BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs iServer comparison

BiZZdesign and Orbus Software are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BiZZdesign is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Orbus Software is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. BiZZdesign holds a 4.8% mindshare in AM, compared to Orbus Software’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BiZZdesign users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Orbus Software users who would recommend it.

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Read 17 BiZZdesign HoriZZon reviews

2,171 Views
960 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

iServer

Read 18 iServer reviews

2,481 Views
1,012 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

iServer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

iServer and BiZZdesign HoriZZon compete in the enterprise architecture tool space. BiZZdesign HoriZZon is perceived to have an edge with its robust features, while iServer stands out in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

Features: iServer offers flexible deployment options, strong integration capabilities, and valuable workflow management, making it ideal for diverse IT environments. BiZZdesign HoriZZon provides advanced modeling and analysis features, seamless integration with ServiceNow and SQL, and comprehensive dashboards, distinguishing it as a cutting-edge solution.

Room for Improvement: iServer could enhance its user interface for even better usability and expand its customization options. Improved documentation and a more intuitive setup process would further benefit users. BiZZdesign HoriZZon can improve its initial setup complexity, offer more pricing options to suit smaller teams, and streamline its learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iServer is noted for its straightforward deployment model and efficient customer support, facilitating a smooth onboarding experience. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, while having a rich deployment model, involves a more complex setup, but it offers highly responsive customer service to support integration and ongoing use.

Pricing and ROI: iServer is known for its affordability, offering an appealing setup cost and a pricing model focused on long-term value, suitable for cost-sensitive teams. BiZZdesign HoriZZon, although more expensive, provides substantial returns on investment through its extensive capabilities and organizational impact, which justifies higher costs for those needing a comprehensive solution.

To learn more, read our detailed BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

6th

Ranking in Business Process Design

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

iServer

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

7th

Ranking in Business Process Design

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of BiZZdesign HoriZZon is 4.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iServer is 4.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

BijoyTalukder

Enterprise Architect at Tata Consultancy

Helps to get a clear overview of our enterprise architecture, especially when dealing with multiple departments

One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs. While the platform offers REST APIs, they have limitations when it comes to retrieving and exporting data. Obtaining detailed information at the individual application or component level, including IDs, costs, and deployment-related data, can be challenging through these APIs. This limitation makes it difficult to smoothly export such granular data. I have raised this issue with the BiZZdesign team, and they expressed interest in addressing it, but I'm not aware of the current status of this improvement effort. Nonetheless, improving the usability and flexibility of the REST APIs for data extraction is an area that could enhance the platform's capabilities.

Read full review

Antonios Lazanakis

Senior IT Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Flexible, easy to use, and easy to import data

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization iServer is a very flexible platform for defining your own enterprise architecture model. It is very easy to import data, and we also have good integration with Visual Drawing Tools and SharePoint. The solution is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool."

"It is very easy to use. I can just click on an application component and find out if we are using this particular component. This provides us flexibility."

"BiZZdesign HoriZZon is scalable, and I'd give it an eight out of ten for scalability. Our customers are enterprise level companies, but the solution is suitable for small and mid-sized companies as well."

"The tool's most valuable feature is that its collaboration part is very good."

"The powerful editing function in teamwork project-based, common or shared modeling, based on a powerful repository and knowledge sharing in a portal are the most valuable features. These are the most important features for me. I can add the integration of individual modeling notations like Archimate plus BPMN and DMN, and so on. We travel from one location to another and the tool allows us to keep track."

"t's a good tool. My colleagues that are making use of it for application, business processes, or data modeling, are very satisfied with it. They find it easy to use. The graphical representation is simple but therefore efficient, so I know that they are planning a very good commencement on the use of these tools."

"The enterprise studio where the modelling happens is valuable."

"The feature I find most valuable is that the start times and loading times are short. It takes only a few seconds to load the repository and whenever I want to open diagrams, they are there almost immediately."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon pros

"I have to think less with this solution. It's simple."

"Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time."

"The product has a valuable customized model."

"The initial setup is easy."

"iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management."

"The most valuable feature is its reporting capability. It offers various packages for different types of reports, such as business and project management reporting packs."

"The solution has wide use within Microsoft products. The integration with Microsoft products, and, in particular, Microsoft Office, is great."

"The most valuable features of iServer are the integration with Microsoft Office and the interface is similar to Microsoft applications making them easy to use."

More iServer pros

Cons

"Integration definitely needs improvement. There are some restrictions. We've seen that it doesn't integrate with everything we might expect."

"The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult."

"We tested it, and we had support from BiZZdesign, including patches, but it just didn't do what we wanted."

"Scalability is a bit of a problem for BiZZdesign. There is always a possibility it will failover."

"There's room for improvement. When I finished using it over a year ago, I discussed implementing C4 notation with BiZZdesign HoriZZon.They've likely done this now, but I haven't seen it. Setting up interactive views for stakeholders to score services was a bit difficult."

"One area where BiZZdesign HoriZZon could use some improvement is in its REST APIs."

