Adobe Experience Manager and OpenText Documentum compete in the content management system category. Adobe Experience Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its deep integration with Adobe Marketing Cloud enhancing content and digital marketing management.
Features: AEM integrates seamlessly with Adobe Marketing Cloud, offering comprehensive digital marketing tools. Key capabilities include digital asset management, analytics, and 3D asset repurposing. Documentum is strong in content server capabilities, secure document storage, and metadata management, suitable for complex content lifecycle demands.
Room for Improvement: AEM users face challenges with high total cost of ownership and complex integration in Microsoft environments, with slow cloud support. Documentum users cite high costs and outdated UI features, along with concerns over cloud security and file format support. Both could improve documentation and AI and workflow integration features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AEM supports multiple deployment options, with technically responsive but sometimes slow support. Documentum excels in on-premises deployment but is criticized for being less cloud-ready with a need for enhanced customer service responsiveness and documentation quality.
Pricing and ROI: AEM's high costs are mitigated by strong ROI from advanced analytics and content management, fitting for large-scale enterprises. Documentum offers competitive pricing but may incur high costs due to support and licensing, delivering ROI through stability and security in document management.
They are attentive to big companies but tend to be negligent towards mid-sized companies.
My involvement was not only user level, but development integration level also.
Technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.
It would be beneficial to have more ability to customize features for specific use cases.
Design and newer functionality should always be evolved.
The price is quite high as the licensing prices are significant.
Never had to scale to meet demand.
For large enterprises, the cost is often comparable with other major CMSs.
It might be considered expensive for small enterprises, but the value it provides justifies the cost.
It is quite expensive.
The licensing price is quite high.
we found the system to be reliable
For example, database connections could be improved.
The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive.
The most valuable feature is the good automation engine, which helps in reducing the development cost and allows easy development of applications.
Version Tree Branching allows for simultaneous collaborative work on different versions of a document.
The product is user-friendly.
Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.