Amazon Lightsail vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Red Hat are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Red Hat’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Amazon Lightsail

Read 9 Amazon Lightsail reviews

1,239 Views
996 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 61 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

10,368 Views
8,526 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Amazon Lightsail

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift and Amazon Lightsail compete in the cloud computing and application deployment category. Red Hat OpenShift appears to have the upper hand in terms of feature richness and scalability, making it more suitable for large-scale deployments compared to the cost-effective and user-friendly Amazon Lightsail.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift offers features like fast CI/CD, strong security, and robust pod solutions, beneficial for large-scale deployments. Its integration with Docker and Kubernetes simplifies deployments. Advanced security features and ImageStream are also advantages. Amazon Lightsail is focused on simplicity and cost-effectiveness, with pre-configured instances and ease of use appealing to less tech-savvy users. It supports applications like WordPress with minimal setup.

Room for Improvement: Red Hat OpenShift could improve its documentation and accessibility of the security model, and enhance autoscaling capabilities. More intuitive templates and better support for multi-cloud integrations are needed. Amazon Lightsail could enhance disk management, auto-scaling, and network features. Improvements in documentation and support will improve user onboarding and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift provides flexibility with on-premises, private, public, and hybrid cloud deployments, though it requires skilled personnel. Its technical support is varied, with some users finding it lacking. Amazon Lightsail is simpler and easier to deploy in public cloud settings, though it might not offer comprehensive technical support for complex projects.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift has a higher price point justified by extensive features. It offers bundled pricing and support though some find it expensive compared to open-source Kubernetes solutions with ROI linked to operational efficiencies. Amazon Lightsail is praised for cost-effectiveness and predictable pricing, attracting startups and small businesses, with favorable ROI for straightforward applications but limited feature set compared to OpenShift for demanding environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Lightsail

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (9th), Container Management (12th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (7th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Amazon Lightsail is 1.8%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 12.1%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Vitor Gabriel Reis Lux Barboza

IT Specialist Architecture at Nidec Global Appliance

Provides preconfigured templates for common setups and allows for easy configuration of firewall settings directly from the console

There were templates for Ubuntu, for instance, that I used. I used it if I remember, going to 20.04, I guess. It was ready, and I just used the template and it worked well. There is a template for Windows Server, but I didn't test them. Also, the configurations over the firewall in the console work very good for the purpose that we need to isolate it from the internet but allow the connection from specific IP addresses in specific ports. So the filtering in the Lightsail Firewall works good. And I am able to isolate the virtual machine well from the internet in order to avoid DDoS attacks and stuff like that.

Read full review

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Seamlessly monitor microservices with streamlined DevOps capabilities

Most benefit from it, however, I work with Kubernetes, and installing Vanilla Kubernetes is easy. That said, it introduces many tools that need to be set up individually. OpenShift comes ready out of the box, with all tools installed and configured. Red Hat certifies and confirms that all the components are compatible with each other. OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes. The integrated DevOps capabilities, such as pipelines and the container registry, are extremely beneficial. Additionally, its capability to monitor microservices and containers with integrated tools like Prometheus is a major advantage. The horizontal pod scaling exceeds the scalability features I found in Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In Lightsail, they simplified to do it in as few clicks as possible. So, around ten clicks, I have a virtual machine deployed."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"The instances optimized for WordPress are very lightweight and straightforward in configuration."

"The most valuable features are the usability and customer service."

"Implementations are completed with a few clicks, allowing efficient transitions to other development stages, and setup is easy whether for online support or basic business requirements."

"EC2 instances are pre-configured and upgraded, so you can simply select and instantly pay for an EC2 instance to set up WordPress, Node.js, or a server container using Docker."

"One of the product's most valuable features is its fixed pricing, which makes it ideal for small projects and websites that do not require scaling."

"We use Amazon Lightsail for hosting security components in-house and AI modules."

More Amazon Lightsail pros

"OpenShift offers robust tools for monitoring application traffic, allowing us to analyze client requests and other business-related metrics."

"OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes."

