ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Comindware Tracker comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Comindware are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.5, while Comindware is ranked #41. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to Comindware’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Comindware users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

664 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comindware Tracker

Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews

126 Views
44 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Comindware Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Comindware Tracker and ActiveBatch by Redwood compete in the business process management and automation space. ActiveBatch is often preferred for its robust features, indicating it delivers more value despite Comindware's appeal in pricing and support.

Features: Comindware Tracker offers an intuitive workflow design, real-time reporting, and scalability, benefiting mid-sized organizations. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides advanced scheduling, extensive integration capabilities, and powerful automation features, making it suitable for larger enterprises needing comprehensive solutions.

Room for Improvement: Comindware Tracker could enhance its feature set to cater more to enterprise users, offer more advanced integration options, and improve automation complexity handling. ActiveBatch by Redwood may benefit from simplification of its setup process, improvements in ease of use for less technical users, and enhancement of its user interface experience for smoother navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Comindware Tracker's cloud-based deployment allows for quick implementation with structured support. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers flexible deployment but might require more setup time. Comindware ensures consistently available customer service, while ActiveBatch caters to complex environments with extensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Comindware Tracker provides a cost-effective upfront investment promising quicker ROI for businesses. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a higher initial investment but offers long-term value with its extensive automation capabilities and efficiency improvements, justifying its cost for companies needing advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Workload Automation (4th)

Comindware Tracker

Ranking in Process Automation

41st

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (51st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Comindware Tracker is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Nisha Senarathne

Works

Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop

Comindware is great for workflow management. It's user-friendly and trustworthy. You don't need technical skills to develop, maintain and update workflows. Using the intuitive web-based user interface of the visual workflow builder, you can design and set up workflows. Comindware Tracker is a good…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible."

"The nice thing about ActiveBatch is once we have created a specific job that can be easily be replicated to another job, then minimal changes will have to be made. This makes things nice. Reduction of coding is substantial in a lot of cases. The replication of one job to another is just doing a few minor tweaks and rolling it into production. This decreases our development costs substantially."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."

"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."

"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

More Comindware Tracker pros

Cons

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

"The monitoring dashboard could have been more user-friendly so that in the monitoring dashboard itself we can see the total number of jobs created in the system and how many were currently active/scheduled/chained."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"The thing I've noticed the most is the Help function. It's very difficult, at times, to find examples of how to do something. The Help function will explain what the tool does, but we're not a Windows shop at the data warehouse. Our data warehouse jobs actually run on Linux servers. Finding things for Linux-based solutions is not as easy as it is for Windows-based solutions. I would like to see more examples, and more non-Windows examples as well, in the Help."

"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"Any product is going to have some room for improvement, no matter what. I see the company has already ventured into AWS and they're constantly trying to improve the managed file transfer which they have recently improvised. I think they bought a software called JSCAPE and they're trying to improve it, which is good. I am not sure if JSCAPE would be part of the base product but currently, you have to buy a separate license for it, which doesn't make sense. If it was Microsoft, ServiceNow, or integrating with other software vendors, I would understand but JSCAPE is now in-house and I'm not sure if they can justify having a separate license for JSCAPE. I would probably expect them to be packaging JSCAPE into the base product. They did switch over from a perpetual license model to a subscription model, which hurt the company a little bit. Nobody is offering the perpetual model anymore. As long as the transition is fair for both the companies, I think it should be fine and not burn us out."

"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

More Comindware Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Great value for the money."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"The price is so reasonable."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 20% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

April 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Comindware Tracker

April 2025

Download Comindware Tracker product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
Unified Document and Data Management
Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.

Comindware

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

April 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Comindware Tracker report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.