Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Experience Manager vs OpenText Documentum comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Adobe Experience Manager support is skilled but slow, varying by company size, focusing on base issues over custom code.
Sentiment score
6.0
OpenText's customer service is improving, though users experience occasional delays and limited support for older versions.
They are attentive to big companies but tend to be negligent towards mid-sized companies.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.1
Adobe Experience Manager faces criticism for its high cost, complexity, limited documentation, inefficient support, and challenging integration with Microsoft.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Documentum faces challenges with outdated interface, performance, integration, customization, scalability, pricing, documentation, and AI integration.
Technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
Design and newer functionality should always be evolved.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Adobe Experience Manager efficiently scales for large enterprises, handling load stress, easy customization, and smooth cloud migration post-transition.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum excels in scalability, supporting numerous users and offering integration flexibility for large-scale implementations.
Never had to scale to meet demand.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Adobe Experience Manager is expensive with variable licensing, but efficient for large websites and offers a one-month free trial.
Sentiment score
4.0
OpenText Documentum's pricing is high, complex, and varies, though recent improvements offer affordability and benefits for government agencies.
For large enterprises, the cost is often comparable with other major CMSs.
It might be considered expensive for small enterprises, but the value it provides justifies the cost.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Adobe Experience Manager is stable and secure, with cloud version benefits, despite some setup and integration issues.
Sentiment score
7.7
OpenText Documentum is stable and reliable, with minor sub-product issues, earning high user ratings in the ECM market.
we found the system to be reliable
For example, database connections could be improved.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Adobe Experience Manager offers ease of use, integration with Adobe Marketing Cloud, and robust tools for digital asset and content management.
Sentiment score
7.8
OpenText Documentum ensures secure, scalable content management with integration, versioning, and compliance, supporting efficient business processes across departments.
The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Version Tree Branching allows for simultaneous collaborative work on different versions of a document.
The product is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (3rd), Enterprise Social Software (5th), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (1st)
OpenText Documentum
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Documentum is 11.8%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

Prince Shivhare - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing content is very user-friendly, AEM makes maintenance simple and auto-scalable
Area of improvement for Cloud Service: For the last four years, I've been working on AEM as a Cloud Service. I feel the tool has all the features needed for production, but the problem is with skills. Depending on the skill level of the developers building the components within Adobe Experience Manager, you can have a very streamlined implementation or a very difficult one. Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user faces issues in AEM as a Cloud Service. If I reach out to Adobe for something, they create a ticket, and then I might wait three to four days for a response. When I have issues, I want an immediate response. On AEM as a Cloud Service, this is the one thing I think Adobe needs to improve. They should resolve issues within a day so everything runs smoothly for the user. Area of improvement for on-premises: For on-premises AEM, everything is managed by us, but since Adobe Experience Manager was not a very big market earlier (though it's growing now), there are limited clients. The cost of the tool is high, and maintenance is heavy – it's very costly. So, the developers working in AEM development might not always have the proper skills to develop the components. For example, in a normal website, we often see carousels which represent your website in a very dynamic way. Now, suppose you have two carousels on the page – one at the top and the next at the bottom. They have different purposes. If I'm a skilled developer, I'll create one component and serve both banners with the same component – a single, dynamic component. This makes it easy for content editors in the production environment to drag, drop, and change the content. But, if I'm not an experienced developer or I don't have knowledge of AEM, I might create two components – one for the top and one for the bottom. Maintenance becomes heavy, and it's harder for the content team to understand which component to use. A less experienced developer might create multiple components for the same function, increasing complexity and challenges. Over the last three to four years, this lack of resources and skilled AM developers has created these kinds of issues.
Kabir Jakkamsetti - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used to automate the storage of metadata and content, but it add some AI integrations
I think security's been pretty good with OpenText Documentum. Currently, we are on an older product, and we are about to start a migration. I think the configurability should be much more improved with that. OpenText Documentum has helped boost productivity within our organization. By automating a lot of business processes with workflows, we've been able to improve productivity. OpenText Documentum has definitely helped simplify or accelerate our modernization journey. Overall, I rate OpenText Documentum a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?
It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.
What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?
Adobe Experience Manager could improve by allowing the reuse of components like a progress bar across multiple pages to make the development process more efficient. Currently, changes have to be ma...
What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?
I am a full stack developer, focusing more on the front end. I work with frameworks like React and JavaScript. I would like to give a review about Adobe Experience Manager, which I have used for ma...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Documentum?
It falls in line with a lot of things that are out there on the market. There is nothing extraordinary in terms of great or bad.
What do you like most about OpenText Documentum?
The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role.
What needs improvement with OpenText Documentum?
The main thing is the cost. Most of the time, organizations move away from Documentum due to cost. It's highly-priced, and the support costs are high. Now, SharePoint and other options. Microsoft g...
 

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud
Dell EMC Documentum, Documentum , Documentum xCelerated Composition Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Metra
Agility; Bibliotheca Alexandrina; Capitec Bank; Department of Social Development, Republic of South Africa; County of Los Angeles, Department of Human Resources; Fresenius Kabi; Heathrow Airport; Lahey Health; Linde PLC; Milestone Pharma Co. Ltd; National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; Open Grid Europe GmbH; REPCO NEX Industrial Solutions; Springer Nature; Syngene International; Tata Power DDL; University of Texas Austin
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Experience Manager vs. OpenText Documentum and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.