Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ADOIT vs iServer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
iServer is scalable for diverse organizations, efficiently supporting teams of various sizes, with minimal performance concerns affecting scalability.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
iServer's features include process modeling, Microsoft Office integration, customization, and SharePoint compatibility, enhancing enterprise architecture efficiency and ease of use.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.3
iServer needs UI and performance improvements, enhanced integration, better licensing, data modeling, customization, security, and visualization capabilities.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
iServer is highly rated for stability and seamless Visio integration, with emphasis on synchronization, permissions, and user training.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Customer service is praised for responsiveness and helpfulness, with high satisfaction ratings and a desire for localized support.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
iServer's pricing varies with commitment duration, starting at $13K, making it feasible mainly for larger enterprises.
 

Categories and Ranking

ADOIT
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
iServer
Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management
7th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of ADOIT is 2.9%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iServer is 4.4%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Architecture Management
 

Featured Reviews

Janne Kemppainen - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to track the life cycle of products and services, and understand their costs
The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs. The most beneficial feature has been reporting. Being able to track the life cycle of products and services and understand their costs has been crucial. However, I've also been exploring other features that allow us to evaluate tools from both the business and technical sides. The tool was easy to get started with. Some of the reporting features have been particularly useful for our company management. I've built reports showing the costs of running the company and the processes running beneath them. Additionally, I've used it for lifecycle management from a technical perspective. I discovered a feature I haven't tried yet: exporting data to HTML. This allows for neatly gathered reports in one place where you can search through them via HTML and find what you need.
Antonios Lazanakis - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, easy to use, and easy to import data
We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model. It is very easy to import data, and we also have good integration with Visual Drawing Tools and SharePoint. The solution is…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Retailer
7%
Educational Organization
36%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADOIT?
The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system.
What is your primary use case for ADOIT?
The solution describes the enterprise architecture for the company, encompassing everything from the business side to the technical aspects.
What advice do you have for others considering ADOIT?
The tool is still being integrated into our enterprise architecture. It serves as a tool for gathering and providing information, but it hasn't yet directly solved a critical business issue for me....
What do you like most about iServer?
iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management.
What needs improvement with iServer?
iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io. draw.io is a drawing tool used to draw architectural diagrams, flow diagrams, etc. It is an alternative to...
What is your primary use case for iServer?
We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti
Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard
Find out what your peers are saying about ADOIT vs. iServer and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.