We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Cloud Foundry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good speed. It's very fast."
"Easy to upgrade, easy to expand storage and change your EC2 types."
"Amazon AWS is easy to use and in the past two years, I've never had any issues with scalability or stability."
"It is flexible. It is quite comfortable to use for organizations."
"Amazon has a much better understanding of the workflow of data scientists and machine learning processes. This is seen by their SageMaker which offers different versions of the models to be used."
"The solution has very good Lambda functions within AWS."
"You can instantly scale resources up or down as needed, avoiding the need to build infrastructure from scratch."
"Very good automation and very stable."
"Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."
"IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."
"My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."
"At times we find ourselves a little trapped, with the lack of customization, for what we need."
"The technical support package for free trial users should be built on and improved."
"The price of the solution is comparatively quite high in comparison with that of Azure."
"Monitoring still needs to be improved."
"Its price should be lower. The price for in-house usage should be different from production usage."
"They should have a better big data stack."
"Amazon AWS could be improved with cheaper licensing costs."
"The price could be better."
"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."
"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 250 reviews while Cloud Foundry is ranked 21st in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Cloud Foundry is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloud Foundry writes "Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes ". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Cloud Foundry is most compared with Pivotal Cloud Foundry, VMware Tanzu Application Service, Red Hat OpenShift and Microsoft Azure. See our Amazon AWS vs. Cloud Foundry report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.