"I have seen table charts where, if the chart is a little too big, it does not fit in HoriZZon and it is not at all visible... There have been several times where we could not publish a chart properly and we had to break the chart into small tables and create multiple artifacts, creating a complete mess. This should be seriously taken up by BiZZdesign because there is a lot of scope for improvement in terms of usability. It's not at all good, unfortunately."

"In HoriZZon, there are different matrices. In some of the cases, there is an option to aggregate them, but in other cases, we have not done this, e.g., to see the proper costs. For example, if I have 10 different matrices, then I need to create an aggregate view out of those 10 matrices somewhere. That is where we have been struggling a bit. We have a counterpart from the HoriZZon product team with whom we have bi-weekly discussions. We have suggested to him that this can be improved."

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon cons

"It runs relatively slowly."

"The one issue is that if you want to import predefined work, you need to put the licensing model in. So if you wanted to import work that was done before, you then need to buy a separate product for that."

"The migration tool needs to be included in the main package, and not as a separate license."

"The performance is slow, which is something that should be improved."

"There can be some performance issues using the solution that should be improved. When you make modifications modify to files there are embedded data within that can take a while to process."

"iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io."

"The product is more expensive than Spark."

"Requirements management needs to be improved."

More iServer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of this particular product usage, my clients currently only use per-user licenses."

"If one is very cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as a seven out of ten."

"We were customers and bought licenses from them. We used their remote instance initially but upgraded to the on-device version due to lag. For pricing, we paid about 2200 pounds a year per seat for the client installation at an educational rate. I'm not sure about commercial rates. I managed to get a free copy at BBC since it was for evaluation purposes."

"The pricing model is slightly on the high side and could be more competitive for long-term partnerships."

"[The] Orbus... pricing model was based on every single functionality having a price. The pricing was comparable but if we wanted to scale, it would have ended up being a lot more expensive. BiZZdesign gave us one price with all of the functionality, and we could scale as much as we needed."

"The price is reasonable."

"I haven't found any issues with the scalability and licensing parts that are access-related."

"First and foremost within the scope of improvement for the solution would be the cost. It's very costly..."

"The product has a moderate pricing."

"It's about 13K to set up and 9K for the license for three months. I think it's about 20K a year, but we haven't firmed up on pricing yet because the price depends on how long we commit to the solution."

"They offer annual subscriptions for developing countries, which are not affordable for small or medium businesses."

"Aim for the exact number of people who shall define/review approve and view the processes, as it will impact the cost."

"The price of iServer is reasonable compared to other solutions."

"The solution is cheaper than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

30%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

35%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

This is one of the best tools, especially because of its collaborative nature. Anyone using it can access previous projects and related data. It's definitely a strong collaborative tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

The ability to generate charts and deal with a use case involving Kibana was quite difficult. We don't use the chart functionality much, and I think that is quite problematic at the moment. We have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BiZZdesign HoriZZon?

I use the solution in my company for all sorts of things, like enterprise and solution architecture. As part of our design process, BiZZdesign HoriZZon is used for road mapping. We also use it for ...

See all answers

What do you like most about iServer?

iServer has valuable features for workflow and document management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iServer?

iServer should invest in enhancing the capabilities of the embedded drawing tool, draw.io. draw.io is a drawing tool used to draw architectural diagrams, flow diagrams, etc. It is an alternative to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iServer?

We use iServer to establish an enterprise architecture function in our organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 17% of the time

ARIS BPA vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 10% of the time

Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 10% of the time

Visio vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 9% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs BiZZdesign HoriZZon

Compared 5% of the time

More BiZZdesign HoriZZon Competitors

LeanIX vs iServer

Compared 28% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs iServer

Compared 18% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs iServer

Compared 15% of the time

ARIS BPA vs iServer

Compared 12% of the time

Visio vs iServer

Compared 6% of the time

More iServer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon

March 2025

Download BiZZdesign HoriZZon product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

February 2025

Download iServer product report

Also Known As

HoriZZon

No data available

Overview

Make smarter decisions and optimize outcomes by unifying all your strategy, capabilities, operating models and change portfolios in a single platform.

With all the data about your business in one place you can see the big picture and make properly informed strategic decisions to drive growth. Bizzdesign Horizzon brings together strategy, IT architecture, operating models, data, capabilities, change portfolios and ideas into a single, intuitive collaborative business design platform. Real-time visibility of key metrics and trends allows you to take action more quickly. Accelerating the speed and accuracy of your operations now – and into the future.

Core Platform Capabilities:

Multi-discipline collaboration
Data Integration
Advanced analytics
Models and Roadmaps
Governance & Security
Business Insight Graph

BiZZdesign

iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making.

Orbus Software

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Shell, HSBC, Erasmus University, VIVAT Insurance

Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard

Buyer's Guide

BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer

March 2025

Free Report: BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer

Find out what your peers are saying about BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BiZZdesign HoriZZon vs. iServer report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors and best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.