Alteryx Designer vs Toad Data Point comparison

"Alteryx Designer is easier to use for machine learning models. However, I am not very good at Python scripts which you will need to make the machine learning scripts."

"Alteryx Designer is stable."

"The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its API connections. Its predictive analytics feature has helped us pass some ETL processes to analysts rather than developers."

"The product is very stable. The performance is reliable."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The product offers very good analytics."

"One of the things I like about Alteryx Designer is how easy it is to connect numerous data inputs, including API connectors. This helps tremendously in reducing the time required to extract data from systems like SAP that don't have straightforward connectivity options."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"The product could offer more connectors and more databases with support for the in-database function."

"If the price were reduced then it would be more competitive."

"Alteryx Designer overall should be easier to use."

"Alteryx could move faster to create a cloud equivalent of the desktop version of Designer."

"Its cost can sometimes be a drawback."

"We discontinued using Alteryx's data science studio because it was not very user-friendly."

"When it comes to the pivoting part, the drill-through option is not there in Alteryx."

"It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"I rate the product's pricing a two to three out of ten."

"The pricing is bit expensive."

"It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."

"Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."

"I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."

"Each license is something like $4,000."

"The solution is expensive. It has license fees, which are renewable every year."

"The tool is priced high."

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."