Amazon SageMaker vs Starburst Enterprise comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Starburst are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Starburst is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.5% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to Starburst’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Starburst users who would recommend it.

Amazon SageMaker

Read 36 Amazon SageMaker reviews

6,544 Views
5,235 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Starburst Enterprise

Read 2 Starburst Enterprise reviews

1,208 Views
1,042 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon SageMaker

Starburst Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Amazon SageMaker and Starburst Enterprise are competing products in advanced data analytics and machine learning. Amazon SageMaker seems to have an upper hand in pricing and support, while Starburst Enterprise offers a strong feature set, making it appealing despite higher costs.

Features: Amazon SageMaker provides comprehensive machine learning tools such as model training, deployment, and management, along with scalable infrastructure. It integrates tightly with AWS services. Starburst Enterprise is strong with its SQL engine and data federation capabilities, enabling cross-platform analytics and handling queries from different data sources efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon SageMaker facilitates seamless deployment within the AWS ecosystem, simplifying setup and scaling. It offers extensive AWS support and resources. Starburst Enterprise can run on various platforms including on-premises and cloud, but may involve more complex setup. It provides tailored support and consultancy services, emphasizing direct customer interaction, which benefits complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon SageMaker offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it cost-effective for variable usage and providing significant AWS credits for startups, resulting in a favorable ROI. Starburst Enterprise requires a higher initial setup cost, however, it offers a compelling ROI by efficiently querying data across multiple sources, which reduces the need for costly data migration and duplication.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 839,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (4th)

Starburst Enterprise

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 7.5%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Starburst Enterprise is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Hemant Paralkar

Lead Consultant at Saama

Improves team collaboration with advanced feature sharing but needs a better user experience

Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker. This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background. Additionally, dealing with frequent UI updates can be challenging, especially for infrastructure architects like myself. It involves effort to migrate to new UIs, making the updates not seamless. User auditing requires enhancements as tracking operations performed by users can be difficult due to dynamic IP validation and role propagation.

Read full review

KamleshPant

Senior Software Architect at USEReady

Connects to any data source from any region and offers unified access

There are no specific projects supported by Starburst regarding AI initiatives or machine learning projects. In the future, if we have all the data available, we can definitely capitalize on AI/ML and LLM capabilities to summarize data and gain insights. That's our future goal, but we haven't reached that point yet. There should be support for REST API data sources to access data from the web. We often have data coming in and communicate with data sources via REST API calls. I don't see that capability in Starburst currently; everything is through JDBC or ODBC. If Starburst could seamlessly access data using REST API capabilities, it would be a game-changer. The self-service data management features, like self-service materialized views, are great, but they can be a bit complex for basic users to understand.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Allows you to create API endpoints."

"We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for these models, making accessing them convenient as needed."

"The Autopilot feature is really good because it's helpful for people who don't have much experience with coding or data pipelines. When we suggest SageMaker to clients, they don't have to go through all the steps manually. They can leverage Autopilot to choose variables, run experiments, and monitor costs. The results are also pretty accurate."

"SageMaker supports building, training, and deploying AI models from scratch, which is crucial for my ML project."

"Amazon SageMaker is highly valuable for managing ML workloads. It connects to AWS cloud resources, making it easy to deploy algorithms and collaborate using tools like GitLab. It offers a wide range of Python libraries and other necessary tools for modelling and algorithms."

"The feature I found most valuable is the data catalog, as it assists with the lineage of data through the preparation pipeline."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is its integration. For example, AWS Lambda. Additionally, we can write Python code."

"The tool makes our ML model development a bit more efficient because everything is in one environment."

More Amazon SageMaker pros

"It's very scalable, fast performing, and supports many catalogs."

"We have noticed improvements in performance using Starburst Enterprise. It handles complex data, including reading and partitioning files. We can add a new catalog to Starburst Enterprise by providing connection details and service account information. This allows us to integrate with existing tools, such as the Snowflake database, which we use for data protection in our project."

Cons

"The product must provide better documentation."

"Amazon might need to emphasize its capabilities in generative models more effectively."

"I would say the IDE is quite immature, but it is still in its infancy, so I expect it to get better over time."

"I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox."

"Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker."

"I had to create custom templates for labeling multi-data sets, such as text and images, which was time-consuming."

"While integration is available, there are concerns about how secure this integration is, particularly when exposing data to SageMaker."

"Amazon SageMaker can make it simpler to manage the data flow from start to finish, such as by integrating data, usingthe machine, and deploying models. This process could be more user-friendly compared to other tools. I would also like to improve integration with Bedrock and the LLM connection for AWS."

More Amazon SageMaker cons

"Starburst Enterprise could improve by offering additional features similar to those provided by other SQL query tools. For example, incorporating functionalities like pivot tables would make it more feasible to use."

"There should be support for REST API data sources to access data from the web."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"The pricing is comparable."

"The cost offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model. It depends on the instance that you do."

"Databricks solution is less costly than Amazon SageMaker."

"The support costs are 10% of the Amazon fees and it comes by default."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The pricing could be better, especially for querying. The per-query model feels expensive."

"The solution is relatively cheaper."

More Amazon SageMaker pricing and cost advice

"I haven't personally dealt with the pricing aspects first-hand, but from what I understand, it largely depends on the specifics of your setup, especially the machines you use on AWS. The cost of using Starburst Enterprise can vary based on the amount of data you're processing and the type of machines you opt for, whether on AWS or another cloud platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

45%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?

We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?

Before deploying SageMaker, I reviewed the pricing, especially for notebook instances. The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Starburst Enterprise?

I haven't personally dealt with the pricing aspects first-hand, but from what I understand, it largely depends on the specifics of your setup, especially the machines you use on AWS. The cost of us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Starburst Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Starburst Enterprise?

We use Starburst with one client who is exploring their ecosystem to remove data silos and enable data access across departments. It's a very big ecosystem, like a finance institute. They are curre...

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 21% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 12% of the time

Dataiku vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 9% of the time

Google Vertex AI vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 9% of the time

Domino Data Science Platform vs Amazon SageMaker

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon SageMaker Competitors

Databricks vs Starburst Enterprise

Compared 38% of the time

Starburst Galaxy vs Starburst Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Dremio vs Starburst Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

Alteryx vs Starburst Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Spark Streaming vs Starburst Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Starburst Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker

March 2025

Download Amazon SageMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Science Platforms

February 2025

Download Starburst Enterprise product report

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker

No data available

Overview

Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Starburst Enterprise is a data analytics platform that enables organizations to access and analyze data from multiple sources, including cloud-based and on-premises data warehouses. It provides a single access point to all data sources, allowing users to query and analyze data without moving it between systems.

By providing a unified view, Starburst Enterprise helps organizations make better-informed decisions and improve operational efficiency, leading to better customer insights and more accurate forecasting. Overall, Starburst Enterprise is a powerful tool for organizations looking to unlock the full potential of their data.

Starburst

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

839,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon SageMaker vs. Starburst Enterprise report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.