Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Red Hat OpenShift Logo

Red Hat OpenShift pros and cons

Vendor: Red Hat
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,431 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat OpenShift enhances security by running applications with limited privileges, ensuring a secure environment for resources and projects.
It provides excellent integration with Jenkins for continuous integration and supports a wide range of programming languages and environments.
The platform offers automatic scaling, self-healing features, and valuable tools for efficiently managing microservices.
OpenShift is renowned for its robust security model and value-add features not found in Upstream Kubernetes.
The platform facilitates DevOps practices, improves CI/CD workflows, and provides robust tools for monitoring application traffic.

CONS

Red Hat OpenShift needs improvement in support for legacy applications and Bitbucket repositories.
There are issues with monitoring, latency, and performance that need attention.
The platform requires enhancements in documentation and technical support to better address user needs.
OpenShift has challenges with integration, especially with cloud platforms and third-party services.
Cluster upgrades in OpenShift can result in downtime, indicating a need for better management solutions.
 

Red Hat OpenShift Pros review quotes

JK
Dec 12, 2022
OpenShift offers more stability than Kubernetes.
reviewer1563195 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2021
The solution provides a lot of flexibility to the application team for running their applications in the container platform, without needing to monitor the entire infrastructure all the time. It automatically scales and automatically self-heals. There is also a mechanism to alert the team in case it is over-committing or overutilizing the application.
Markos Sellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2023
Its security is most valuable. It's by default secure, which is very important.
Learn what your peers think about Red Hat OpenShift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MB
Dec 7, 2022
OpenShift is based on Kubernetes and we try to use all the Kubernetes objects of OpenShift. We don't use features that are specific to OpenShift, except internal certificates for the services. The one feature that is missing from Kubernetes and that is really useful in OpenShift is the lifecycle of the cluster and the ease of installation. We use VMware and VMware integration internally with the OpenShift installer, which is very good. With OpenShift it's easy to spin up or scale out a cluster.
JS
Mar 15, 2022
The developers seem to like the source-to-image feature. That makes it easy for them to deploy an application from code into containers, so they don't have to think about things. They take it straight from their code into a containerized application. If you don't have OpenShift, you have to build the container and then deploy the container to, say, EKS or something like that.
Balaji K R - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2023
In terms of implementation, OpenShift is very user-friendly, which is an advantage. We are using it along with GitLab for implementing CI/CD pipelines. That's a feature that other products also have, but in OpenShift, we find it good.
AS
Apr 26, 2023
The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the security context constraint (SCC). The solution’s security throughout the stack is good. And security context constraints provide port-level security. It's a granular level of control, where you can give privileges to certain users to work on certain applications.
reviewer1768764 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2022
The company had a product called device financing, where the company worked as a partner with Google. It allowed customers to take mobile phones on loan or via credit. When we migrated those services to OpenShift in February last year, we were able to sell over 100,000 devices in a single day, which was very good.
Vikram Casula - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 14, 2022
Its interface is good. The other part is the seamless integration with the stack that I have. Because my stack is mostly of Red Hat, which is running on top of VMware virtualization, I have had no issues with integrating both of these and trying to install them. We had a seamless integration with the other non-Red Hat products as well.
ES
Jan 29, 2024
OpenShift offers robust tools for monitoring application traffic, allowing us to analyze client requests and other business-related metrics.
 

Red Hat OpenShift Cons review quotes

JK
Dec 12, 2022
The operators need a lot of improvement, with better integrations.
reviewer1563195 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2021
Documentation and technical support could be improved. The product is good, but when we raise a case with support—say we are having an image issue—the support is not really up to the mark. It is difficult to get support... When we raise a case, their support people will hesitate to get on a call or a screen-sharing session. That is a major drawback when it comes to OpenShift.
Markos Sellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2023
Autoscaling is a very unique feature, but it could be useful to have more options based on traffic statistics, for example, via Prometheus. So, there should be more ready solutions to autoscale based on specific applications.
Learn what your peers think about Red Hat OpenShift. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MB
Dec 7, 2022
The solution needs to support the new features in Kubernetes more quickly.
JS
Mar 15, 2022
The software-defined networking part of it caused us quite a bit of heartburn. We ran into a lot of problems with the difference between on-prem and cloud, where we had to make quite a number of modifications... They've since resolved it, so it's not really an issue anymore.
Balaji K R - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2023
We want to see better alerting, especially in critical situations requiring immediate intervention. Until we go to the dashboard, it can be challenging to quickly recognize that there's an issue for us to deal with. Therefore, a popup of the event or a tweaked GUI to catch our attention when it's alerting would be a welcome change. Everything else is good. We don't need any additional features. From the operations perspective, as an administrator, there is nothing concerning.
AS
Apr 26, 2023
One area for improvement is the documentation. They need to make it a little bit more user-friendly. Also, if you compare certain features and the installation process with Rancher, Rancher is simpler.
reviewer1768764 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2022
The whole area around the hybrid cloud could be improved. I would like to deploy a Red Hat OpenShift cluster on-premise and on the cloud, then have Red Hat do the entire hybrid cloud management.
Vikram Casula - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 14, 2022
One of the features that I've observed in Tanzu Mission Control is that I can manage multiple Kubernetes environments. For instance, one of my lines of business is using OpenShift OKD; another one wants to use Google Anthos, and somebody else wants to use VMware Tanzu. If I have to manage all these, Tanzu Mission Control is giving me the opportunity to completely manage all of my Kubernetes clusters, whereas, with OpenShift, I can only manage a particular area. I can't manage other Kubernetes clusters. I would like to have the option to manage all Kubernetes clusters with OpenShift.
ES
Jan 29, 2024
An enhancement to consider for the future might involve incorporating a comprehensive solution for CI/CD tailored specifically for OpenShift.