, whereas PCC is more expensive. Pricing increases based on requirements and features.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Skype for Business vs Cisco Unified Communications

Compared 33% of the time

Fortinet FortiVoice vs Cisco Unified Communications

Compared 33% of the time

Cisco Jabber vs Cisco Unified Communications

Compared 12% of the time

Siemens OpenScape vs Cisco Unified Communications

Compared 9% of the time

Kamailio SIP Server vs Cisco Unified Communications

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco Unified Communications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Unified Communications

November 2024

Download Aastra Clearspan product report

Buyer's Guide

Unified Communications

November 2024

Download Cisco Unified Communications product report

Also Known As

Clearspan

No data available

Learn More

Mitel

Cisco

Overview

Aastra Clearspan has a full suite of applications built in such as unified messaging, conferencing, fixed mobile convergence, and desktop integration. It integrates seamlessly with popular collaboration platforms, and includes a robust interface for integration with customer business processes. Clearspan has also simplified deployment with our proprietary OpEasy tool for provisioning, monitoring and reporting.

With Cisco Voice and Unified Communications, you can unify all your voice, video, data, and mobile applications for interactive collaboration.

Sample Customers

Tessie Cleveland Community Services Corporation

Afni, Allied Irish Banks, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital Colorado, Erickson Living, IDEALondon, Instituto Zaldivar, John Lewis, Linz AG, London Hydro, Lone Star College System, Lone Star College System, Mondi Group, North West Redwater, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, Pilatus, Pirelli, Portugal Ministry, Presidio Inc., Republic Bank & Trust Company, Saipem, SickKids Foundation, Top Right Group, Vital Images

Buyer's Guide

Unified Communications

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, 3CX, Kamailio and others in Unified Communications. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Unified Communications vendors and best IP Telephony & Unified Communications vendors.

We monitor all Unified Communications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.