We performed a comparison between Oracle Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"Its most valuable feature is the document library."
"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."
"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It's stable. It's very widely used by companies. Also, the knowledge of the product has improved over the years, and by other companies that support it or are Microsoft SharePoint partners. So if there are problems, there's always a user or company that knows the information or can help you; even with very uncommon problems."
"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"We'd like to be able to upload from MS Excel to deploy tasks and use drop-down lists to collect further information."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"Processing data from multiple site collections is not easy as they reside in different databases."
"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive, Alfresco and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle Content Management vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.