Alfresco vs Oracle Content Management comparison

Hyland and Oracle are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Hyland is ranked #10 with an average rating of 5.5, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Hyland holds a 7.6% mindshare in ECM, compared to Oracle’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Alfresco

Read 12 Alfresco reviews

2,502 Views
2,091 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Oracle Content Management

Read 3 Oracle Content Management reviews

820 Views
693 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alfresco

Oracle Content Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Alfresco and Oracle Content Management are competing in the enterprise content management category. Alfresco holds the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas Oracle Content Management stands out with advanced features.

Features: Alfresco features open-source architecture, strong collaboration tools, and custom integration versatility. Oracle Content Management offers robust digital asset management, seamless integration with other Oracle products, and a comprehensive suite ideal for large enterprises with extensive scalability needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alfresco features simple deployment models suitable for open-source teams and a supportive customer service framework. Oracle Content Management supports cloud-based deployment, ensuring efficiency within Oracle's ecosystem, backed by extensive customer service for complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Alfresco provides appealing cost structures for smaller organizations with lower initial setup costs and solid ROI. Oracle Content Management incurs higher setup costs but offers substantial returns for businesses utilizing its full capabilities, aligning with its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Alfresco

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

10th

Ranking in Document Management Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Content Management

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

11th

Ranking in Document Management Software

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Alfresco is 7.6%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Content Management is 2.5%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Karthi Keyan

Head Of Information Technology at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Streamlining document management with enhanced digitalization features needed

We used Alfresco as a document management system for automating and digitizing manual forms. Those were the main use cases The digitalization of workflow, forms, operations, and business processes has improved our organization. The most valuable features of Alfresco include its integration with…

Read full review

Neilsen Seixas

Owner at NSTEC

Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework. It employs document management methodologies. The personalization and customization capabilities of Oracle Content Management system are highly praised by customers. When they receive responses using this solution, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Customers love the ability to customize and personalize Oracle products to suit their needs. Integrating three Oracle products into one seamless solution enhances the user experience, making it easier for end-users to engage without being aware of the individual products involved. They simply interact with the solution, streamlining their digital processes. One significant challenge that our customers faced before implementing Oracle Content Management was effectively managing a large volume of documents. They struggled with centralizing document storage and organization. However, Oracle Content Management provided a solution by centralizing document management, making it easier and more efficient to handle. The user experience, especially in terms of simplicity and design of the Oracle Content Management interface, was a priority. I utilized the Oracle Content Management API for this purpose, ensuring seamless integration with other solutions. We consolidated three solutions into one user interface through the Oracle portal, which incorporated BPM and DPM for task management. This unified interface provided a streamlined experience for customers, rather than directly interacting with the Oracle Content Management interface. Our main challenge in implementing this was using ADF from Oracle. At the time, there was a scarcity of programmers skilled in the ADF framework in Brazil, necessitating in-house training for our team of developers to successfully execute the integration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product allows engineering teams and developers to introduce new things in a seamless and easy way."

"The digitalization of workflow, forms, operations, and business processes is also significant."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata."

"The most valuable features of Alfresco include its integration with the scanning solution, the ability to search, and the capability to store and index to capture metadata."

"Alfresco allows broad searches with many index fields that you can search on, although the created fields and their values may not be intuitive."

"I like the ease of use, sections, and calendar."

"Document repository."

"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

Cons

"Alfresco has a very steep learning curve, and unfortunately, during the learning process, it's very easy to make errors, which often are unforgiving."

"Alfresco could improve workflow digitalization and enhance artificial intelligence capabilities."

"The setup process for Alfresco was complex."

"I would like them to consider document capture functionality."

"Metadata, auto class, disposition log, and legal hold."

"I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."

"The configuration of Alfresco is a big challenge."

"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."

"The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are costs for any upgrade or additional functions."

"The license for Alfresco is expensive - not the maximum, but close. There are also extra costs once you start building integrations, as implementation seems to be very costly."

"It is cheaper compared to head-to-head competitors."

"If you buy Alfresco through a partner, there is usually a OEM licensing option."

"The tool's licensing part is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Government

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Would Alfresco give an organization more benefits in terms of cost, features & security as compared to Sharepoint?

Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools. Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good. Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent. Document Management 4.12...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alfresco?

Pricing is considered mid-range, and there are considerations regarding the cost of licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Alfresco?

Alfresco could improve workflow digitalization and enhance artificial intelligence capabilities.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Content Management?

It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Content Management?

The only issue my company has with the tool is the licensing part, which is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Content Management?

I utilize Oracle Content Management to collaborate on the documents.

See all answers

Comparisons

Hyland OnBase vs Alfresco

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs Alfresco

Compared 16% of the time

SharePoint vs Alfresco

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Alfresco

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Alfresco

Compared 8% of the time

More Alfresco Competitors

Oracle WebCenter vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 40% of the time

SharePoint vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 26% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft OneDrive vs Oracle Content Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Content Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alfresco

December 2024

Download Alfresco product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

December 2024

Download Oracle Content Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Document and Process Cloud, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud

Learn More

Hyland

Oracle

Overview

The Alfresco Digital Business Platform offers open, secure content services to let you unlock the value from your most important business information. Give users access to their content wherever and however they work with Alfresco’s open, flexible, and highly scalable cloud-native content services platform. Easily integrate and connect with everyday business applications. Find, view, collaborate on, govern, and securely share digital content—and get information to the right person at the right time.

Oracle Content and Experience Cloud is a cloud-based content hub to drive omni-channel content management and accelerate experience delivery.

Sample Customers

Over 1,300 companies from 180 different countries. Including EuroStar, Saks Fifth Avenue, NASA Langley Research Center, and KLM.

TekStream Solutions LLC, NetCompany, AFG, Pride Mobility, TEAM Informatics Pty Ltd., Sutton Tools, Mythics, Inc., DVLA

Buyer's Guide

Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management

November 2024

Free Report: Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alfresco vs. Oracle Content Management report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.