Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightVM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
Acunetix offers a positive ROI by enhancing security, reducing tester needs, saving costs, and improving risk management.
Sentiment score
6.9
Organizations value Rapid7 InsightVM for effective threat prevention and cost-saving, noting its crucial role in vulnerability management.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Acunetix customer support is responsive but can be slow, especially in urgent cases, with resellers often contacting first.
Sentiment score
6.7
Rapid7 InsightVM customer service is well-rated, valued for quality, though occasionally affected by delays and language barriers.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
The technical support from Acunetix is quite good
Support is not available promptly, especially when issues are escalated to another region.
Sometimes support requests coincide with holidays in their support region, causing slight delays.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Acunetix offers flexible scalability, praised for adaptability and ease of use, with varied experiences depending on use cases.
Sentiment score
7.7
Rapid7 InsightVM offers scalable, flexible, and efficient asset management, seamlessly integrating into various environments for large infrastructure deployments.
Integration with other tools has been fine, with no major issues reported.
According to the environment requirements, we can scale the solution as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Acunetix boasts stable performance and reliable scans, with minor glitches in upgrades and praised support, earning high ratings.
Sentiment score
8.1
Rapid7 InsightVM is generally stable and reliable, with minor exceptions related to resource usage and server communication.
We have not faced any issues with stability, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
The stability of Rapid7 InsightVM is excellent.
There have been some challenges, especially with support response times, which affect stability.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improved capabilities in Acunetix, including better security testing, reduced false positives, and enhanced integration and reporting options.
Rapid7 InsightVM faces challenges in integration, API functionality, pricing, usability, support, and lacks built-in patch management features.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
The major improvement needed is prompt support.
Having the ability to build our own audit file, similar to a feature in Tenable, would be beneficial.
The platform could be more intuitive and user-friendly.
 

Setup Cost

Acunetix pricing can be expensive with complex licensing, prompting some to consider flexible alternatives like Burp Suite.
Rapid7 InsightVM's pricing receives mixed reviews; users value flexibility but often wish for more competitive costs.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions in the market.
Rapid7 InsightVM is expensive, possibly one of the highest in pricing among similar products.
 

Valuable Features

Acunetix efficiently identifies security risks with in-depth testing, a user-friendly UI, and seamless integration into developer environments.
InsightVM excels in vulnerability management with effective scanning, user-friendly features, and seamless integration for swift risk mitigation.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
It's based on the CVSS risk scoring system, which is well-recognized and effective.
Customers are interested in this product as it helps heighten their cybersecurity posture.
We have integrated our SIEM solutions and antivirus with each other through Rapid7.
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (17th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), Vulnerability Management (23rd), DevSecOps (6th)
Rapid7 InsightVM
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Acunetix is designed for Application Security Tools and holds a mindshare of 2.7%, up 2.2% compared to last year.
Rapid7 InsightVM, on the other hand, focuses on Risk-Based Vulnerability Management, holds 14.4% mindshare, up 14.0% since last year.
Application Security Tools
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami - PeerSpot reviewer
Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup
The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…
Mahmoud Elhamaymy - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable scanning and integration strengthen security infrastructure
InsightVM has a very organized GUI with ease of use. The vulnerability scans are reliable, and the credential scan is a beneficial feature. The solution is efficient and trustworthy. It's based on the CVSS risk scoring system, which is well-recognized and effective. The integration capabilities through APIs allow easy integration with existing security infrastructure.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.
How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 InsightVM?
Pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions in the market. Customers are generally satisfied and do not ask for drastic price reductions during renewals.
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
InsightVM, NeXpose
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Rapid7 InsightVM and other solutions. Updated: March 2023.
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.