"Its interface is good. The other part is the seamless integration with the stack that I have. Because my stack is mostly of Red Hat, which is running on top of VMware virtualization, I have had no issues with integrating both of these and trying to install them. We had a seamless integration with the other non-Red Hat products as well."

"The developers seem to like the source-to-image feature. That makes it easy for them to deploy an application from code into containers, so they don't have to think about things. They take it straight from their code into a containerized application. If you don't have OpenShift, you have to build the container and then deploy the container to, say, EKS or something like that."

"Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."

"There is a quick deployment of the application, and we can scale out efficiently."

"Self-provisioning support saves a lot of time and unnecessary work from the system administrator who can use this time to run and monitor the infrastructure. For the developer, this means less time waiting for the provisioning and excellent flexibility for development, testing, and production. Also, in such systems it is easy for developers to monitor applications even after deployment."

"The most valuable feature is the auto scalers for all microservices. The feature allows us to place request limits and it is much cheaper than AWS."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"The main area for improvement in Lightsail is the difficulty in scaling down resources."

"Currently, there is limited support available while installing or configuring it, and resources are primarily available through community-contributed articles."

"The product's network features need enhancement."

"I don't see this solution as enterprise-ready, for bigger companies like banks."

"When you need to add some custom rules to Amazon Lightsail, the auto scaling feature is a bit difficult."

"It would be beneficial if Lightsail allowed easier upgrade and change processes, similar to EC2 instances, without needing to fully back up and reinstall configurations."

"To improve, I feel the disk management is too basic. I can't easily partition the disk for the operating system. I have to follow the main configuration that is already set up in the template. To partition the disk, I would need to deploy the operating system first and then make changes, but it's not an ideal method. I would recommend improving the disk management."

"The solution could be smoother than it is."

More Amazon Lightsail cons

"I had to frequently upgrade my cluster due to OpenShift's rolling updates every six months, which I found to be excessive."

"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."

"This solution could be improved by offering best practices on standardization and additional guidance on how to use this solution."

"One area for improvement is the documentation. They need to make it a little bit more user-friendly. Also, if you compare certain features and the installation process with Rancher, Rancher is simpler."

"If we can have a GUI-based configuration with better flexibility then it will be great."

"Credential not hidden, so people on the same group can view it."

"This is a fairly expensive solution."

"The software-defined networking part of it caused us quite a bit of heartburn. We ran into a lot of problems with the difference between on-prem and cloud, where we had to make quite a number of modifications... They've since resolved it, so it's not really an issue anymore."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The services that it provides are good for the price."

"Lightsail is available at an affordable cost starting from five dollars per month."

"Amazon Lightsail is a bit cheaper than Amazon EC2."

"The affordability of starting at five dollars makes it an attractive option for startups and medium-sized companies, aligning with budget considerations while offering essential cloud services."

"It's very cheap."

"A few months ago, Lightsail's pricing increased, likely due to the addition of the new VPC feature."

"The prices are better than EC2 machines, for instance, because they are simplified management, but it works well, and I am able to run everything that I need on it."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period."

"I don't deal with the cost part, but I know that the cost is very high when compared to other products. They charge for CPU and memory, but we don't worry about it."

"The licensing cost for OpenShift is expensive when compared to other products. RedHat also charges you additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"We are currently using the open version, OKD. We plan to get the enterprise version in the future."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Lightsail?

In Lightsail, they simplified to do it in as few clicks as possible. So, around ten clicks, I have a virtual machine deployed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Lightsail?

Lightsail is available at an affordable cost starting from five dollars per month. This cost may increase with additional features like a static IP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Lightsail?

The main area for improvement in Lightsail is the difficulty in scaling down resources. While it is easy to scale up, scaling down is not straightforward and involves additional complexities.

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 37% of the time

Google Cloud vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 37% of the time

Heroku vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Public Cloud vs Amazon Lightsail

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon Lightsail Competitors

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 18% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

April 2025

Download Amazon Lightsail product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

March 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Lightsail is ideal for simpler workloads, quick deployments, and getting started on AWS. It’s designed to help you start small, and then scale as you grow.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Lightsail vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.