Amazon SageMaker vs Google Cloud Datalab comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.3% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to Google’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon SageMaker

Read 36 Amazon SageMaker reviews

6,112 Views
4,892 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Datalab

Read 6 Google Cloud Datalab reviews

711 Views
612 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Amazon SageMaker

Google Cloud Datalab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Google Cloud Datalab and Amazon SageMaker compete in cloud-based machine learning platforms. Amazon SageMaker seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive suite of tools and extensive features despite the compelling pricing and support of Google Cloud Datalab.

Features: Google Cloud Datalab features integration with BigQuery and Cloud Storage, supporting data analysis and visualization with Python-based notebooks. It also provides scalable cloud storage options alongside seamless integration within Google's ecosystem. Amazon SageMaker offers built-in algorithms, managed infrastructure for training and deployment, and integration with various AWS services, including Lambda and S3. It supports a plethora of machine learning frameworks and provides tools like SageMaker Studio for a comprehensive development experience.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Datalab could improve in automating infrastructure management, expanding AI feature capabilities, and enhancing node configuration. Amazon SageMaker might enhance user interface intuitiveness, offer more detailed documentation for less experienced users, and provide greater flexibility in pricing models for startups and independent developers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Datalab benefits from integration with Google's cloud services, allowing straightforward data access and collaboration. Meanwhile, Amazon SageMaker supports various deployment strategies with features like automated scaling and guided assistance, delivering extensive customer resources and flexibility to deploy models efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Datalab is considered cost-effective, particularly for users within Google's ecosystem. Amazon SageMaker, potentially more expensive, offers substantial ROI due to its feature-rich environment and scalability, potentially making it a more valuable long-term investment despite higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (5th)

Google Cloud Datalab

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 7.3%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud Datalab is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Hemant Paralkar

Lead Consultant at Saama

Improves team collaboration with advanced feature sharing but needs a better user experience

Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker. This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background. Additionally, dealing with frequent UI updates can be challenging, especially for infrastructure architects like myself. It involves effort to migrate to new UIs, making the updates not seamless. User auditing requires enhancements as tracking operations performed by users can be difficult due to dynamic IP validation and role propagation.

Read full review

Nilesh Gode

Project Manager - Data Science at Mettler-Toledo International Inc.

Easy to setup, stable and easy to design data pipelines

The scalability is average. We have not faced any issues with scalability. There are more than 500 end users using this solution in our company. It is an integral part of the daily operations. The usage pattern is not a one-time thing; employees regularly access and utilize the application. We use it at a global level with a scattered user base. This means that users don't all use the application at the same time. So, around 300 out of 500 employees use the solution, and this usage is spread out throughout the day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to scale...The documentation and online community support have been sufficient for us so far."

"The technical support from AWS is excellent."

"The tool makes our ML model development a bit more efficient because everything is in one environment."

"The intuitive interface and streamlined user experience make it easy to navigate and set up various tools like Visual Studio Code or Jupyter Notebook."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is that you don't have to do any programming in order to perform some of your use cases."

"The solution's ability to improve work at my organization stems from the ensemble model and a combination of various models it provides."

"The technical support of the tool was good."

"I have seen a return on investment, probably a factor of four or five."

More Amazon SageMaker pros

"All of the features of this product are quite good."

"Google Cloud Datalab is very customizable."

"For me, it has been a stable product."

"The APIs are valuable."

"The infrastructure is highly reliable and efficient, contributing to a positive experience."

"In MLOps, when we are designing the data pipeline, the designing of the data pipeline is easy in Google Cloud."

Cons

"I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox."

"For any cloud provider, the cost has to be substantially reduced, especially in the case of Amazon SageMaker, which is extremely expensive for huge workloads."

"In my opinion, one improvement for Amazon SageMaker would be to offer serverless GPUs. Currently, we incur costs on an hourly basis. It would be beneficial if the tool could provide pay-as-you-go pricing based on endpoints."

"The platform could be more accessible to users with basic coding skills, making it more intuitive and easier for beginners to use comfortably."

"The main challenge with Amazon SageMaker is the integrations."

"The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of SageMaker and AWS, in general, need improvement as they are not intuitive and require substantial time to learn how to use specific services."

"The documentation must be made clearer and more user-friendly."

"I would say the IDE is quite immature, but it is still in its infancy, so I expect it to get better over time."

More Amazon SageMaker cons

"The product must be made more user-friendly."

"Connectivity challenges for end-users, particularly when loading data, environments, and libraries, need to be addressed for an enhanced user experience."

"There is room for improvement in the graphical user interface. So that the initial user would use it properly, that would be a good option."

"Even if your application is always connected to its database, the processing can be cumbersome. It shouldn't be so complicated."

"The interface should be more user-friendly."

"We have also encountered challenges during our transition period in terms of data control and segmentation. The management of each channel and data structure as it has its own unique characteristics requires very detailed and precise control. The allocation should be appropriate and the complexity increases due to the different time zones and geographic locations of our clients. The process usually involves migrating the existing database sets to gcp and ensure data integrity is maintained. This is the only challenge that we faced while navigating the integers of the solution and honestly it was an interesting and unique experience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, I'd also rate it ten out of ten because it's been beneficial compared to other solutions."

"The support costs are 10% of the Amazon fees and it comes by default."

"Databricks solution is less costly than Amazon SageMaker."

"SageMaker is worth the money for our use case."

"The pricing is complicated as it is based on what kind of machines you are using, the type of storage, and the kind of computation."

"Amazon SageMaker is a very expensive product."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The solution is relatively cheaper."

More Amazon SageMaker pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is quite reasonable, and I would give it a rating of four out of ten."

"It is affordable for us because we have a limited number of users."

"The product is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?

We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?

Before deploying SageMaker, I reviewed the pricing, especially for notebook instances. The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud Datalab?

Google Cloud Datalab is very customizable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Datalab?

Access is always via URL, and unless your network is fast, it would be a little tough in India. In India, if we had a faster network, it would be easier. In a big data environment, like when forcin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Datalab?

It's for our daily data processing, and there's a batch job that executes it. The process involves more than ten servers or systems. Some of them use a mobile network, some are ONTAP networks, and ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 17% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 12% of the time

Dataiku vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 9% of the time

Domino Data Science Platform vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon SageMaker Competitors

IBM SPSS Statistics vs Google Cloud Datalab

Compared 45% of the time

Databricks vs Google Cloud Datalab

Compared 31% of the time

Cloudera Data Science Workbench vs Google Cloud Datalab

Compared 24% of the time

More Google Cloud Datalab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker

March 2025

Download Amazon SageMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Datalab

March 2025

Download Google Cloud Datalab product report

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker

No data available

Overview

Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cloud Datalab is a powerful interactive tool created to explore, analyze, transform and visualize data and build machine learning models on Google Cloud Platform. It runs on Google Compute Engine and connects to multiple cloud services easily so you can focus on your data science tasks.

Google

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab

March 2025

Free Report: Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon SageMaker vs. Google Cloud Datalab report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.