Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs CA Process Automation comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Broadcom are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.5, while Broadcom is ranked #35. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to Broadcom’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
ActiveBatch by Redwood
Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews
  • 781 Views
  • 255 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
CA Process Automation
Read 12 CA Process Automation reviews
  • 300 Views
  • 106 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CA Process Automation and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competitors in the automation software market. While CA Process Automation is favored for its affordability and strong support, ActiveBatch is preferred for its comprehensive feature set justifying its higher cost.

Features: CA Process Automation offers robust workflow automation, seamless third-party integrations, and user-friendliness. ActiveBatch provides sophisticated job scheduling, extensive customization, and enterprise-focused capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CA Process Automation could enhance its scalability, expand its feature set, and improve user accessibility for non-technical users. ActiveBatch may benefit from a simplified deployment process, enhanced usability for new users, and reduced configuration complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Process Automation is known for its easy deployment and accessible customer support, appealing to small businesses. ActiveBatch, though complex, provides dedicated support and comprehensive documentation, ideal for large enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: CA Process Automation offers cost-effective pricing with quick return on investment. ActiveBatch requires a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI through its advanced automation features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,129 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood
Ranking in Process Automation
6th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Workload Automation (6th)
CA Process Automation
Ranking in Process Automation
35th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Process Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation
Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.
Read full review
it_user464568 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides the ability to import objects as new versions of existing objects and to make the prior version the current version.
CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing. As an example, swim lanes within a process provide an excellent means of organizing operators within a process, but they can introduce substantial performance issues. As another example, it’s better to perform verbose JavaScript execution within a Run JavaScript operator instead of within another operator’s pre- or post-execution script. As yet another example, it’s better to hard-code variables within the process dataset as opposed to creating the variables at run-time. The biggest issue for me is its lack of support for current JavaScript methods and functions, which makes scripts unnecessarily longer than they need to be. It seemed I could only rely on the methods and functions available in ECMA 1 (which was released in 1997), but that wasn’t a deal-breaker and the product is capable of extending its capabilities through the inclusion of other code libraries.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."
"ActiveBatch helped us automate and schedule routine tasks such as data backups, file transfers, database updates, and report generation, which frees IT staff to focus on other studies."
"Easy to configure and simple to develop new features."
"ActiveBatch has reduced work by providing automated workflows across several different applications."
"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."
"What ActiveBatch allows you to do is develop a more efficient process. It gave me visibility into all my jobs so I could choose which jobs to run in parallel. This is much easier than when I have to try to do it through cron for Windows XP, where you really can't do things in parallel and know what is going on."
"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."
"The automation feature is a very valuable feature as the associates do not have to worry about performing repetitive tasks (i.e. endpoint security scans on a daily basis) that would take several hours to complete on a daily basis."
More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros
"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."
"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
 

Cons

"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."
"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."
"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."
"ActiveBatch is a little complex."
"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."
"An area for improvement in ActiveBatch Workload Automation is its interface or GUI. It could be a little better. There isn't any additional feature I'd like to see in the tool, except for the GUI, everything looks good."
"I have faced struggles to understand, set up the tool, and implement it in my early days as a new user."
"I can't get the cleaning up of logs to work consistently. Right now, we are not setup correctly, and maybe it is something that I have not effectively communicated to them."
More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons
"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."
"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."
"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."
"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."
"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."
"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."
"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."
"It allows for lower operational overhead."
"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."
"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."
"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Retailer
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...
See all answers
What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 29% of the time
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 24% of the time
Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 11% of the time
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 10% of the time
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 7% of the time
More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors
BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs CA Process Automation Logo
BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs CA Process Automation
Compared 100% of the time
More CA Process Automation Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood
December 2024
ActiveBatch by Redwood reportDownload ActiveBatch by Redwood product report
Buyer's Guide
CA Process Automation
December 2024
CA Process Automation reportDownload CA Process Automation product report
 

Also Known As

ActiveBatch
CA IT Process Automation Manager
 

Learn More

ActiveBatch by Redwood
Broadcom
 

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?
  • Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
  • Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
  • Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
  • PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
  • Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
  • File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
  • Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
  • API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
  • Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
  • Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
  • Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
  • Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
  • Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
  • Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

CA Process Automation is designed to speed the delivery of IT services while helping to remove manual errors. By defining, automating and orchestrating processes across organizational silos that use disparate systems, CA Process Automation helps improve productivity while also enforcing standards. With CA Process Automation, you can automate IT processes that span multiple organizations and systems, reduce the time it takes to deliver services and enforce standards and compliance policies across departments. CA Process Automation helps you automate IT processes to reduce operational expenses, increase staff productivity, speed IT service delivery, improve service quality, and enforce compliance policies.
 

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital
Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis
Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation
December 2024
Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. CA Process Automation report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.