Adobe Experience Manager vs SAP Jam comparison

Adobe and SAP are both solutions in the Enterprise Social Software category. Adobe is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 10.0. Adobe holds a 3.1% mindshare in ESS, compared to SAP’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Adobe Experience Manager

Read 20 Adobe Experience Manager reviews

214 Views
148 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAP Jam

Read 5 SAP Jam reviews

257 Views
173 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

SAP Jam

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Adobe Experience Manager and SAP Jam are competing within the digital content and collaboration market. Adobe Experience Manager is preferred for its robust content management capabilities, while SAP Jam leads in facilitating team collaboration.

Features: Adobe Experience Manager includes advanced marketing tools, seamless integration with Adobe products, and strong content workflow capabilities. SAP Jam offers document management, excellent collaboration features, and social networking options, enhancing organizational communication.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Experience Manager can improve its deployment process, reduce initial setup complexity, and enhance user interface intuitiveness. SAP Jam could benefit from expanding its integration capabilities, providing more advanced analytics features, and improving its mobile app interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Experience Manager has a complex deployment process but offers comprehensive support and training. SAP Jam provides a quicker deployment experience and efficient customer service, helping ease the setup for businesses.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Experience Manager involves a higher initial cost but offers significant ROI with extensive features. SAP Jam has a more budget-friendly pricing model with a quick return on investment through its effective collaboration tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,989 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager

Ranking in Enterprise Social Software

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (8th), Web Content Management (3rd), Digital Experience Platforms (DXP) (1st)

SAP Jam

Ranking in Enterprise Social Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 3.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Jam is 3.2%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Social Software

Featured Reviews

Thomas Becker

Managing Partner(Austria) at a integrator with 11-50 employees

Impressive integration of customer behavior with an easy setup and okay support

I've worked with all major content management systems. Currently, I work with the leaders such as Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and Acquia Working with big companies, I help them either consider setting up a new content management system or address issues they might have with their existing…

Read full review

AhmedHaridy

Managing Director at Emkan

A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization

It's undoubtedly more complex compared to the initial part. It depends on the requirements. You can't categorically say that HubSpot is only suitable for smaller devices; it's adaptable to various needs. Depending on the requirements, you can have a project completed within as little as six months or as long as a few years. It's a flexible solution that can cater to your specific needs. However, it's essential to start from the beginning, designing the screens and pages within HubSpot. It's somewhat similar to building a website but generally more straightforward to use. You need to input the necessary information based on your specific requirements, and it's not limited to a predefined structure. The team initiates the process with what we term as solution design, but it's more appropriately labeled as enterprise design. This initial phase involves understanding the integration points with other systems and commencing the configuration process. It's essentially the starting point for our analysis. The analysis covers several aspects, including the language requirements, integration tools for interfacing with Java server solutions, and how to effectively use these tools. All these components must seamlessly complement each other. Once the team has everything in place and confirms the tools, they can proceed to elaborate on the specific requirements. The deployment timeline typically ranges from four to six months, specifically for straightforward or standard requirements. However, in the case of a large enterprise organization with numerous legal entities across different countries, each requiring unique interfaces for various purposes, the implementation duration is highly dependent on the specific requirements. It's not feasible to provide a fixed period for such a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy to work with the solution."

"Adobe Experience Manager is a content management system, and we use it to create and manage a website."

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution."

"If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR."

"Adobe Experience Manager is quite a powerful product that you can use to design files and export them."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

"The most valuable features of Adobe Experience Manager include its capability to manage content and create reusable fragments."

More Adobe Experience Manager pros

"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."

Cons

"The latest trend is to render everything in the client-side framework. For example, SPA or single page application. This is a feature that needs improvement. The cloud deployment pipeline needs to be improved as well."

"A little bit of background knowledge of coding and website structure is required."

"The solution's pricing and stability could be improved."

"I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"Adobe Experience Manager's pricing could be improved."

"Adobe's technical support is so-so."

"The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies."

More Adobe Experience Manager cons

"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"It's really costly."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license and implementation fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

42%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?

It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?

While there are many aspects that could be improved, discussing them would require more time. The licensing model is opaque, and technical support could be improved, especially for smaller companies.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?

I've worked with all major content management systems. Currently, I work with the leaders such as Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and Acquia.

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Jam?

One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Jam?

You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Jam?

SAP JAM is currently working in conjunction with other SAP solutions, specifically integrated with Microsoft Teams. I anticipate that it will have further integrations with various other solutions....

See all answers

Comparisons

Adobe CQ5 vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText TeamSite vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More Adobe Experience Manager Competitors

Yammer vs SAP Jam

Compared 58% of the time

SharePoint vs SAP Jam

Compared 42% of the time

More SAP Jam Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager

April 2025

Download Adobe Experience Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Social Software

April 2025

Download SAP Jam product report

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud

No data available

Overview

Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.

Adobe

Encourage and facilitate collaboration in the cloud _ with our enterprise social network solution, SAP Jam.

SAP

Sample Customers

Metra

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Medtronic, Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Plan International, Sailing Team Germany, Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection, SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequi

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam

April 2025

Free Report: Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adobe Experience Manager vs. SAP Jam report.

See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.